• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Obama amnesty undercut by sky-high applications approval rate for Dreamers

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
03-28-2016, 04:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,817 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Quote:
President Obama’s deportation amnesty for illegal immigrant Dreamers approved 93 percent of all applications decided through December — a strikingly high number that will likely play a role next month when the Supreme Court hears a legal challenge to a broader amnesty.
Give me a break, we're just 700k.

Quote:
“It tells me that they’re rubber-stamping DACA applications. Any program that four years after its initiation is still approving 93 percent of applicants is a program that doesn’t have very high standards,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for an immigration crackdown.
Like if they're not checking backgrounds, what a joke.

Quote:
In one case, an immigrant identified by his first name, Christian, 24, had already been ordered deported along with his father, who was accused of being part of crimes in Guatemala’s decades-old civil war. The advocates say Christian applied for the amnesty and met all the criteria and was even a hardship case because he was the sole provider for his daughter and her mother, yet he was denied without further explanation.

In another case, a Virginia man named Francisco, who arrived from Mexico when he was 10, was denied DACA benefits. The immigrant rights advocates said he is married to a U.S. citizen, has a 6-year-old child who is a citizen and had a minor criminal record that shouldn’t have disqualified him — yet he, too, was denied.

Lawyers also raised the case of Gabriela, a 31-year-old who had been approved for the amnesty in June 2014 but had it revoked a year and a half later.

“The argument that the government lacks discretion to deny deferred action, or to revoke it at any time once granted, is simply wrong,” the attorneys for the immigrant rights groups said in their brief to the high court.
So getting or renewing DACA is like flipping a coin? Again, what a joke!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...proval-rate-f/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#2
03-28-2016, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,715 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
You can bet they will go through the approvals with a fine toothed comb and find any excuse to say it's a bad system once they find a few people with arrests in their record getting approved.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#3
03-28-2016, 06:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Jeeez who knew that a program that has strick requirements and let's people know the consequences of chargers or duis would attract only this people who don't have any. Is like republican believe DACA is trap meant to capture illegal aliens and deport them
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#4
03-29-2016, 02:02 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
Is this good news for June SC decision?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#5
03-29-2016, 03:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA View Post
Is this good news for June SC decision?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#6
03-29-2016, 04:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,656 posts
dado123
0 AP
“It tells me that they’re rubber-stamping DACA applications. Any program that four years after its initiation is still approving 93 percent of applicants is a program that doesn’t have very high standards,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for an immigration crackdown.

4 years, is not daca more like 3?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...proval-rate-f/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#7
03-29-2016, 04:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,656 posts
dado123
0 AP
well that is how the program was structured, because only the crem de la crem was meant for this program, i.e. the young undocumented, duh, so no sh*T it has a high approval rating.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#8
03-31-2016, 02:42 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
6,010 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
well that is how the program was structured, because only the crem de la crem was meant for this program, i.e. the young undocumented, duh, so no sh*T it has a high approval rating.
Pretty much this. Especially when people know that showing themselves to immigration and applying for a benefit they won't get is the best way to get an NTA in an immigration court and get deported... Hell, we were wondering where's the catch, and the way they unveiled the program it seemed like you get one chance to get it and if you miss a bit of evidence you get denied with no appeal and no re-application. Now we know that's no longer true - you'll get an RFE or a NOID beforehand, and even if you get denied you can retry.

So what's the process, you have a list of requirements. You take a look at the list of requirements.

Yeah, I qualify, let me apply.
No, I don't qualify, I will not apply.

Then you have the gray-zone cases that meet one of the requirements just marginally. For example people that originally entered US while under 16, departed, and returned at 16 and over, or some that entered right before 16 and had to bend over backwards to prove that. Some of them got approved, some of them got denied. USCIS did approve some, denied others. Same thing with people with minor criminal records - some got approved, others got denied.

Then you have the idiots who applied even though they're not eligible. You know there are at least SOME.

93% approval rate? Sounds fair. I wonder what's the approval rate for AOS (especially considering that AOS denial = NTA unless you some non-immigrant status to fall back onto).

They bitched about rates previously too. When the first year the approval rates were around 97-99%.
Last edited by Demise; 03-31-2016 at 02:49 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#9
04-03-2016, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
504 posts
johnfreyan
0 AP
I remember people here arguing about whether to use paper clips or staples to keep the documents together, and whether the documents should be in one particular order or another. People (incluidng me) were being anally retentive as FUCK during the days of the initial applications.

OF COURSE the success rate is high. Ugh, Republicans...
__________________
(Application done by myself) Date delivered - 8/16/12 Nebraska
Date acceptance letter of application received - 8/20/12
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action (Application Approved) - 8/21/12
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/12/12
Date of EAD Notification- 9/28/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
johnfreyan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to johnfreyan
Find all posts by johnfreyan
#10
04-04-2016, 01:09 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
2 weeks away from hearing! Will it be on TV?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.