• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

NEWS: AB 540 reopened for debate Thread 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
09-24-2008, 04:48 AM
Member
Joined in Jun 2007
96 posts
richard777
0 AP
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...BANQ12UI6C.DTL

What should we do??????!!!!!!


Appeal options:

To help you guys understand the California court process, please refer to the following document:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/c.../casescome.pdf

There is a scary fact from the above statement:

A party who does not like the outcome in the Court of Appeal can seek further review by the California Supreme Court. This is done by a petition for review, which is a document that resembles a brief.

The main job of the California Supreme Court is to promote justice by overseeing the development and consistency of the law. It is not a court of last resort to make sure every case was handled correctly. Therefore, it has no obligation to review every decision of the Court of Appeal. In fact, it receives thousands of petitions for review every year and it grants fewer than 5 percent of them.


only 5% of them? I couldn't count on it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
richard777
View Public Profile
Send a private message to richard777
Find all posts by richard777
#2
09-24-2008, 06:43 PM
Senior Member
From San Francisco Bay Area
Joined in Oct 2007
637 posts
MAGraduate's Avatar
MAGraduate
0 AP
Maybe you can try spreading awareness of one key fact -- that most students at UC's that benefit from AB-540, an overwhelming majority, in fact, are U.S. citizens.

But we don't need to do anything. The court judges told the legislators that they can merely fix the bill by explicitly carving exceptions for non-citizen students as is allowed under another federal law.

I would suggest to just go to school and keep paying your in-state tuition rates. That isn't about to change.
__________________
Founder, Managing Attorney at Lal Legal
Formerly Undocumented
J.D., The George Washington University Law School, 2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MAGraduate
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MAGraduate
Find all posts by MAGraduate


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.