• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Trump Likely Has Authority To Extend DACA Deadline, Experts Say

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
02-08-2018, 03:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Legal experts dispute a claim from some senior Trump administration officials that President Donald Trump lacks the legal authority to extend his own deadline for ending an immigration program that protects nearly 700,00 people from deportation.

Senior White House and Cabinet officials in recent days have sent mixed messages about whether Trump could merely amend a September executive order that gave Congress until March 5 to legalize the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

There is no consistency in the administration’s stance, with lawmakers and experts saying the various messages only further cloud an already murky legal question.

In one camp are Trump and officials like Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders signaling the president could merely change that deadline if lawmakers and White House negotiators need more time to strike an immigration deal. Some legal experts argue he could do so through a new executive order.

But in another are immigration hardliners like White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. They have stated the president lacks the legal authority to alter his own deadline, a stance echoed in conversations with other White House aides.

But some legal experts say the office of the presidency possesses the authority to change a program termination deadline set via an executive order. After all, a president would not be altering an existing law.

“The original deadline was arbitrary and he could set another arbitrary deadline,” said Andrew Rudalevige, a professor at Maine’s Bowdoin College who specializes in studying the presidency.

“While you could argue the DACA program should have ended immediately — as unlawful — once you set a transition deadline in the first place, there’s no real bar to saying that ‘administrative convenience’ or some such mandates an extension of that deadline,” Rudalevige added.

Another legal source was asked whether the Trump-Sanders camp is on firmer legal ground. She replied: “That’s probably true,” adding a second executive order amending the first one on DACA likely would be sufficient.


Theresa Cardinal Brown, a former senior Department of Homeland Security immigration official in the George W. Bush administration, sees no clear legal hurdle that would prevent any president from amending a program-ending order with a new order.

But she cautions that unanswered legal questions about the DACA program and how Trump chose to go about ending it create a sizeable grey area on extending the deadline.

“It depends on whether or not you think the original program was unconstitutional. And that has not been decided by the courts,” said Brown, now with the Bipartisan Policy Center. “The September order gave a six-month wind-down to give people a period of time to adjust. Now, whether or not he had the authority to extend it that long has never been tested in court.

“So we don’t really know if an extension would be accepted by the legal system,” she said. Further muddying the waters: It is unclear whether a second order would be challenged in court; but issuing a new one could force Justice Department attorneys to alter their arguments about the legality of the September missive, creating “some bit of legal jeopardy in issuing another order.”


Mixed Messages

Just what Trump and his top aides will decide to do if Congress is unable to come up with an immigration deal that addresses DACA is anyone’s guess.

When the president popped in on a meeting Kelly was having with reporters about a White House immigration plan on the evening of Jan. 24, he signaled he was considering extending the deadline if immigration talks need more time. But he was clear about his stance on whether he has the authority to do so.

“I certainly have the right to that, if I want,” he said.

But that came eight days after Nielsen told the Senate Judiciary Committee just the opposite. Senate Democratic Whip Richard J. Durbin of Illinois asked her if she has concluded Trump lacks the legal power to change the deadline. “Yes,” she replied.

Nielsen’s department, however, struggled to clarify the disconnect between the two camps’ opposite stances.

Acting DHS Press Secretary Tyler Houlton sent Roll Call a lengthy statement when asked to spell out the legal underpinning of Nielsen’s stance. “Given the attorney general’s determination that the previous DACA policy was likely unlawful and unconstitutional, the administration is fully committed to that deadline,” Houlton said.

The statement did not directly address the legal basis, other than to stress the president determined DACA unconstitutional. He also claimed Nielsen had never said Trump lacks the authority to set a new deadline, and then did not respond to a follow-up email when a reporter shared the Durbin exchange from a transcript of the Jan. 16 hearing.

Kelly went to Capitol Hill on Tuesday and reiterated his assessment that he is “not so sure this president has the authority to extend it,” according to the Washington Post. He reportedly noted Obama created the program via executive order, meaning it is not an actual law.

