• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

GOP version of Dream Act holds promise - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • next ›
  • last »
#31
04-06-2012, 12:54 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cacheton011 View Post
I think a special clause for those over 30 should work for both parties. Let's just hope these a$$holes can compromise and actually listen to what dreamers are willing to settle for....cuz if they're just playing with my emotions...ya tu sabes!
Oh, I know what will happen! hahahahahahaah este guey.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#32
04-06-2012, 01:45 AM
BANNED
Joined in Apr 2012
14 posts
Mr.hungcho
0 AP
this bill will not pass. it is too hard for some dreamers ( college part)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Mr.hungcho
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Mr.hungcho
#33
04-06-2012, 01:59 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
^This. If the Democrats block this, they are full of shit. Rubio's idea clearly does not bar us from aspiring to residency and citizenship but it doesn't make it any easier. The idea merits praise because it SIMPLY respects us and respects those who have immigrated here "legally." Guys, we have to get the voice out that some of us, if not a huge number of us, stand with Rubio's idea and that we are with him if he does not set the age limit to low. I would love for him to set the age range of 16-35.

IT IS VITAL THAT YOU GUYS SIGN MY PETITION AND MAKE THE PETITION "PUBLIC." HELP ME OUT HERE.
16 and 35 were always there and so was Retroactive Provisions. They brought it down to 30 and took out Retro in the Lame Duck.

They should pass the same original bill. Who cares about being a USC. Rubio wants Dreamers to have a longer wait for USC. This is awesome. Rubio could put 20 years to become a USC, it is still good.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#34
04-06-2012, 02:01 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Guys, I just got contacted by a reporter from the Miami Herald.

So, age range 16-35? And the visa would have to be renewable?

Everyone, let me know!
Where do you see this information? What did the reporter say? When will the bill be released?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#35
04-06-2012, 02:02 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dres2011 View Post
Yes 16-35, Visa has to turn into a Permanent Residency
Awesome. What did you get this information?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#36
04-06-2012, 02:03 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacvbo View Post
Dude, 35?? Seriously. We all know that is a HUGE NO NO!!! Remember that was one of the major points that republicans and conservatives in general always bring up. Please. Make it 30. Don't want to sound like an ass but its reality. We cannot take the whole cake from the party just a piece. That is exactly why the DA hasnt passed. Because our so called "leaders" and organizations always fkn ASK FOR TOO MUCH!! Make it 30 please.
35 had always been there until Lame Duck. Why leave out the original Dreamers? Age was never the issue.

If 30 then do you support adding back the Retroactive provisions?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#37
04-06-2012, 02:04 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacvbo View Post
Oh yes, and dreamers with 3 felony convictions can also qualify right......Fuck man!!! Reason why stuff never passes!
No felony's. Must have flawless record.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#38
04-06-2012, 02:06 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalditoDuende View Post
I dont see how you are equating a visa that turns into a permanent residency with a dreamer with 3 felony convictions? As for the age cap I would support either making it 35 or 30 with the retroactive provision. come on dude the main reason republicans dont wanna pass the DREAM act is because of chain migration not the age cap. Dont be unfair to some of the older dreamers.
35 with No Retro or 30 with Retro sounds fair.

Age cap was never the issue with anyone.

Plus there were Dreamers in 2001 who were 23 and now 34.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#39
04-06-2012, 02:07 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacvbo View Post
Like I said. I hate to sound like a dick but more than one senator brought up the age cap the last time there was a vote on the DA. Yes, do some research and find out that one of the reasons why conservatives and republicans oppose the DA. Come on bro, most of the 35 year old dreamers are either out of the country or never obtained a degree and are too old to join the armed forces. I am not against the age cap but lets please stop asking for so much otherwise we will never achieve nothing like the past 10 years.
Most likely a 34 year old Dreamer has a Bachelor's and Master's degree ready to use.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#40
04-06-2012, 02:08 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by have View Post
You kids are unbelievably selfish and cowardly.

The older Dreamers did all the marching and fighting for two decades, and these new kids on the block wanna come and just cut them off.

I am raging hard. I propose we only let the old school Dreamers who marched and fought for DA get it. Age must be 30-35.
30 with Retro and 35 with Retro, sounds fair?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.