• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

US Raises Justices’ Abortion Pill Ruling to Fight DACA Lawsuit

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
06-18-2024, 07:52 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,465 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Update on lawsuit:

The Biden administration is urging the Fifth Circuit to find that Texas doesn’t have standing to challenge federal regulations protecting hundreds of thousands of immigrant dreamers from deportation, pointing to the US Supreme Court’s recent ruling on an abortion medication.

In a Monday letter to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, a Justice Department lawyer raised the justices’ 9-0 decision on June 13, which found that anti-abortion doctors that sued over Food and Drug Administration decisions on access to the abortion pill mifepristone lacked legal “standing” to bring the case. The letter said that decision “underscores that plaintiffs here lack standing” to block shields for recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program.

The Justice Department said that, like the plaintiffs in the mifepristone case, “Texas asserts standing based on indirect injury from a federal policy they allege is unlawfully lax.”

“But just as '[t]eachers in border states’ may not ‘sue to challenge allegedly lax immigration policies that lead to overcrowded classrooms,’ neither may Texas sue the government whenever a federal policy increases, even indirectly, the number of immigrants in the State,” the letter said, quoting heavily from last week’s Supreme Court opinion. “Texas’s logic ‘would seemingly not end until’ all States ‘had standing to challenge virtually every government action that they do not like'—an approach ‘flatly inconsistent with Article III.’”

The high court last week reversed a Fifth Circuit decision that would’ve placed some restrictions on the medication, finding that the challenging parties didn’t prove they were actually harmed by the regulations. “The law has never permitted doctors to challenge the government’s loosening of general public safety requirements simply because more individuals might then show up at emergency rooms or in doctors’ offices with follow-on injuries,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote.

The Fifth Circuit is currently reviewing a September ruling by US District Judge Andrew Hanen of the US District Court of the Southern District of Texas, which found President Joe Biden’s rule shielding Dreamers from deportation is unlawful.

Hanen said the new effort “suffers from the same legal impediments” as the Obama-era memorandum that first launched the DACA program. The Fifth Circuit has already ruled that the earlier action is unlawful.

The case is: State of Texas v. USA, 5th Cir., No. 23-40653, Letter

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law...t-daca-lawsuit
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
Last edited by Swim19; 06-18-2024 at 10:00 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.