• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Senate Democrats Adjust Scope of DREAM Act

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
Closed Thread
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 11
  • 21
  • next ›
  • last »
#1
11-22-2010, 04:53 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
783 posts
victor85
280 AP
Quote:
"Revised immigration legislation that Senate Democrats hope to pass in the lame-duck session would reduce the number of people eligible for conditional legal status and maintain a ban on in-state tuition rates for undocumented students, in a bid to gain more support for the measure.

"Late Wednesday 11/17, Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., introduced two new versions of the so-called DREAM Act, which would create a path to conditional legal status for some undocumented children of illegal immigrants who go to college or join the military. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., put both on the Senate calendar Thursday morning.

"In what appears to be an effort to offer options to the bill's critics, one version (S 3962) keeps an eligibility age of younger than 35 for the program, but a second version (S 3963) lowers that age to younger than 30. Versions of the bill in previous sessions had the age pegged at 30 and as low as 25.

"If no other eligibility criteria are changed, the potential number of people eligible would drop slightly, from roughly 2.1 million to slightly more than 2 million, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. Fewer than half of those would probably meet all the bill's criteria.

"In addition, both new versions have been stripped of language that would restore the right to in-state college tuition rates for beneficiaries, a turnaround also geared to win more support from lawmakers.

"Undocumented students have been ineligible for in-state tuition rates since 1996, when Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (PL 104-20. The previous Senate version of the legislation that failed earlier this fall would have restored that right, but the two new versions would not.

Under Pressure
"The changes are intended to win over critics of the legislation, which is on a wish list of bills that Democrats want to pass before they adjourn and lose their majority status in the House in the 112th Congress. After failing to deliver a promised comprehensive immigration overhaul, Democrats are under pressure from activists to pass the narrower legislation in light of Hispanics' strong support for Democratic candidates in the Nov. 2 elections.

"The legislation is contentious not only because of the fraught politics of immigration in both parties, but also because of pressure to pass more sweeping legislation. Some key GOP senators are demanding stronger border security and say they will not support a narrower bill that does not make other changes to immigration laws.

"Utah Republican Orrin G. Hatch said that the age limit in the narrower legislation was not his only concern, though he added he has not focused on the legislation in some time. Hatch authored the original legislation with an age cutoff of 25.

"My empathy is with that type of legislation, and I'll just have to look at it," he said. "They're doing it for purely political reasons, and that's not what I think ought to be done."

"Efforts to pass the legislation in the Senate will probably focus on moderate GOP members whom Democrats often court as allies. The votes of departing lawmakers and the handful of Republicans who supported legislation in the past will also be sought.

"At least two Republicans support the legislation as a stand-alone measure. One is sponsor Richard G. Lugar, R-Ind. Another is Robert F. Bennett of Utah, who is leaving the Senate.

"I support the DREAM Act as free standing legislation, but putting it in a bill that has a number of objectionable aspects is not something I support. If Harry Reid brings it to the floor as a stand-alone bill, I will vote for it," Bennett said in a statement.

"When the Senate voted in September on a defense bill that Reid wanted to amend with the immigration legislation, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, both Arkansas Democrats, voted against the move.

"Lincoln was defeated on Nov. 2, and she said this week that she intends to vote for the immigration bill as a stand-alone legislation.

"There's a lot of bright young minds out there that we've invested a lot of resources in, and being able to continue that education is an important thing," she said.

"President Obama has pledged to help Democrats pass the bill, and Education Secretary Arne Duncan also pressed the case on Thursday, saying that potential beneficiaries are an "untapped pool of talent." He acknowledged that changes to the legislation were under discussion, and said Congress should seize the opportunity to pass the bill.

"We need to break through on this one," he said."
http://sinelson.typepad.com/susan-i-...rat/dream-act/

This is totally under the radar. I know I know, I hate the source of this article; but i have double checked all the fact in this article. I even looked up in the congressional library for the bills mentioned in this article, and it's true that late Wednesday night Durbin has introduced two new Dream Act bills with narrower focus.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
victor85
View Public Profile
Send a private message to victor85
Find all posts by victor85
#2
11-22-2010, 04:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2010
634 posts
Qualia
20 AP
Link us to the 2 versions of DA.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Qualia
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Qualia
Find all posts by Qualia
#3
11-22-2010, 04:58 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
2 new bills are up. But the text isn't available yet.
Last edited by Feenmi; 11-22-2010 at 05:00 AM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#4
11-22-2010, 04:59 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
167 posts
bonescones
40 AP
Durbin's been pretty quiet lately and I've been wondering w hy. But it looks like he's been working hard quietly to make sure this shit finally passes. He's adding amendments that would attract more republican votes.

I think he's got the right strategy, and I believe in him wholeheartedly.

although it will be very unlucky and sad for those who miss the age cut off.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bonescones
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bonescones
Find all posts by bonescones
#5
11-22-2010, 05:03 AM
Senior Member
From Oklahoma
Joined in Jul 2007
678 posts
IDim's Avatar
IDim
0 AP
No in-state tuition is going to hit me hard.
__________________

Their green grass is green. Our green grass is brown.

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IDim
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IDim
Find all posts by IDim
#6
11-22-2010, 05:04 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
783 posts
victor85
280 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feenmi View Post
2 new bills are up. But the text isn't available yet.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...:FLD001:S57975
Look in the page S7974 and S7976 for the respective bills

Here you go. The text is not available on the bill website yet; but if you look into congressional record, which they record the speech of the senator word by word, you'll find the bill there.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
victor85
View Public Profile
Send a private message to victor85
Find all posts by victor85
#7
11-22-2010, 05:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
783 posts
victor85
280 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDim View Post
No in-state tuition is going to hit me hard.
No in-state tuition for future illegal immigrant.

Once dream act passes, you'll become conditional green card holder, thus qualify for in-state tuition immediately
Last edited by victor85; 11-22-2010 at 05:13 AM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
victor85
View Public Profile
Send a private message to victor85
Find all posts by victor85
#8
11-22-2010, 05:12 AM
Senior Member
From Oklahoma
Joined in Jul 2007
678 posts
IDim's Avatar
IDim
0 AP
Alright good, that's great.

I was wondering if this section means that you don't actually need an Associate's Degree, you just need to be in college for 2 years:
Quote:
(i) The alien has acquired a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States or has completed at least 2 years, in good standing, in a program for a bachelor's degree or higher degree in the United States.
__________________

Their green grass is green. Our green grass is brown.

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IDim
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IDim
Find all posts by IDim
#9
11-22-2010, 05:15 AM
Senior Member
From College Station
Joined in Jul 2008
1,115 posts
Erik1421's Avatar
Erik1421
0 AP
To those of you who won't qualify for under these new amendments, I promise you, I will work as hard as I can to help you attain status. Seriously, if I get a Green card, I will lobby in Washington for a broader Immigration reform and make your voices heard. I believe all dreamers have the same attitude as mine.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Erik1421
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Erik1421
Find all posts by Erik1421
#10
11-22-2010, 05:17 AM
Senior Member
From College Station
Joined in Jul 2008
1,115 posts
Erik1421's Avatar
Erik1421
0 AP
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:6:./temp/~bdod7a:/home/LegislativeData.php|

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:7:./temp/~bdod7a:/home/LegislativeData.php|


Link to both bills, but you can't read them as they aren't updated, yet.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Erik1421
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Erik1421
Find all posts by Erik1421
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 11
  • 21
  • next ›
  • last »
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.