• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Republicans to Democrats: " There Will Be NO Bipartisan Immigration Bill"

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
01-23-2025, 10:16 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Senate Republicans are making it clear they will pursue a border package without Democratic input, despite the obstacles they face in going their own way.

Quote:
WASHINGTON — Key Senate Republicans rejected a request by a group of moderate Democrats to jettison their party-line efforts on immigration and instead work on a bipartisan solution.

The decision shows the GOP's determination to go their own way on one of President Donald Trump's top priorities, despite their wafer-thin House majority and other obstacles in the way of passing his agenda.
Democrats are also divided over the issue of immigration, and a significant faction of lawmakers in purple states and districts are staking out more conservative stances on the issue.

Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a negotiator of past immigration deals, said the GOP isn't going to rely on Democrats for a deal to beef up immigration enforcement.

“On border security, no,” Graham told NBC News, making it clear that the GOP will instead use the Senate's arcane budget process to bypass a filibuster and effectively cut out Democrats.

The push came in a letter Wednesday to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., which was led by Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., and signed by 12 other Democrats, most of them from politically competitive states.

“We understand that Senate Republicans have discussed using the budget reconciliation process to advance border security budget measures without any Democratic input. While that’s your right, in working together on a bipartisan basis, we can achieve the best outcome for the American people,” the Democrats wrote. “We remain ready to work with you in good faith to craft legislation that can achieve bipartisan support and 60 votes in the Senate.”

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., laughed out loud when he was asked about the letter and whether Republicans might accept the overture.

“That’s a letter we will ignore,” Johnson said in an interview.

“We’re not going to wait for them. If they want to secure the border, they could have done that,” he added. “That’s not what they want.”

Thune's office had no immediate comment on the letter, which was signed by a similar group of Democrats who voted to help Republicans pass the Laken Riley Act this week. The bill, which is headed to Trump's desk, tightens current law to impose mandatory federal detention of unauthorized immigrants charged with or convicted of committing nonviolent crimes like theft and shoplifting.

Democrats in battleground states and districts are breaking with the bulk of their party over immigration, as they believe the positions of progressives and leaders of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus are out of touch with their voters. Democrats got clobbered on the issue of immigration in the 2024 election and lost Latino men to Trump.

Another skeptic of the Democratic request is Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., who negotiated a bipartisan immigration deal in 2018 to authorize $25 billion for a border wall and to protect “Dreamers,” or people brought to the country unlawfully as children. Trump’s White House pressured Republicans to kill that agreement then.

“There is a group of us that would like to work together on immigration, but I don’t know what [Kelly] means by not doing anything on reconciliation. I don’t know how that fits in,” Rounds said Thursday. “If your question is: Will we delay funding the border needs until we could do a bipartisan approach? The answer to that is probably not. We do anticipate using reconciliation to bolster our defense, both totally but also at the border, as well.”

Rounds said Republicans have every intention of using the 50-vote budget process to beef up federal border enforcement.

“The one thing that we do know is that we can pick up resources under reconciliation for the defense of the border, and I would expect that we’ll continue to do that,” he said.

Asked about Republicans’ rebuffing his request, Kelly said: “Well, let’s see what they’re able to do in reconciliation. As you’re aware, folks in the House are having a hard time figuring out what they can get in there and what they can’t.”

He added that a bipartisan deal wouldn’t be subject to the limits of the reconciliation process, in which “you can’t do policy” changes.

The GOP push hasn’t yet gotten off the ground as the party continues to debate whether to move Trump’s ambitious agenda in one big package or break it up into two bills. Many are nervous about the slim House Republican majority, seeing it as an obstacle.

Graham said Republicans want to give Trump $100 billion to crack down on illegal immigration as he eyes a mass deportation program and issues a flurry of executive orders.

Graham said that if Congress doesn’t give Trump the resources soon, he won’t be able to carry out his plans.

“Well, I think you hit a wall pretty quickly,” Graham said. “You’re going to need the new money, and I worry about it.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ill-rcna189033
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
01-23-2025, 10:25 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
PapiChulo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PapiChulo
Find all posts by PapiChulo
0 AP
It's Joever.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
01-23-2025, 10:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapiChulo View Post
It's Joever.
Pretty much. You have 12 Democratic Senators who are looking to take a hard line on immigration and Schumer has given them the green light.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
01-23-2025, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
PapiChulo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PapiChulo
Find all posts by PapiChulo
0 AP
Trump is the only key to all this.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
01-23-2025, 10:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapiChulo View Post
It's Joever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapiChulo View Post
Trump is the only key to all this.
I doubt they will help us. Democrats are spineless, he doesn't need them, and they have already caved anyways. You really think Democrats will help us? I think not. The Laken Riley act was a warning shot for us by the Democrats.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
01-23-2025, 10:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
PapiChulo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PapiChulo
Find all posts by PapiChulo
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copper View Post
I doubt they will help us. Democrats are spineless, he doesn't need them, and they have already caved anyways. You really think Democrats will help us? I think not. The Laken Riley act was a warning shot for us by the Democrats.
I meant Trump is the only key to our situation, he will tell Republicans to just codify DACA since he said he wants a "fix" this is the best case scenario.
Last edited by PapiChulo; 01-23-2025 at 10:46 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
01-23-2025, 10:46 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,699 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
vft1008
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vft1008
Find all posts by vft1008
0 AP
I've said it since the beginning: Dems are not going to give Trump any win on immigration.
Don't depend on congress for your solution. They are utterly useless.
Work on your own solution or be at the mercy of a congress that doesn't even care about its own federal workers and citizens.
__________________
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right."
-Albus Dumbledore
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
01-24-2025, 12:27 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,236 posts
hDreamer1988
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
0 AP
This is all theatre in the beginning. The GOP needs to show their voters that they are filling their "Mandate". Just like the Dems did when Biden and Obama first took office, they will go at it alone.. after than, they will try the bipartisan route. No use helping Dems who are in danger of losing their seat
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
01-24-2025, 12:37 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
PapiChulo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PapiChulo
Find all posts by PapiChulo
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988 View Post
This is all theatre in the beginning. The GOP needs to show their voters that they are filling their "Mandate". Just like the Dems did when Biden and Obama first took office, they will go at it alone.. after than, they will try the bipartisan route. No use helping Dems who are in danger of losing their seat
So what's your prediction?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
01-24-2025, 11:19 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
4,594 posts
DogJuiceMan's Avatar
DogJuiceMan
DogJuiceMan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DogJuiceMan
Find all posts by DogJuiceMan
0 AP
Now that they have enough vulnerable dems that vote with Republicans they can do whatever they want with zero blockages. This is all just the beginning and we'll be lucky to get anything at all.
__________________
Concept of 彁
Tariffs are taxes.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.