• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Strategy: No Sponsorship for Higher Age Cap

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
12-09-2010, 03:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
354 posts
1L-Deferred
0 AP
No sponsoring families even after becoming a permanent resident.

Why?

Well that shit's in 15 yrs and by that time we probably won't even need to (CIR). And quite frankly it's the Dreamers that deserve legal status more than anyone else.

We can probably even switch up no sponsorship for increasing the age cap at 35.

How do you like that DA_USER?
Last edited by 1L-Deferred; 12-09-2010 at 03:16 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
1L-Deferred
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 1L-Deferred
Find all posts by 1L-Deferred
#2
12-09-2010, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,983 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Let's face it. Reid is not interested in changing the bill yet again. They just want to pass the house version as is. Anyways you can't sponsor under the status of Dream act, and wait to sponsor a sibling as a green card holder is 20 years (you cannot sponsor parents as a LPR) even if your parents were to leave and wait outside US b/c of a 10 year ban, it would take at least 15 years to get them into the country again.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#3
12-09-2010, 03:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
354 posts
1L-Deferred
0 AP
I know it will never work. Just wanted to give some folks a sense of hope in case this issue is taken up next year in the new Congress.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
1L-Deferred
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 1L-Deferred
Find all posts by 1L-Deferred
#4
12-09-2010, 04:45 PM
Member
Joined in Nov 2010
44 posts
trigueno82
0 AP
"We can probably even switch up no sponsorship for increasing the age cap at 35."

I'll do one better.

We'll call it the "bait n switch."

Dreamers get on the path to residency and when they are successfully on the path to citizenship, their parent(s) MUST return to their country of origin within 5 years.

It's an ol' swith-a-roo. Trading low-skill parents for the rights to retain their US educated/brainianc kids.

Most parents of Dreamers would be willing to go back if it meant their kid had a fair chance
at USC.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
trigueno82
View Public Profile
Send a private message to trigueno82
Find all posts by trigueno82
#5
12-09-2010, 04:52 PM
Senior Member
From Oklahoma
Joined in Jul 2007
678 posts
IDim's Avatar
IDim
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by trigueno82 View Post
"We can probably even switch up no sponsorship for increasing the age cap at 35."

I'll do one better.

We'll call it the "bait n switch."

Dreamers get on the path to residency and when they are successfully on the path to citizenship, their parent(s) MUST return to their country of origin within 5 years.

It's an ol' swith-a-roo. Trading low-skill parents for the rights to retain their US educated/brainianc kids.

Most parents of Dreamers would be willing to go back if it meant their kid had a fair chance
at USC.
And what would happen if the parents have children who aren't old enough to live on their own? Just leave them here? One of my siblings is a USA citizen who isn't old enough to live on her own yet. Think things through before you post.
__________________

Their green grass is green. Our green grass is brown.

You can cut all the flowers but you cannot keep spring from coming.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IDim
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IDim
Find all posts by IDim
#6
12-09-2010, 05:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
350 posts
MrsMom
0 AP
Yeah, plus how would you enforce that ? I think telling the public and Senators that realistically there isn't a way for a DREAMer to Sponsor their parents for the next couple of decades makes more sense.
If you look at the comment sections on articles about DREAM ( or just talk to people) there are huge misconceptions about who/how people can immigrate.

I think some of the main myths to clear up, that would increase public support --
1) Undocumented youth can not go join the military
2) Marrying a U.S. citizen doesn't mean an undocumented person can adjust their status automatically.
3) People can't get their paperwork and immediately go bring their relatives in.
4) There is a no legal way for undocumented young people to get their immigration paperwork taken care of in the U.S.
Last edited by MrsMom; 12-09-2010 at 05:03 PM.. Reason: left out a word
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MrsMom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MrsMom
Find all posts by MrsMom
#7
12-09-2010, 05:07 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,983 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Lets face it, changing the bill will put us a few weeks (that we don't have) behind schedule. If we were to change age cap in the senate version of the house bill, we would have to go through conference committee (2 days - 2 weeks) and two more up or down votes (at least a week to schedule a vote).

The congress ends on jan 2nd (and they really dislike to work around and after holidays).
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#8
12-09-2010, 05:10 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1L-Deferred View Post
No sponsoring families even after becoming a permanent resident.

Why?

Well that shit's in 15 yrs and by that time we probably won't even need to (CIR). And quite frankly it's the Dreamers that deserve legal status more than anyone else.

We can probably even switch up no sponsorship for increasing the age cap at 35.

How do you like that DA_USER?
What would I be worried about this when I am not even qualified for the Dream Act to begin with?

Under the current law, you have sponsor if you are PR, but not conditional but this is 10 years down the road.

35 and/or Retro for folks who have 2 years in college like in past bills and I am happy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#9
12-09-2010, 05:12 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
If I fall in love with a Dreamer 10 years from now, then she can sponsor with me also.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#10
12-09-2010, 08:24 PM
Senior Member
From CA
Joined in Oct 2007
1,278 posts
Ark's Avatar
Ark
0 AP
Oh man, come on, at some point you have to realize you're beating a dead horse with these kinds of arguments.

The age cap isn't moving. Period. Move on.
__________________
As a day well spent brings happy sleep, so a life well used brings happy death.
- Leonardo Da Vinci
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ark
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ark
Find all posts by Ark
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.