• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Why didn't Obama pass CIR when he had a chance?

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
09-16-2014, 10:53 PM
Senior Member
From Virginia
Joined in Aug 2012
2,329 posts
Malign0n's Avatar
Malign0n
0 AP
Quote:
In light of President Obama’s decision to delay his much-anticipated edict on immigration until after November’s elections, some critics are asking why the president and Democrats in Congress didn’t pass immigration reform back when they had overwhelming majorities in both House and Senate. It’s a good question — and a good reason to revisit 2009 and 2010, when immigration reform could have become a reality.

As a presidential candidate, Obama promised to “put comprehensive immigration reform back on the nation’s agenda during my first year in office.” After victory in 2008, he had the clout to do so: sky-high approval ratings, 257 Democrats in the House and, for a while, a filibuster-proof majority of 60 Democrats in the Senate.
And yet, immediately after being sworn in, Obama began to send subtle signals that immigration reform wasn’t a top priority. Reform was a “serious concern,” Obama told a group of regional reporters in March 2009, but not an urgent one.

“We’ve started to talk to all the parties involved and both parties here in Washington about the prospects of taking legislative steps,” Obama said. “But obviously we’ve got a lot on our plate right now.”

Immigration activists pressed hard for Obama to act; after all, he had promised. As 2009 unfolded, Obama encouraged the activists to believe he was committed to introducing a comprehensive reform bill. After a White House meeting, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, (D, Illinois) told reporters Obama had promised a bill “in the very near future.”

The next month, April 2009, the White House sent out word Obama was preparing to move. “Mr. Obama plans to speak publicly about the issue in May,” the New York Times reported, “and over the summer he will convene working groups, including lawmakers from both parties and a range of immigration groups, to begin discussing possible legislation for as early as this fall.”

Things seemed to be on track. Labor leaders — representing some of the very organizations that had killed reform under George W. Bush — announced their support.

Throughout June, Obama and top Democrats promised action. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said comprehensive immigration reform “is going to happen this session, but I want it this year, if at all possible.” Obama told a Hispanic group he was “committed” to passing reform. After meeting with congressional leaders, he declared they all “want to actively get something done and not put it off until a year, two years, three years, five years from now.”

As the summer of 2009 went on, though, the talk slowed down as work on health care reform consumed the administration. Immigration fell out of the first tier, if it had ever really been there. By August, Obama put reform at the bottom of a long list.

“I’ve got a lot on my plate,” he said, “and it’s very important for us to sequence these big initiatives in a way where they don’t all just crash at the same time. And what we’ve said is in the fall when we come back, we’re going to complete health care reform. We still have to act on energy legislation that has passed the House … We still have financial regulatory reform that has to get done … That’s a pretty big stack of bills.”

Immigration reform would have to wait for 2010. And then 2011. And then 2012. And then 2013. And now 2014.

During that time, the political dynamics of immigration reform changed repeatedly. Obama now faces entrenched Republican opposition to comprehensive reform.

And that has led to the question of why the president didn’t act when he had the chance. Wasn’t the immigration system just as “broken” then as Obama says it is now? The answer is, in Obama’s world, there was always something more important than immigration reform. And no, it wasn’t because the economic crisis was so severe that Obama could focus on nothing else; indeed, for him, the crisis year of 2009 was mostly about Obamacare.

During the days when his power was at its peak, Obama pursued higher-priority issues even as he led immigration activists to believe they were up next. Which leads to the conclusion that perhaps immigration reform — the substance of it, not the politics — has never been all that important to the president.

Now, there’s still something more important: protecting vulnerable Democrats from voter disapproval of unilateral presidential action on immigration.

Obama says he will finally act, after the election, after voters can no longer hold him or his party accountable. But who knows? Maybe something more important will come up yet again.
CREDIT:BYRON YORK/HUMAN EVENTS CONSERVATIVE NEWS

http://humanevents.com/2014/09/16/wh...ad-the-chance/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Malign0n
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Malign0n
Find all posts by Malign0n
#2
09-17-2014, 02:19 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2014
181 posts
DACAuser
0 AP
can not be trust source of information .
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACAuser
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DACAuser
Find all posts by DACAuser
#3
09-17-2014, 03:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
155 posts
jtcomander
0 AP
Yup,point taken...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jtcomander
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jtcomander
Find all posts by jtcomander
#4
09-17-2014, 07:20 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
Did you even read the article ? There's no new information there, so how can it not be trusted?
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#5
09-17-2014, 03:10 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,990 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
In retrospect, we'd probably would be better under McCain, even if we'd have to deal with that insufferable fuckwit Palin.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#6
09-17-2014, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
Well I like how things have gone other than immigration. If some form of relief passed itd be a pretty solid presidency IMO.
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#7
09-17-2014, 07:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demise View Post
In retrospect, we'd probably would be better under McCain, even if we'd have to deal with that insufferable fuckwit Palin.
Uh...no. You're thinking of Senator McCain. The old nice guy. Candidate McCain was a different person. Sore loser McCain is even worse.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#8
09-17-2014, 11:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
937 posts
tf2legend
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demise View Post
In retrospect, we'd probably would be better under McCain, even if we'd have to deal with that insufferable fuckwit Palin.
If Mccain was in office there would be no DACA
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tf2legend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tf2legend
Find all posts by tf2legend
#9
09-18-2014, 03:30 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2014
181 posts
DACAuser
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Severity View Post
Did you even read the article ? There's no new information there, so how can it not be trusted?
this is conservative site, cant be trusted.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACAuser
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DACAuser
Find all posts by DACAuser
#10
09-18-2014, 08:35 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Mccain switches sides quick
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.