• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

February

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Dems say 20 'poison pills' stand in way of spending deal

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#1
03-20-2018, 02:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
2,683 posts
jaylove16
0 AP
House Democratic leaders said Tuesday that more than a dozen “poison pill” provisions are preventing a bipartisan deal on 2018 spending, pushing Congress ever-closer to a government shutdown on Saturday and leading some top lawmakers to float the idea that another stop-gap bill may be needed to keep Washington running.

On her subcommittee, Roybal-Allard said the sides “are still at an impasse” over Republican requests for tougher border security and interior enforcement of immigration laws.

It’s still border security — [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents,” she said. “We really have been very flexible, in a lot of the areas, and they just won’t budge.”

Rep. Nita Lowey (N.Y.), senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, declined to specify the outstanding issues, but she confirmed that the 20 figure is accurate.


Several Democratic lawmakers said they’re still pushing to salvage the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as part of the omnibus package. President Trump has sought to eliminate the program, though a federal judge has temporarily blocked that effort. The lack of certainty surrounding the program’s future has led many Democrats to insist that "Dreamer" protections be included in the spending bill.

You’ve got a court decision that protects the existing DACA kids. So protecting the existing DACA kids is no deal. We already have that, so it would have to go beyond that to be significant,” Lofgren said. “We’ve got kids who have aged in, who were too young to apply, and they can’t apply under the court order.”

Roybal-Allard also emphasized that Democrats would accept tougher immigration enforcement only if the Republicans shifted tactics and offered broad protections to Dreamers and other immigrants in the country illegally.

We would have to get something really substantial,” she said.

“At least there are still talks going on,” she added. “A couple of days when there was nothing. Now at least there’s discussions at different levels.”


http://thehill.com/homenews/house/37...-spending-deal

Not a penny towards border security if we don’t get any protections in place.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jaylove16
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jaylove16
Find all posts by jaylove16
#2
03-20-2018, 03:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2018
364 posts
Dreamer1980
0 AP
Dream Act or you can go play with your legos and eat cheese burgers trump.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaylove16 View Post
House Democratic leaders said Tuesday that more than a dozen “poison pill” provisions are preventing a bipartisan deal on 2018 spending, pushing Congress ever-closer to a government shutdown on Saturday and leading some top lawmakers to float the idea that another stop-gap bill may be needed to keep Washington running.

On her subcommittee, Roybal-Allard said the sides “are still at an impasse” over Republican requests for tougher border security and interior enforcement of immigration laws.

It’s still border security — [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents,” she said. “We really have been very flexible, in a lot of the areas, and they just won’t budge.”

Rep. Nita Lowey (N.Y.), senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, declined to specify the outstanding issues, but she confirmed that the 20 figure is accurate.


Several Democratic lawmakers said they’re still pushing to salvage the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as part of the omnibus package. President Trump has sought to eliminate the program, though a federal judge has temporarily blocked that effort. The lack of certainty surrounding the program’s future has led many Democrats to insist that "Dreamer" protections be included in the spending bill.

You’ve got a court decision that protects the existing DACA kids. So protecting the existing DACA kids is no deal. We already have that, so it would have to go beyond that to be significant,” Lofgren said. “We’ve got kids who have aged in, who were too young to apply, and they can’t apply under the court order.”

Roybal-Allard also emphasized that Democrats would accept tougher immigration enforcement only if the Republicans shifted tactics and offered broad protections to Dreamers and other immigrants in the country illegally.

We would have to get something really substantial,” she said.

“At least there are still talks going on,” she added. “A couple of days when there was nothing. Now at least there’s discussions at different levels.”


http://thehill.com/homenews/house/37...-spending-deal

Not a penny towards border security if we don’t get any protections in place.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer1980
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer1980
Find all posts by Dreamer1980
#3
03-20-2018, 04:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,154 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Dream Act with no age cap.

Protect long-time undocumented immigrants who are under Orders of Supervision and have clean records.

DO NOT ALLOW INCREASED DETENTION.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#4
03-20-2018, 04:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
3,742 posts
MIdreamer's Avatar
MIdreamer
0 AP
Quote:
You’ve got a court decision that protects the existing DACA kids. So protecting the existing DACA kids is no deal. We already have that, so it would have to go beyond that to be significant,” Lofgren said. “We’ve got kids who have aged in, who were too young to apply, and they can’t apply under the court order.”
Good, wall money for DACA extension equal no deal.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MIdreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MIdreamer
Find all posts by MIdreamer
#5
03-20-2018, 04:49 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
We want to protect aged out Dreamers.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#6
03-20-2018, 06:22 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,544 posts
versailles's Avatar
versailles
0 AP
everything is a poison pill if it can't pass the house.
__________________
The king has returned.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
versailles
View Public Profile
Send a private message to versailles
Find all posts by versailles
#7
03-20-2018, 06:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2017
1,158 posts
BeansDreamtoo21
0 AP
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=205s&v=Z1Z4q99kOc4

"Democrats sell out dreamers again" TYT
Last edited by BeansDreamtoo21; 03-20-2018 at 06:52 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
BeansDreamtoo21
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BeansDreamtoo21
Find all posts by BeansDreamtoo21
#8
03-20-2018, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeansDreamtoo21 View Post
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=205s&v=Z1Z4q99kOc4
The Young Turks have been calling out the corporate Democrats for being conniving and weak on immigration for years.

But, I guess the The Young Turks are right wingers, according to the logic of some idiots here.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#9
03-20-2018, 06:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,154 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
@beehive and @versailles

Well, giving relief to other Dreamers who don't have Daca is not what is causing your Daca to term.

Surely, you both know that.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#10
03-20-2018, 06:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Trump originally said 1.8 million I think he also included age out
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.