The chief of staff’s assessment, however, is flawed: Presidents lack the authority to just change laws passed by Congress. They can adjust implementation — but not unilaterally order programs etched in law be terminated.

Hours later on Tuesday, Sanders took another stance when asked about a presidential extension: “He certainly has the right to do so.”


On Wednesday, White House aides were unable to provide a clear answer on whether the president has the requisite legal authorities. They also struggled to say definitely if White House officials asked the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel or a similar legal shop within the government to weigh in. (The Justice Department’s public affairs office did not return requests for comment on the matter.)

The best one White House official could do was try to clarify Kelly’s Tuesday remark, but even that clarification appeared at odds with the retired Marine’s stance: “I think what Gen. Kelly was referring to was the president’s determination that the DACA program was not legal.”
https://www.rollcall.com/news/politi...ne-experts-say
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
#2
02-08-2018, 03:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
510 posts
pavpatel
0 AP
Pigs will fly before Trump extends DACA, just my opinion
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
pavpatel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pavpatel
Find all posts by pavpatel
#3
02-08-2018, 04:04 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,722 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
I'm so confused. Why would he extend it when he/his administration has already asked the SCOTUS for an expedited service on the DACA injunction?

__________________
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right."
-Albus Dumbledore
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vft1008
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vft1008
Find all posts by vft1008
#4
02-08-2018, 04:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
5,606 posts
JJ Glo's Avatar
JJ Glo
60 AP
I doubt he would extend it. He would probably ask Congress to pass an extension (Bridge Act) if it comes to that.
__________________
Self filed AOS │Apps Received By USCIS - 3/18/19 │Biometrics Done - 4/11/19
Interview Scheduled - 4/24/19│Interview Date - 5/31/19│AOS Approval - 5/31/19
Permanent Resident Card Received - 6/8/19
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JJ Glo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JJ Glo
Find all posts by JJ Glo
#5
02-08-2018, 04:12 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2018
78 posts
TonyM203
0 AP
He deemed it unconstitutional, how is he gonna extend it?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TonyM203
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TonyM203
Find all posts by TonyM203
#6
02-08-2018, 05:12 PM
Member
Joined in Nov 2012
49 posts
dexter
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyM203 View Post
He deemed it unconstitutional, how is he gonna extend it?
Presidents dont deem anything unconstitutional, that's the supreme court's job. DACA is an executive order which he has full control of, as long as the SCOTUS doesnt deem it unconstitutional.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dexter
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dexter
Find all posts by dexter
#7
02-08-2018, 05:38 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,722 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexter View Post
Presidents dont deem anything unconstitutional, that's the supreme court's job. DACA is an executive order which he has full control of, as long as the SCOTUS doesnt deem it unconstitutional.
But he basically is asking SCOTUS to hurry up and deem it unconstitutional.

__________________
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right."
-Albus Dumbledore
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vft1008
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vft1008
Find all posts by vft1008
#8
02-08-2018, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
381 posts
Gnome's Avatar
Gnome
0 AP
What deadline, though? I thought the March 5th was null the minute the CA judge reinstated DACA renewals until SCOTUS issues a decision. But that could extend into the summer. What am I missing?
__________________

Specialist at top tech company
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Gnome
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Gnome
Find all posts by Gnome
#9
02-08-2018, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
From New York City
Joined in Apr 2010
731 posts
nydreamer's Avatar
nydreamer
0 AP
What deadline is he going to extend? The one were they have until March 5th to come up with something? Not like that helps. Sure, extend until 2080.
__________________
Initial Approval: 9/14/12
Renewed: 9/2/14; 8/20/16; 4/6/18; 2/21/20; 2/20/22
Latest Renewal: 10/31/23
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
nydreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nydreamer
Find all posts by nydreamer
#10
02-09-2018, 04:03 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,567 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Amending adminstrative actions is indeed possible by the possible. Still, I highly doubtful that he will do so.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.