• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

New GOP immigration bill would prevent separation of children and parents at border

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#1
06-13-2018, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Dec 2010
3,448 posts
BestBefore1984's Avatar
BestBefore1984
BestBefore1984
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BestBefore1984
Find all posts by BestBefore1984
0 AP
Quote:

WASHINGTON — The compromise GOP immigration bill currently being crafted in the House will include a provision that says children will not be separated from their parents at the border.

Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., one of the moderate Republicans involved in negotiations over the legislation, said that the provision will be included in the yet-to-be-written text of the measure. A senior GOP aide confirmed the provision to NBC and said that Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., briefed House Republicans last week that it would be included in any bill that’s crafted.

In addition to protecting the 1.8 million Dreamers who came to the U.S. illegally as children, the compromise bill would also eliminate the diversity lottery and include $25 billion for border security, Denham told reporters Wednesday afternoon. He said that leadership is committed to completing the text of the bill this week.

Denham is a member of the group of moderate Republicans who spearheaded a discharge petition that sought to force floor votes on immigration measures. Late Tuesday, moderates reached a deal with conservatives to allow two votes on the House floor next week — one on a compromise immigration bill and one on a conservative bill sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.

The House will vote next week on the compromise legislation, along with a conservative immigration bill, as part of the deal worked out Tuesday between moderates and conservatives. As of now, only a general outline of the compromise bill has been completed.

Ryan said Wednesday that the White House is on board with the Hill GOP's decision hold immigration votes next week.

"I said before, the last thing I want to do is bring a bill out of here that I know the president won’t support," Ryan, R-Wis., said at a weekly leadership press conference. "Well, we have been working hand in glove with the administration on this to make sure we are bringing a bill that represents the president’s four pillars so that we can come together."

The speaker told Republicans Wednesday morning that he had spoken to President Trump about the plan, and that the president was excited about it, according a person inside the House GOP conference meeting Wednesday.

“It will protect all Dreamers — those that signed up for DACA, those that did not but were eligible, as well as those that have been aged in,” Denham told reporters earlier Wednesday, after House Republicans met behind closed doors at the Capitol Hill Club.

Ryan said Wednesday that members have agreed to the process that would lead to votes on the two bills next week, but that many of them would "reserve judgment" on the compromise bill until the final text emerged.

Moderates said that legislation would provide “certainty for every Dreamer that’s out there,” said Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Calif., another discharge petition sponsor, after the meeting Wednesday.

While Curbelo and Denham said that the compromise bill would reflect President Trump’s four pillars on immigration — border security, addressing DACA, the diversity visa lottery and family-based migration — both declined to offer additional details beyond the general idea that it would address 1.8 million Dreamers.

“Our goal has been to have a permanent fix for Dreamers given the certainty that they need, address the 1.8 million Dreamers that are out there today and then also give them a pathway forward so they’re not only here, protecting them, but allowing them to work and go to school and signing up for military as well,” said Denham.

Both lawmakers said they are not abandoning the discharge petition, which requires 218 signatures in order to trigger floor votes on a wider range of immigration proposals. On Tuesday night, the moderates fell two signatures short of the threshold, which prevents them from holding a vote this month. If the compromise plan fails next week, moderates could still return to the petition and potentially hold votes next month.

“It’s important for people to remain committed to it, because it’s there if we need it. And we may need it,” said Curbelo.

Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., an ardent Trump supporter who had signed the discharge petition out of frustration about a lack of action on immigration, said that the plan is to include “85 percent” of Republican priorities, including the DACA piece, in the compromise bill in order for the conference to coalesce around it.

In July, the House will address the agriculture piece such as the dairy workers who Collins said are undocumented in his district, an e-Verify program and H-2C year-long visas.

“That will be a separate issue voted on in July,” said Collins, who said that the compromise reached Tuesday is a “mission accomplished” for those who had signed the petition.
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...-votes-n882756


Not sure if this was aforementioned, if so please close mods (or delete).

Not sure why this needs to be included in the bills; this shouldn't be happening to begin with. That's some sketch human rights violation that the Nazi's did as they separated families through their raids.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
06-13-2018, 04:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
0 AP
i hope this will seal the deal for EVERYONE.

that separating children from their parents is fucked up.

trump is also considering building detention camps for these separated children.

how tf can people here stan on trump this hard when he does shit like that?
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
06-13-2018, 04:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian1776 View Post
i hope this will seal the deal for EVERYONE.

that separating children from their parents is fucked up.

trump is also considering building detention camps for these separated children.

how tf can people here stan on trump this hard when he does shit like that?
Having that provision should be a HUGE ass incentive for Dems to vote in favor of such compromise because shit is getting super crazy at the border.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
06-13-2018, 04:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
774 posts
Transcend's Avatar
Transcend
Transcend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Transcend
Find all posts by Transcend
0 AP
Here we go again! Keep throwing in unrelated crap until it stinks and nobody wants to touch it.
__________________
Approved: 10/01/2012

"We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness." -G.O., 1984
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#5
06-13-2018, 04:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
774 posts
Transcend's Avatar
Transcend
Transcend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Transcend
Find all posts by Transcend
0 AP
Why are politicians like this? They are too scared to go bold and start with something big like CIR but when there's a chance to pass something narrow, they start adding a whole lot of stuff onto it.
__________________
Approved: 10/01/2012

"We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness." -G.O., 1984
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#6
06-13-2018, 04:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
0 AP
i think its a win-win for everyone if we stop separating children from their parents to be sent to military camps.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Transcend View Post
Here we go again! Keep throwing in unrelated crap until it stinks and nobody wants to touch it.
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#7
06-13-2018, 04:45 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,457 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Having that provision should be a HUGE ass incentive for Dems to vote in favor of such compromise because shit is getting super crazy at the border.
The fact this administration needs a law to be passed for them to stop separating children and parents is ridiculous.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#8
06-13-2018, 04:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
774 posts
Transcend's Avatar
Transcend
Transcend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Transcend
Find all posts by Transcend
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian1776 View Post
i think its a win-win for everyone if we stop separating children from their parents to be sent to military camps.
It's a humanitarian issue that has positive coverage and a decent chance of being resolved on its own. There is truly no reason for it to be added to our issue.
__________________
Approved: 10/01/2012

"We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness." -G.O., 1984
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#9
06-13-2018, 04:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
Imagine Dems voting no on a compromise that includes this provision to protect children . . . . . .huge incentive for them to vote yes . . . .
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#10
06-13-2018, 04:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swim19 View Post
The fact this administration needs a law to be passed for them to stop separating children and parents is ridiculous.
I agree with that. But, the separations are happening, and those kids need to be protected.

For Dems, diversity lottery or protect children . . . .
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.