• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Immigration Legislation Gains Traction

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
#1
04-21-2010, 04:20 AM
Member
Joined in Oct 2008
43 posts
tavo305's Avatar
tavo305
tavo305
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tavo305
Find all posts by tavo305
0 AP
WASHINGTON—The effort to pass comprehensive immigration legislation gained some traction Tuesday, as congressional leaders discussed a path to passing the bill this year and President Barack Obama wooed Republican Sen. Scott Brown to support it.

Conventional wisdom has been that the issue is too volatile for action in an election year, and that other matters would take priority. But immigration advocacy groups have been pressing hard for action.

At a Capitol Hill meeting Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that he was committed to bringing the legislation to the floor this year, according to one Democratic leadership aide. The aide said that Ms. Pelosi committed to bringing the bill to the floor if it passed the Senate.

A second leadership aide familiar with the meeting said Ms. Pelosi spoke about the importance of the legislation and agreed to try to advance the measure.

Sens. Chuck Schumer (D, N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R, S.C.) have released a blueprint for legislation that includes a path to citizenship for those here illegally. The blueprint also calls for a guest worker program and for controls aimed at stopping the flow of future illegal immigrants.

But Mr. Graham has said he doesn't want to introduce it without at least one more Republican co-sponsor. At an Oval Office meeting last month, Mr. Obama promised to help find another.

He appeared to be making good on his promise on Tuesday, when he called Sen. Brown from Air Force One Tuesday to pitch the legislation.

Sen. Brown said in an interview Tuesday that the president was giving him a heads up that immigration was coming "down the pike" in about a month, and he should give it some serious thought. That's a quicker timetable than most have expected, but it may have been the president's way to trying to convey momentum for the issue.

"I told him I have an open mind," Mr. Brown said. "I will read anything."

He later added that he wasn't committing to support the measure. "When I said I have an open mind, it means I have an open mind to read the bill," Mr. Brown said. "That doesn't mean that I will vote for granting amnesty to anyone. But I want to be respectful to the president and to any member who brings me a proposal."

The White House reiterated the president's support for the measure. "We're obviously in consultation with both Republicans and Democrats to find a bipartisan solution to what is a very large problem, and one that we think will be addressed very soon," spokesman Bill Burton said.

Democratic commitment to advancing an immigration bill this year was in doubt, given the number of others issues on the agenda. Those include passing new regulations for the financial services industry and nominating a Supreme Court justice.

Meantime, a one-time backer of an immigration-law overhaul continued to distance himself from it. Sen. John McCain, facing a tough Republican primary in Arizona, cosponsored an immigration measure in 2007. On Tuesday, he suggested that Senate Republicans should block the Schumer-Graham bill until U.S. borders are secure, according to an account in The Hill, a publication that covers Capitol Hill.

"I believe that we can convince our Republican colleagues that we have to secure the border first," Mr. McCain said during an appearance on KFYI radio in Arizona, according to The Hill. "There's no point of having immigration reform unless you can have the borders secure first."

This week, Mr. McCain and Sen. Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) proposed a 10-point plan for boosting border sec
urity.

McCain spokeswoman Brooke Buchanan noted in an interview that while running for president, Sen. McCain repeatedly said the borders must be secured before other changes are enact



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...hatsNewsSecond
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
04-21-2010, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
617 posts
gebodupa
gebodupa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gebodupa
Find all posts by gebodupa
0 AP
Quote:
"I told him I have an open mind," Mr. Brown said. "I will read anything."
If this is true and this is how he really is, then I have a lot more support for Sen. Brown than I had before. When he got elected I(and the rest of us) just thought he might be another crazy Republican who only cares about keeping his seat and will just get in the way of CIR any way he can, but given that this is his first term ever he is actually willing to reconsider his stance on certain issues. That, in my opinion, is at least admirable.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
04-21-2010, 01:30 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
0 AP
Secure border first so we will get a 3 Reps to say Yes.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
04-21-2010, 02:57 PM
Senior Member
From Georgia
Joined in Nov 2009
422 posts
Jelly Bean Lover's Avatar
Jelly Bean Lover
Jelly Bean Lover
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jelly Bean Lover
Find all posts by Jelly Bean Lover
120 AP
Securing the border first as a policy is flawed unless it is tied directly to some kind of legalization plan. If they cave in to securing the border first, the next talking point from the right will be, "Deport them all first, then we can talk about legalization." At which point, it obviously becomes a dead issue.

Seriously, the attitude toward immigration reform since the Clinton administration has been to be tough on illegals without offering any hope of adjusting for the people who are stuck here in the shadows. How long do we continue to give inches to the right before we are ready to ask them to give something in return?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.