• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Amnesty: A bigger, better DREAM

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
01-18-2011, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2007
1,481 posts
h3wlett
0 AP
Amnesty: A bigger, better DREAM


By Nick Wallace | IDS
POSTED AT 06:32 PM ON Jan. 17, 2011

Quote:
December turned out to be a good month for President Obama.

But when you win a lot, you lose some.

Unfortunately, those who lost the most as the 111th Congress came to a close were the motivated, successful children of undocumented immigrants. Had the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act been approved by Congress, by 2010 it would have provided a route to citizenship for an estimated 700,000 young people.

But by only providing a path to citizenship for very successful and very young immigrants, the DREAM Act avoided addressing our morally and economically untenable immigration policy as it applies to the estimated 11.5 million undocumented U.S. residents.

For them, and for all reasonable Americans, a general amnesty offers the only real solution.

Amnesty for all immigrants who have not broken any law other than entering the United States without the proper paperwork will undoubtedly be met with resistance from those who cling to the principle that immigration must always proceed in an orderly fashion.

If we take them at their word, these critics of amnesty genuinely want to safeguard the rule of law. Therefore, they claim immigrants already residing in the United States should move to the “back of the line,” returning to their own countries to reapply to re-immigrate lawfully.

With 11.5 million immigrants, or 4 percent of all U.S. residents, living in the country illegally, the idea that our immigration laws have been in any way realistic or enforceable is simply not credible.

If we want immigration laws to be respectable in the future, first we will have to make our laws compatible with our practices. Our government has for decades given immigrants the signal that, though illegal, they are welcome in the United States.

The Center for American Progress writes that the past 20 years of immigration policy amount to a “de facto invitation to undocumented workers to live and work in our country.”

There can be little doubt about the contributions laboring immigrants have made to the United States. Because immigrants without papers cannot take their employer to court for abuses such as less than minimum wage pay, less than ethical employers have used them as a steady supply of cheap labor.

And collectively, we have all benefited not only from the fruits of undocumented immigrants’ labor, but also from their tax contributions to the social services they themselves cannot claim.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that between one-half and two-thirds of undocumented workers in the United States “pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, file tax returns, or do both.”

Economists and business leaders unequivocally agree that, were it possible, driving undocumented workers from the United States would be extremely detrimental and perhaps even catastrophic.


Removing 5 percent of the workforce, many of whom perform jobs that current legal residents are unwilling to accept, would produce damaging labor shortages.


So en masse deportation, or any plan that intends to banish undocumented immigrants, is not a real solution.

In addition to the inestimable costs of forgoing the services provided by undocumented workers, a forced deportation would be costly if not impossible.

Estimates indicate that mass deportation would require a $300 billion commitment over a period of five years.

The human costs would be equally, if not more, severe.

How should the American citizen children of undocumented immigrants be handled? Neither deporting these American citizens with their parents nor separating them from their families provides an acceptable course of action.

Because we cannot enforce current laws, we are faced with the choice of either changing or ignoring them. Currently, we are stuck doing the latter.

Those who oppose amnesty have no substantive alternative. This subjects immigrants and their families to an arbitrary execution of the law.

Deportations will not — and cannot — be enforced uniformly, so a relatively small number of undocumented immigrants are detained and deported to give the law an aura of success. This must change.

Our society has collectively benefited from the labor of undocumented immigrants, and it is beyond time to recognize them as full participants in the civic and economic life of this nation.

Accordingly, they deserve to live without fear of being tossed out as if they were worthless or, worse, dangerous and scheming criminals. Elected representatives and the American public alike should support amnesty.

It is not every day that we have the opportunity to make choices that are both morally and economically sound.


E-mail: [email protected]

Source
Last edited by h3wlett; 01-18-2011 at 03:31 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
h3wlett
View Public Profile
Send a private message to h3wlett
Find all posts by h3wlett
#2
01-18-2011, 02:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2007
141 posts
Pursuitofhappiness
0 AP
Is amnesty ever going to happen?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pursuitofhappiness
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pursuitofhappiness
Find all posts by Pursuitofhappiness
#3
01-18-2011, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
412 posts
Invictus
20 AP
link to original article please.
__________________
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Invictus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Invictus
Find all posts by Invictus
#4
01-18-2011, 03:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2007
1,481 posts
h3wlett
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
link to original article please.
I added a source link accordingly. My mistake, I usually always try to include the original link.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
h3wlett
View Public Profile
Send a private message to h3wlett
Find all posts by h3wlett
#5
01-18-2011, 03:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
120 posts
gwone371
0 AP
The DA didn't pass, I am 100% sure amnesty will never pass
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gwone371
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gwone371
Find all posts by gwone371
#6
01-21-2011, 03:08 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
154 posts
RC010
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwone371 View Post
The DA didn't pass, I am 100% sure amnesty will never pass
Yeah I'm with you on that. But hey the antis are going to be screaming to deport us all for another decade and at the end we still going to be here.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
RC010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RC010
Find all posts by RC010


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.