• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Dispel Immigration Myths

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
12-11-2012, 11:50 AM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
Quote:
Editor's note: Fariborz Ghadar, a distinguished senior scholar and senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Affairs, is a professor and founding director of the Center for Global Business Studies at Penn State University.
(CNN) -- Despite the election cycle rhetoric surrounding immigration, which would make it seem like the rest of the world is swarming across U.S. borders like ants to a picnic, gobbling up our resources, the reality is quite different.
There are a number of myths that we must dispel in order to forge a sound policy, or else we risk our own potential downfall in the long run.
The first myth is that America continues to be a nation of immigrants. The second is that everyone who is thinking of emigrating wants to come to the U.S. Next is the idea that we beat the competition in attracting the best and brightest immigrants. Lastly is the belief that immigrants end up as a burden on our economy.

All of these false notions shape public perception and reaction to immigration reform. If we are to succeed in the next century, we need to base our decisions on facts.

While America at one point had a huge influx of immigrants, today the picture is quite different. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the number of immigrants is almost four times what it was 100 years ago. But if we look at it as a percentage of the total U.S. population, we see that it is about 13%, which is not an all-time high.
As recently as 20 years ago, America was the premier destination of all aspiring immigrants. Today, this is no longer the case. As a percentage of population, Canada and Australia both have significantly higher rates of foreign-born residents than the U.S., at approximately 20% and 26% respectively. In fact, America's rate of foreign-born population -- about 13% -- is now on par with those of France and Germany.
America also no longer draws the smartest people from around the world. Compared with countries like Canada, New Zealand and Australia, the U.S. has a greater proportion of low-skilled rather than high-skilled immigrants. About 30% of immigrants in the U.S. possess a low level of education, and only 35% possess a high level of education. In Canada, only 22% of immigrants have a low level of education, while more than 46% have a high level of education.
Countries like Canada attract a greater influx of immigrants with higher education levels and specialized skills through immigration policies that specifically favor visa applicants with advanced degrees or work experience. In contrast, U.S. policies place more emphasis on family relationships and less consideration on skills or education levels when granting permanent residence.
Perhaps the most persistent modern immigration myth is that immigrants are a drain on our economy, which is simply not true.
Taxes paid by immigrants and their children -- both legal and illegal -- exceed the costs of the services they use. A 2007 report from the White House Council of Economic Advisers concluded that immigration as a whole increases the U.S. GDP by roughly $37 billion each year. A cost estimate by the Congressional Budget Office in 2007 found that a path to legalization for unauthorized immigrants would increase federal revenues by $48 billion but would incur only $23 billion of increased costs from public services, producing a surplus of $25 billion for government coffers. And according to a Social Security Administration Trustees report, increases in immigration have improved Social Security's finances.
The consensus of the economic analysis is that the taxes paid by immigrants and their descendants exceed the benefits they receive.

Even with undocumented immigrants, the Internal Revenue Service estimates that they paid almost $50 billion in federal taxes between 1996 to 2003, including payroll and Social Security (about $8.5 billion per year), property (directly or as part of rental payments) and sales taxes.
Nonetheless, about 40% of undocumented immigrants (PDF) currently work off the books and consequently pay lower taxes. But if we look at their purchasing power, we find that undocumented immigrants sustain hundreds of thousand of U.S. jobs. One study estimates (PDF) that Latino buying power totaled $951 billion in 2008 and will increase to $1.4 trillion by 2013. Asian buying power totaled $509.1 billion in 2008 and is expected to increase to $752.3 billion by 2013.
Countries such as Canada and Australia realized earlier that immigration policy is intrinsically linked to their economic success.
Where U.S. immigration policy attempts to address economic realities is in the H1-B visa classification for highly skilled workers. However, the caps, quotas and numbers don't really work. Ten weeks after the application filing period opened for H1-B visas for fiscal year 2013, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services had reached the statutory cap.
Many American companies are struggling to fill 3.6 million job openings in the U.S., many of them in science- and technology-related fields. The cap stifles economic growth for 10 months until the next H1-B visa application filing period begins.
"The continued failure to devise and implement a sound and sustainable immigration policy threatens to weaken America's economy, to jeopardize its diplomacy, and to imperil its national security," concludes a Council on Foreign Relations Independent Task Force report co-chaired by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Thomas McLarty.
Just as a teenager grows up and dismisses the simplistic views espoused in the fairy tales of childhood, so too must we as a nation face the reality that we are no longer the world leader in welcoming talent. We still have a good chance in regaining the monopoly of what made our nation so great in the first place: a clustering of the best and the brightest from around the world.
not really news but some interesting facts...a good read.
__________________
"In an era of specialists – you’re either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist… or you’re Roger Federer." Jimmy Connors
EAD Approved on 10/19/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#2
12-12-2012, 01:02 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2010
387 posts
ppl_man
0 AP
tl; dr

These numbers are told over and over and over. If you live in NYC you know the City government wants to push some construction in Kasina Park. They claimed it will create 3000 jobs. Awesome. We got lots of great figures showing how it will boost the economy in the neighhood. Well, screw your numbers because it's park and a quite neighthood so there isn't much we can gain. Also, we only get fans coming when it's in the season. So jobs we create post construction == pretty temporary job at most $8, $9 per hour.

Again, these numbers are not really helping. Let's say the real myth is "okay how does the market adjust itself to take in these additional workforce?"
__________________
VERMONT MEME: You can view all the memes here: http://imgur.com/a/hufx7#0
Or follow this thread: http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=36743
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ppl_man
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ppl_man
Find all posts by ppl_man
#3
12-12-2012, 02:39 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
When the CBO speaks, I listen. Theirs are not empty numbers.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#4
12-13-2012, 02:37 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2010
387 posts
ppl_man
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudless View Post
When the CBO speaks, I listen. Theirs are not empty numbers.
Numbers are useless. I have heard lots of good numbers how X construction/expansion would create jobs/commerce. BS. At the end, they either failed or in debt. So sometimes numbers don't solve myth because the opponents will say "yeah Obama says won't increase taxation on the middle income family. Well, look at that report !"
__________________
VERMONT MEME: You can view all the memes here: http://imgur.com/a/hufx7#0
Or follow this thread: http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=36743
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ppl_man
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ppl_man
Find all posts by ppl_man
#5
12-13-2012, 08:31 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppl_man View Post
Numbers are useless. I have heard lots of good numbers how X construction/expansion would create jobs/commerce. BS. At the end, they either failed or in debt. So sometimes numbers don't solve myth because the opponents will say "yeah Obama says won't increase taxation on the middle income family. Well, look at that report !"
CBO numbers don't tell everything and they are never guaranteed to be perfectly accurate, but they're an honest attempt at analysis. They're not comparable to some haphazard numbers thrown together by politicians.

Without numbers you're just gonna rely on imprecise words like 'few', 'many', 'more', 'most' and such. Even more dangerous is the appeal to the nebulous 'common sense'. If good sense is so common, how come so many people is in trouble?
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.