Here’s what’s blocking senators from reaching a DACA deal.

Nearly two-dozen senators from both parties want to offer legislation next week that would protect almost 700,000 undocumented immigrants from deportation, but they're stuck on whether their measure should protect the parents of these immigrants from deportation too.

Most Democrats want to preserve the so-called “chain migration” system that lets newly documented immigrants line family members up to attain legal status. Many conservative lawmakers counter this system has to end or at least be substantially scaled back.

President Donald Trump has said DACA, an Obama-era executive action, will end March 5, so Congress is about to get serious codifying the program into law. But getting consensus is difficult, maybe even impossible.

Some Republicans say colleagues should be prepared to accept a short-term extension of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program if members can’t come up with a deal. Democrats want only a permanent fix.

Fierce disagreements remain over how much to spend on Trump’s border wall, and whether to eliminate the diversity lottery program that incentivizes visas for individuals from countries with lower immigration rates.
The coalition’s original membership was made up almost entirely of self-described moderates, especially heavy with Democrats from red states who are vulnerable in the 2018 midterms — Missouri’s Claire McCaskill and Florida’s Bill Nelson, for instance. But the group has since opened its doors to anyone who wants to get involved, which perhaps has made reaching consensus thornier.

In addition to Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., veterans of crafting immigration policy who are pushing for a more expansive pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who have called for a more restrictive DACA fix, are also now involved.

Rubio in particular is advising members to avoid the issue of “chain migration,” also called “family-based migration,” when it comes to the parents of DACA recipients.

“We are likelier to pass a bill that is silent on the parents,” Rubio said Thursday. “That doesn’t mean it’s not a sympathetic population, but I would say there are similarly sympathetic populations that are not being addressed no matter what we do.”

Short of a compromise, the fallback position would be to delay DACA’s imminent end. On Thursday, Flake was also preparing for such a scenario, announcing he was working on legislation that would extend DACA for three years plus bolster border security.


Both Graham and Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., at one point supported a three-year DACA extension. But that was in January 2017, before lawmakers caught a glimpse of the possibility a comprehensive immigration bill could actually become law.

Asked whether Democrats would support such a measure now, Durbin shook his head.

“You’re going to hear as many variations as the fertile minds of my colleagues can produce,” said Durbin, “but I will just tell you my goal is still a pathway to citizenship for the Dreamers, and will keep working towards that goal.”



Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...#storylink=cpy

most likely an extension. please be an extension w/ intl travel at least. -_-

No because then you have the inspected entry loophole and Republicans arent on board w that

If they want to continue keeping their seats and donations they better pass a bill that benefits dreamers and their families. I'm not playing I think our communities can push for a campaign that removes people that don't stand with us and only want to continue to criminalize us

They can address everyone else in CIR. Pass the DREAM Act or some kind of compromise and give Mango Mussolini his wall.

Trump should compromise to DA in exchange for visa lottery, tough border security, interior enforcement, e verify and an end to indirect chain migration while honoring already approved petitions regardless of relationship to sponsoring party.

Our great leader has a golden opportunity to make history in his ample manly hands. #MAGA

That would be the best outcome at this point in my opinion.

Isn't that what the Dems offered at one point last month? He didn't accept.

Let keep the pressure even though Democrats have lost leverage but we got campaign skills we can knock them down and replace them one mutha facka at a time

That sounds like the best solution at this point.

It's quietly underway.