DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Brownsville court grants state's motion to stay merits proceedings until Sept. 5th

#1
08-17-2017, 01:10 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Re: DACA Lawsuit to have it dismissed

@James_Barragan

Quote:
Plaintiffs had moved to dismiss the case in late July, after Paxton letter to Trump administration threatening to sue over
Quote:
But Paxton had moved to stay merits proceedings until Sept. 5th. He then gave feds that date as deadline to rescind DACA or be sued
Quote:
By staying merits proceedings, Hanen is indicating that he'll wait to see what Trump admin does before ruling on throwing out the case
Quote:
Also allows Texas coalition to keep the pressure on Trump to make DACA decision w/o court having to make the call on dismissing case
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
Last edited by Swim19; 08-17-2017 at 01:13 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
08-17-2017, 01:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
They are even less spineless than I thought.

They rather Trump take the blame for DACA ending. No signs this will be he case.
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
08-17-2017, 01:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
218 posts
jogearce
0 AP
not familiar with the legal lingo here. can you explain what this is supposed to mean in simple English ?
__________________
AOS PACKAGE SENT: 08/14/2017 Sent from Chicago - NOA RECEIVED: 08/18/2017 - BIOMETRICS NOTICE RECEIVED: 8/25/2017 - BIOMETRICS COMPLETED: 9/5/2017 - EAD APPROVED: 10/26/2017 - NOA FOR INTERVIEW RECEIVED: 6/19/2018 (FOR 07/18/2018 ) - AOS APPROVED: 7/20/217 - GC received: 7/28/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
08-17-2017, 01:44 PM
Senior Member
From FL
Joined in Jun 2011
3,590 posts
Dres2011's Avatar
Dres2011
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jogearce View Post
not familiar with the legal lingo here. can you explain what this is supposed to mean in simple English ?
Theyre waiting for trump to end it himself.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
08-17-2017, 01:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
This could be potentially good news. Why are they trying so hard to force his hand?

If Trump doesn't act, will the lawsuit be thrown out?
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
08-17-2017, 01:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
The Plaintiff States move to continue the stay of proceedings on the merits of the claims until September 5, 2017 to allow the parties additional time to attempt to resolve this matter without further litigation. The Defendants are unopposed to this requested relief; the Intervenors are opposed. The basis for this Motion is as follows
https://www.scribd.com/document/3531...il-Sept-5-2017

I think it is saying that the plantiff (Texas AG) wants the judge to hold off on any ruling until Sept 5th, saying the defendant (Trump) is not opposed to it, the intervenors (I think Maldef or whom ever filed for case to be dismissed is opposed). And it looks like the judge will not rule on anything until Sept 5th.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
08-17-2017, 01:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
The Plaintiff States move to continue the stay of proceedings on the merits of the claims until September 5, 2017 to allow the parties additional time to attempt to resolve this matter without further litigation. The Defendants are unopposed to this requested relief; the Intervenors are opposed. The basis for this Motion is as follows
https://www.scribd.com/document/3531...il-Sept-5-2017

I think it is saying that the plantiff (Texas AG) wants the judge to hold off on any ruling until Sept 5th, saying the defendant (Trump) is not opposed to it, the intervenors (I think Maldef or whom ever filed for case to be dismissed is opposed). And it looks like the judge will not rule on anything until Sept 5th.
Probably because their case has no merit.
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
08-17-2017, 02:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2010
1,104 posts
Marco956's Avatar
Marco956
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva02 View Post
Probably because their case has no merit.
Their case has the same merits as the DAPA and e-DACA case had. It's not looking good for us. Congress is our only hope
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
08-17-2017, 02:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco956 View Post
Their case has the same merits as the DAPA and e-DACA case had. It's not looking good for us. Congress is our only hope
well DAPA and E-DACA were not implemented yet, and I remember this same judge said something like" once the genie is out the bottle it is difficult to unwind", so will see.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
08-17-2017, 02:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco956 View Post
Their case has the same merits as the DAPA and e-DACA case had. It's not looking good for us. Congress is our only hope
No they argued it was not published for public comment for 60 days, DACA was.
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.