• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Joe Manchin opens the door to filibuster reform

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#1
03-07-2021, 06:18 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,457 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
If this change was made, it could help immigration reform be passed:


Quote:
On Sunday, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a longtime defender of the filibuster, signaled that he might nevertheless be open to filibuster reforms that could make it easier for Democrats to advance their legislative agenda.
Quote:
That may not sound like a big deal, but it is: As Politico reporter Andrew Desiderio pointed out on Twitter Sunday, what Manchin appears to be describing is a throwback to the “talking filibuster,” which would likely pose a much more surmountable obstacle to the narrow Democratic Senate majority.
Quote:
As Desiderio explained, under a “talking filibuster,” any “member of the minority party can filibuster as long as he/she stays put on the floor.” But once a member finishes speaking, the filibuster would end, and “there’d be a vote at a simple majority threshold” of 50 votes, instead of the existing 60-vote threshold required to end a filibuster.

That’s a big change, because there’s currently no actual filibustering required to filibuster in the Senate, at least not in the conventional sense. As Vox explained back in 2015, the modern filibuster doesn’t require a senator talking on the floor for hours on end to delay a bill.

Instead, today’s filibuster is a straightforward move to reject unanimous consent on a bill that the minority can wield painlessly: According to former Vox writer Ezra Klein, “Today’s filibusters simply paralyze the Senate until the majority either finds 60 votes to proceed or gives up and moves on to another piece of business.”

If that rule were changed, though — say, by going back to the talking filibuster of yore — filibusters might only paralyze the Senate until the minority runs out of members willing to hold the floor.
https://www.vox.com/2021/3/7/2231814...ibuster-reform
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#2
03-07-2021, 06:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,804 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Wow that's huge! Thanks for the update babe.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#3
03-07-2021, 08:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Babe?....


Why are you such a creep...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#4
03-07-2021, 09:17 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Ngl, the silent filibuster was the worst invention of the recent senate. If you want to delay a vote by dragging the debate onward then debate (or make a fool out of yourself by reading Green Ham and Eggs out loud to the floor). This "I object, go look for 60 votes" move is absolute horseshit.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#5
03-07-2021, 09:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,238 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
I think Manchin is just being a tease. This would essentially get rid of the filibuster
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
#6
03-07-2021, 09:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2013
848 posts
FLDreamerrr
0 AP
Hopefully true but manchin has gone on record before stating he wants most bills to be bipartisan
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
FLDreamerrr
View Public Profile
Send a private message to FLDreamerrr
Find all posts by FLDreamerrr
#7
03-08-2021, 12:53 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
The democrats are toast if they don’t abolish the filibuster. Republicans are moving to make voting more difficult, gerrymander districts, and pass state laws to claw back power. Democrats will never be in the position of power and it will be harder for them to win at the presidential level if they don’t do something about the electoral collage too
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#8
03-08-2021, 01:13 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,238 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
Quote:
The democrats are toast if they don’t abolish the filibuster. Republicans are moving to make voting more difficult, gerrymander districts, and pass state laws to claw back power. Democrats will never be in the position of power and it will be harder for them to win at the presidential level if they don’t do something about the electoral collage too
No you are being overly dramatic.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
#9
03-08-2021, 03:17 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,687 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demise View Post
Ngl, the silent filibuster was the worst invention of the recent senate. If you want to delay a vote by dragging the debate onward then debate (or make a fool out of yourself by reading Green Ham and Eggs out loud to the floor). This "I object, go look for 60 votes" move is absolute horseshit.
exactly, fuck the filibuster. If they want to filibuster they need to put in the damn work like they did in the old days.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
#10
03-08-2021, 03:18 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,687 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva02 View Post
The democrats are toast if they don’t abolish the filibuster. Republicans are moving to make voting more difficult, gerrymander districts, and pass state laws to claw back power. Democrats will never be in the position of power and it will be harder for them to win at the presidential level if they don’t do something about the electoral collage too
They need to plow through Republican next two years. Pass everything they can and change the political landscape.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.