• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Judge bars Trump fast-track deportation policy....

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
09-28-2019, 06:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,711 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...40f_story.html

Quote:
Judge bars Trump fast-track deportation policy, saying threat to legal migrants was not assessed

By Spencer S. HsuSeptember 28 at 2:45 PM
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from dramatically expanding its power to deport migrants who have illegally entered the United States in the past two years by using a fast-track deportation process that bypasses immigration judges.

In a 126-page ruling, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a nationwide preliminary injunction shortly before midnight Friday, halting enforcement of the administration’s July 23 policy widening application of the “expedited removal” program to undocumented immigrants anywhere in the country who entered over the past two years.

Previously, only migrants caught within 100 miles of the border who illegally had entered within the preceding two weeks were subject to deportation without access to courts or lawyers.

[Trump administration to expand its power to deport undocumented immigrants]

Jackson ruled that the suing immigration advocacy groups, Make the Road New York, LUPE (La Unión del Pueblo Entero) and We Count, were likely to prevail in ongoing litigation and show irreparable harm being suffered by those they represent, including many legal immigrants and asylum seekers who could be swept up and expelled from the country without legal recourse.

“The court’s decision to stop the expansion of this process will protect hundreds of thousands of longtime U.S. residents from being deported without a court hearing and prevents the country from becoming a ‘show me your papers’ regime,” said Trina Realmuto, a directing attorney at the American Immigration Council, which argued the case alongside the American Civil Liberties Union.

Jackson rejected the Department of Homeland Security’s argument that it has authority under immigration law to bypass federal notice and rulemaking requirements, saying it was likely that plaintiffs would be able to prove the sweeping change was “arbitrary and capricious, and therefore unlawful, because DHS failed to address significant flaws in the expedited removal system,” and because it ignored the impact of the expansion “on settled documented noncitizens and their communities.”

The ruling came hours after a federal judge in Los Angeles, U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee, separately blocked the Trump administration from implementing rules vastly expanding its ability to detain migrant children with their parents for indefinite periods.

Nearly 300,000 of the approximately 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the United States could be subject to expedited removal, according to the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. The typical undocumented immigrant has lived in the United States for 15 years, according to the Pew Research Center.

In announcing the policy in July, acting Department of Homeland Security chief Kevin McAleenan said “the implementation of additional measures is a necessary response to the ongoing immigration crisis.”

In a statement Saturday, a Justice Department spokesman said, “Congress expressly authorized the Secretary of Homeland Security to act with dispatch to remove from the country aliens who have no right to be here. The district court’s decision squarely conflicts with that express grant of authority and vastly exceeds the district court’s own authority.”

Officials said the new strategy responds to an influx of Central Americans and others across the southern border. The change allows the U.S. government to crank up deportations despite huge backlogs in understaffed immigration courts and the high cost of prisonlike detention centers run by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Under the new policy, any immigrants apprehended in the United States would have to prove to immigration officials that they have lived inside the country continuously for the past two years, or they could end up in immigration jails, facing summary expulsion.

Immigration lawyers said the unprecedented expansion effectively would make U.S. agents both “judge and prosecutor,” denying immigrants due process before the court or access to lawyers.

“Under this unlawful plan, immigrants who have lived here for years would be deported with less due process than people get in traffic court,” said ACLU Immigrant’s Rights Project director Omar Jadwat.

McAleenan, in a federal notice, wrote that the new rule “will reduce incentives” for migrants to enter the United States without authorization and swiftly move away from the border to avoid the faster deportation process.

Federal officials said they could make exceptions for people with serious medical conditions or “substantial connections” to the United States, and they said deportation would not necessarily be immediate. Officials said they have safeguards for migrants who might be U.S. citizens or legal residents.

Asylum officers will interview immigrants who fear returning to their home countries, to determine whether they qualify for asylum or another form of protection, and officers potentially could refer them to full deportation proceedings. Unaccompanied minors from non-neighboring countries are not eligible for speedy deportations under federal law.

The U.S. government invoked its authority to fast-track deportations of undocumented immigrants who arrived by sea in 2002, after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. President George W. Bush expanded the program in 2004 to apply to all undocumented immigrants, however they entered the country, who are caught within 14 days within 100 miles of the border. The Bush administration said that issuing removal orders deterred migrants from trying to reenter the United States because that provision made it easier to charge them criminally if they were caught again.

Expedited deportations soared from about 50,000 in 2004 to 193,000 in 2013, about 44 percent of the total number of people deported that year, according to the American Immigration Council.

Since 2017, the caseload in immigration courts has soared to more than 900,000 cases, and ICE has more than 50,000 migrants in custody each day, a record.

In her opinion, Jackson noted that DHS implemented its “New Designation policy” about 2½ years after Trump signed an executive order to expand expedited removals to the fullest extent possible, which he did shortly after his swearing-in, without ever issuing a proposed rule or notice or soliciting public comment.

The Trump administration argued that its new program is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act’s public-comment requirements and that DHS sought comments on the change when announcing its launch. It said the policy would have taken effect Sept. 1 but told the court it has not yet been applied.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#2
09-28-2019, 06:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,711 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
This is a big ruling which at least for now provides protection against expedited removal. The short version is that in the past if someone was suspected of being undocumented within 100 miles to a land border, and they couldn't prove they had been here for the last 2 years, had lied about citizenship, etc. they would be on the fast track (2 weeks) to being deported without getting a hearing.

The rule change the current administration had enacted would make that be the case for ANYWHERE in the US. If someone picked up in LA and they couldn't prove A. they were here legally, or they couldn't prove they had been here for 2 years continuously, bam! On the bus.

Remember that legal immigrants who aren't citizens also have to have proof of their legal status on them at all times. One of the lawyers I listen to often also had mentioned keeping a copy of their lease and electric bills on them in case they were ever picked up. Hell,I scanned like 12 years' worth of bills and kept the pdfs on the cloud just in case.

I guess it doesn't hurt to have that stuff ready to go in case the Dream Act is passed but still, it took some effort to go through a big box of old bills going back to the 90's.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#3
09-28-2019, 07:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
2,169 posts
jwxie518's Avatar
jwxie518
0 AP
Ok. Ok
__________________
All I want is to travel freely where I like.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jwxie518
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jwxie518
Find all posts by jwxie518
#4
09-29-2019, 12:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
444 posts
Hallowpoint1911
0 AP
Trump and miller keep going at it and judges keep giving them the finger.
__________________
-Never Trust a Politician
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Hallowpoint1911
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Hallowpoint1911
Find all posts by Hallowpoint1911


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.