DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

[AppearsDREAM Act Will Get Senate Vote Next Week, Activists Determined to Get Passage - Page 2

#11
12-09-2010, 10:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamerSD23 View Post
What I don't understand is that why would Reid try to pass the House Version?

If I understand correctly, the House version doesn't include the new stuff he added in S.3993 like lower age to 30, 10 years legal status and etc...

If he couldn't get the Republican votes on the new (watered-down) version, then how in the world is he going to get the Republican votes on the House. version??
Let our Good Reid & Durbin do the dealing on this, they know our interest and I trust they would work with our thoughts as they try to garner the votes, I think the house version is very strict, however, I have not yet read the version. Meantime, our job is to keep calling, e-mailing, faxing. source: House Debate Last Night.
Last edited by dado123; 12-09-2010 at 10:59 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#12
12-09-2010, 11:04 PM
Senior Member
From Oklahoma
Joined in Jul 2007
678 posts
IDim's Avatar
IDim
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamerSD23 View Post
What I don't understand is that why would Reid try to pass the House Version?

If I understand correctly, the House version doesn't include the new stuff he added in S.3993 like lower age to 30, 10 years legal status and etc...

If he couldn't get the Republican votes on the new (watered-down) version, then how in the world is he going to get the Republican votes on the House. version??
The House version has all the things you mentioned and more. It requires us to pay a fine as well. The House version is even stricter than the Senate version, the Senate version is the "watered down" version.
__________________

Their green grass is green. Our green grass is brown.

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#13
12-09-2010, 11:07 PM
Member
From orlando
Joined in Nov 2010
46 posts
sexy
0 AP
yes the house version is s.3993
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#14
12-09-2010, 11:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2009
1,329 posts
ari88
0 AP
yeah why did republicans want to vote on it today and before they didn't? lol
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#15
12-10-2010, 12:31 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
343 posts
dreamberry's Avatar
dreamberry
210 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari88 View Post
yeah why did republicans want to vote on it today and before they didn't? lol
It was guaranteed to fail if brought up today, and that is what they wanted.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#16
12-10-2010, 01:06 AM
BANNED
Joined in Dec 2010
374 posts
theboys2010
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari88 View Post
yeah why did republicans want to vote on it today and before they didn't? lol

The republicans have the votes to kill it so Reid tabled it in cloture so it will give them more time to try and get some additional votes. You need 8 republicans to flip or some of the democrats to flip there vote.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#17
12-10-2010, 01:58 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
139 posts
arthur352
170 AP
Quick question since there is no need to have cloture on this bill since it is a conciliated bill from the house wont they need just a simple majority like 51 or is it still 60. Because if you think about it they aren't voting for cloture or to end debate they are voting on an already finished bill.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#18
12-10-2010, 02:15 AM
Senior Member
From Oklahoma
Joined in Jul 2007
678 posts
IDim's Avatar
IDim
0 AP
No, they still need 60 votes.
__________________

Their green grass is green. Our green grass is brown.

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#19
12-10-2010, 09:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2009
756 posts
Diplok
29 AP
A simply majority (51) is all that is needed if Republicans weren't hell bent on filibustering everything that moves through the senate, but since common sense has been thrown out the window and this incarnation of Republicans will filibuster, then we need a super majority (60) in order to get business done in Washington.
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.