• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

LEAKED MEMO: DREAMers Are ‘Critical’ To Dems ‘Future Electoral Success’

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
01-09-2018, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,180 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/08/le...toral-success/


The Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund circulated a memo on Monday calling illegal immigrants brought here at a young age — so-called “Dreamers” — a “critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success.”

The memo, co-authored by former Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri, was sent around to allies calling on Democrats to “refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for Dreamers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.”

President Donald Trump’s administration moved to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy in September, which former President Barack Obama instituted through executive order to keep immigrants who came here as children from being deported.

Trump called on Congress to find a legislative fix for young immigrants, or “Dreamers,” facing deportation. House lawmakers recently put forward a bipartisan DACA compromise bill that also claims to address worries over chain migration. However, it’s unclear if the bill will pass.

CAP Action’s memo says protecting DACA is not only a “moral imperative” for Democrats, it also key to getting votes.

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” reads Palmieri’s memo, obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond,” reads the memo. “In short, the next few weeks will tell us a lot about the Democratic Party and its long-term electoral prospects.”

Fox News Host Tucker Carlson confronted Center for American Progress senior fellow Henry Fernandez on the memo. CAP Action is the 501(c)(4) political group, a sister group of the think tank where Fernandez is technically employed.



This is huge. The Center for American Progress has a lot of sway on the Democratic party.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#2
01-09-2018, 01:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,180 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
https://www.scribd.com/document/3687...mo-On-Dreamers

This is the full memo.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#3
01-09-2018, 01:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
629 posts
desice's Avatar
desice
0 AP
fucking retarded to come right out publicly with this shit...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
desice
View Public Profile
Send a private message to desice
Find all posts by desice
#4
01-09-2018, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
3,098 posts
fl_dreamer
0 AP
Thanks for the find. As I have been saying, we aint going back in the shadows. Permanent would be great but I will take something temporary as well. Beggars cannot be choosers.
__________________
Expires: 10/2021. Renewal for extension post 2021 sent.
Update your signature: Click on username, control panel, user settings,edit signature
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
fl_dreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to fl_dreamer
Find all posts by fl_dreamer
#5
01-09-2018, 02:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
937 posts
tf2legend
0 AP
Yes we are critical. We will surely be voting for Democrats 15-20 years from now. Gtfo

I'm independent af right now. I'm not gonna blindly follow a political party like this is some sports game. If I do vote, it will be on the candidate
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tf2legend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tf2legend
Find all posts by tf2legend
#6
01-09-2018, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,180 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
I don't think a temporary bill will happen. They seem to want a fix and a temporary one doesn't fix the problem.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#7
01-09-2018, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
937 posts
tf2legend
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUSenior View Post
I don't think a temporary bill will happen. They seem to want a fix and a temporary one doesn't fix the problem.
Well if they fail to pass something by the 19th a Bridge Act seems likely
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tf2legend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tf2legend
Find all posts by tf2legend
#8
01-09-2018, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2006
644 posts
glacier1985
0 AP
It's common sense. Nothing really suppress the century.
__________________
did you call today?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
glacier1985
View Public Profile
Send a private message to glacier1985
Find all posts by glacier1985
#9
01-09-2018, 02:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,180 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by tf2legend View Post
Well if they fail to pass something by the 19th a Bridge Act seems likely
Source? And how did this thread get derailed once again for a discussion about the Bridge Act? For months, I haven't heard a single Democrat mention the Bridge Act. The other article quoted in another thread says that even Trump wants something permanent, not another stopgap. The only people who have mentioned it is Grassley and the Senate Republican leadership because they likes his own bill, a bill no Democrat or moderate Republican would support.

If it happens or if there is talk about the Bridge Act, I will recant with no reluctance. But I don't see any indication that a clean Bridge Act is happening.
Last edited by CUSenior; 01-09-2018 at 02:34 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#10
01-09-2018, 02:22 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2008
379 posts
IbelieveIcanFly's Avatar
IbelieveIcanFly
0 AP
Yes but not in a sense that we will vote 15 or 20 odd years from now (many of us might not even become USC) instead we will boost Hispanic support of the party
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IbelieveIcanFly
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IbelieveIcanFly
Find all posts by IbelieveIcanFly
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.