• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Immigration reform effort is very much alive says Senator Charles Schumer

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#1
04-17-2010, 08:48 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2006
3,617 posts
lilbawler2001's Avatar
lilbawler2001
50 AP
Quote:
Schumer also said that the bill would create a new tamper-proof ID card. "Think of it as a security card with your picture," he said.
Schumer revealed that immigrants would be eligible for green cards within as little as three months if the bill became law.
Schumer's bill would replace the current family-based immigration system with one that awards points to prospective immigrants based on skills.
http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Imm...-91146984.html
__________________
Application Sent - 8/22 Chicago Lockbox
Delivered - 8/24
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 9/04
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/28
Date of EAD and Daca approval - 11/30
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
lilbawler2001
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lilbawler2001
Find all posts by lilbawler2001
#2
04-17-2010, 09:57 AM
Senior Member
From Brooklyn NY
Joined in Feb 2009
676 posts
Alex's Avatar
Alex
0 AP
What does this donkey mean when he says:

"bill would replace the current family-based immigration system with one that awards points to prospective immigrants based on skills. "

I understand creating a points system like in Canada, BUT would that mean that he will eliminate family sponsorship petitions??.. hes saying that you can't bring your spouse anymore? or your parents?...

the reason I'm asking is because I wonder that when they do deport my ass out of here, I wanna know if my fiance could still try and bring me back after a while. (?)

this guy is dangerous
__________________
IUF
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alex
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex
Find all posts by Alex
#3
04-17-2010, 10:45 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Apr 2010
5 posts
Sigmahat's Avatar
Sigmahat
0 AP
"A measure unveiled last month by Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, and Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, aims to reshape the legal system to give priority to high-skilled, high-earning immigrants, offering narrower channels for low-wage workers." - New York Times :Work Force Fueled by Highly Skilled Immigrants
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sigmahat
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Sigmahat
Find all posts by Sigmahat
#4
04-17-2010, 12:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
329 posts
swordfish
0 AP
Quote:
"We need Republican support on this," he said. "We don't want Lindsey Graham out there on his own."
Democrats are so full of shit: They didn't needed a single co-sponsor for healthcare now that they found one republican, they want another one.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swordfish
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swordfish
Find all posts by swordfish
#5
04-17-2010, 12:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2010
239 posts
OrlandoDREAM Act
20 AP
Back in 2007 the advocates refused to support the deal on the table. Ther was a story where they said "mejor que no pase" (better that it doesn't pass) because of the petition program. I say do it. See, at least people wil be able to work and drive and not be in fear. They then be able to go back and forward and send more money. Maybe even pay for college so they cna get more points.

and if the system really sucks, you can always change it or make modifications. and if not, at least people would be getting legal status and eventually become citizens. many of those complaining back in 2007 have bene deported or left because they had no other choice. others are being exploited and living in fear. and some of you here might be out of college and working.

just keep your eye on the ball and remember we are not in charge or on a position to demand too much.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
OrlandoDREAM Act
View Public Profile
Send a private message to OrlandoDREAM Act
Find all posts by OrlandoDREAM Act
#6
04-17-2010, 01:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrlandoDREAM Act View Post
Back in 2007 the advocates refused to support the deal on the table. Ther was a story where they said "mejor que no pase" (better that it doesn't pass) because of the petition program. I say do it. See, at least people wil be able to work and drive and not be in fear. They then be able to go back and forward and send more money. Maybe even pay for college so they cna get more points.

and if the system really sucks, you can always change it or make modifications. and if not, at least people would be getting legal status and eventually become citizens. many of those complaining back in 2007 have bene deported or left because they had no other choice. others are being exploited and living in fear. and some of you here might be out of college and working.

just keep your eye on the ball and remember we are not in charge or on a position to demand too much.
beggars can't be choosers.


Haha 4 words summarize it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#7
04-17-2010, 01:48 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
What does this donkey mean when he says:

"bill would replace the current family-based immigration system with one that awards points to prospective immigrants based on skills. "

I understand creating a points system like in Canada, BUT would that mean that he will eliminate family sponsorship petitions??.. hes saying that you can't bring your spouse anymore? or your parents?...

the reason I'm asking is because I wonder that when they do deport my ass out of here, I wanna know if my fiance could still try and bring me back after a while. (?)

this guy is dangerous
Thats a big change if the family-based sponsonship is gone. Canada has both systems.
As little as 3 months is sweet for people who don't qualify for DREAM Act.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#8
04-17-2010, 01:50 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by swordfish View Post
Democrats are so full of shit: They didn't needed a single co-sponsor for healthcare now that they found one republican, they want another one.
Just to be safe that it passes. We already have another Rep (Gregg) and also Scott Brown is interested.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#9
04-17-2010, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
343 posts
dreamberry's Avatar
dreamberry
210 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by swordfish View Post
Democrats are so full of shit: They didn't needed a single co-sponsor for healthcare now that they found one republican, they want another one.
They need at least a handful of Republicans for immigration reform.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamberry
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamberry
Find all posts by dreamberry
#10
04-17-2010, 01:56 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamberry View Post
They need at least a handful of Republicans for immigration reform.
We only need 2.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.