• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

GOP senator: DACA court ruling 'wildly wrong'

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
Closed Thread
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
01-10-2018, 12:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
2,683 posts
jaylove16
jaylove16
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jaylove16
Find all posts by jaylove16
0 AP
Quote:
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) on Wednesday dismissed a court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from ending a key Obama-era immigration program, saying it won't impact the negotiations on Capitol Hill.

"Not at all. ...We're reading the court's opinion, but it strikes me as wildly wrong. If President Obama can create the deferred action program, then certainly President Trump can un-create it, or end it. It just makes sense,"
Cornyn told reporters when asked about the impact of the decision that, at least temporarily, keeps the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in place.

He added that "there wouldn't be any symmetry at all to the idea that one president could create it and another president couldn't end it."
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3...mpression=true
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
01-10-2018, 12:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2015
1,103 posts
Afridi786
Afridi786
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Afridi786
Find all posts by Afridi786
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaylove16 View Post
saying it won't impact the negotiations on Capitol Hill.
Most important part of the article.
__________________
4th Renewal - Sent: 9/21/19, Expiring: 8/19/20, Approved: 03/23/20
Final Renewal Attempt? - Sent: 5/20/20, Expiring: 3/22/22
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
01-10-2018, 01:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2008
606 posts
chopstix
chopstix
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chopstix
Find all posts by chopstix
0 AP
Trump can end it of course but his fingers made mistake on Twitter so everyone knows he ended it to use it as a bargaining chip.
__________________
Application sent:9/7/12-self (EAC-NYC)
I-797c notice: 9/20/12 | Biometrics: 10/18/12
Approval Notice: 12/10/12 | EAD: 12/17/12 | SSN: 1/2/12
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
01-10-2018, 01:33 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2018
42 posts
rum123456
rum123456
View Public Profile
Send a private message to rum123456
Find all posts by rum123456
0 AP
This is all political, nothing will pass next week as GOP will put poison bills out there anything that excludes GC......democrats also don't want to shutdown the government, so this allows daca to be running while case to the supreme court can take about 1/2 years, I think the outcome from this judge decision is what congress wanted.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
01-10-2018, 01:40 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Dec 2010
3,448 posts
BestBefore1984's Avatar
BestBefore1984
BestBefore1984
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BestBefore1984
Find all posts by BestBefore1984
0 AP
Are you jumping on the quitter bandwagon too?

I wonder if any of you are capable of being responsible full functioning adults. How can you expect to be a leader to your kids and spouse if ya'll catasrophize without waiting for something of substance. Your speculation on something that may not even happen creates an false illusion of what you think already is. Man. If you are a female, I give you more leverage to freak out; however, if you are a man. Smh.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
01-10-2018, 01:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,178 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Are you jumping on the quitter bandwagon too?

I wonder if any of you are capable of being responsible full functioning adults. How can you expect to be a leader to your kids and spouse if ya'll catasrophize without waiting for something of substance. Your speculation on something that may not even happen creates an false illusion of what you think already is. Man. If you are a female, I give you more leverage to freak out; however, if you are a man. Smh.

Does putting sexist comments out there really get you and other Dreamers off or something?
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
01-10-2018, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
0 AP


Probably one of better pictures of Senator Cornyn.
__________________
LPR these days
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
01-10-2018, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Dec 2010
3,448 posts
BestBefore1984's Avatar
BestBefore1984
BestBefore1984
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BestBefore1984
Find all posts by BestBefore1984
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUSenior View Post
Does putting sexist comments out there really get you and other Dreamers off or something?

I respect your decision to disagree. Just to satisfy my curiousity, how was that sexist? You do know that men and women are biologically different, right? One of these is that women tend to be more emotional. Nothing sexist about that.

Sexist is when I went to a bar in San Francisco and was told by the bouncer that I have to pay a $20 cover while my girlfriend gets in for free. Mind you, this is in one of the most liberal cities, that values so called gender “equality”

Back on topic. We will be good.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
01-10-2018, 02:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,178 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
I respect your decision to disagree. Just to satisfy my curiousity, how was that sexist? You do know that men and women are biologically different, right? One of these is that women tend to be more emotional. Nothing sexist about that.

Sexist is when I went to a bar in San Francisco and was told by the bouncer that I have to pay a $20 cover while my girlfriend gets in for free. Mind you, this is in one of the most liberal cities, that values so called gender “equality”

Back on topic. We will be good.
I think the situation you mention is sexist as well. But arguing that men need to be creatures who are to show no emotion and women are just disposed to show emoton is inherently sexist as well. It's sexist because it perpetuates dangerous and incorrect stereotypes. Hillary Clinton was far from the perfect candidate but the idea of women being controlled by their emotions was utilized discredit her unfairly. Voters actually said that they didn't see a woman being able to become president because of this reasons even though there is little evidence to show that these stereotypes are true.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
01-10-2018, 02:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
618 posts
hopeful_in_nyc
hopeful_in_nyc
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hopeful_in_nyc
Find all posts by hopeful_in_nyc
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUSenior View Post
I think the situation you mention is sexist as well. But arguing that men need to be creatures who are to show no emotion and women are just disposed to show emoton is inherently sexist as well. It's sexist because it perpetuates dangerous and incorrect stereotypes. Hillary Clinton was far from the perfect candidate but the idea of women being controlled by their emotions was utilized discredit her unfairly. Voters actually said that they didn't see a woman being able to become president because of this reasons even though there is little evidence to show that these stereotypes are true.
Okay guys, #timesup
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.