![]() |
Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
Quote:
It seems there is much more support for an immigration reform. So far, I like what Senator Schumer has been crafting along with Senator Graham. Having a biometric ID card is a great way to prevent further illegal immigration and hopefully it can be used to gain support from Republicans and moderate Democrats. Hopefully this all plays out well. http://www.examiner.com/x-17495-San-...gration-Reform |
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
I never thought I'd see the day when Dobbs agreed for the need of CIR!
|
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
Quote:
|
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
I am pretty sure the ACLU and other privacy groups will take this(national I.D) issue to court if it passes as part of CIR.
|
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
The only thing that the national ID will do is centralize the government. You ask a random person that's against it, why they are against it and they will just say things like its an invasion of privacy etc. without being able to really tell why.
|
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
Lou Dobbs has always been for reform. He might even support DREAM if you stay away from instate tuition. One had to pay close attention to what he was saying to see that he would support something that helps immigrants. But boy, our advocates will never be with him. To do so means that there might be a fence and more enforcement provisions. That is why we failed in 2007 and will likely do so this year.
As for the id. Big deal. Canada and France has them and they are doing fine. Is just a social security with a photo. |
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
Quote:
|
Re: Dobbs and O’Reilly stump for ID card and push for Immigration Reform
Quote:
The reason why certain people are against is because it would centralize the government and the principle of American politics is for the states to remain states, and for state residents to remain state residents under certain laws. The reason why the other people are against is because they just don't want to go through the hassle of getting another document and since laziness is a pretty pathetic reason, they come up with something as idiotic as the ID being an invasion of privacy. Why would the issuing of passports be an invasion of your privacy by your country? The only reason your country issues them is because of another country's requirement, and there is no requirement on getting a passport. Hey, if you don't want to go somewhere you don't have to. An ID in your native country is a totally different thing: it's a necessity as we all have come to realize it in the US. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.