• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Leahy says Senate must act 'quickly' on immigration, offers Republicans 1 hearing

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
04-03-2013, 12:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.fauxnews.com/politics/201...y-immigration/
Quote:
Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy said Tuesday that he would consider holding just one hearing on comprehensive immigration legislation -- which is still being drafted -- despite calls from some Republican senators for a lengthy review.

Leahy clarified his hearing timetable in a letter to Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, a key member of the so-called "Gang of 8" senators drafting an immigration bill. Rubio had written to Leahy last month cautioning that "excessive haste in the pursuit of a lasting solution" is "dangerous" to the goals of immigration reform. He said a "rush to legislate" would be "fatal to the effort of earning the public's confidence."

Leahy, D-Vt., said he wants an open process, but he reiterated that the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he chairs, already has held a number of immigration reform hearings -- though none of them have considered this particular proposal.

Leahy wrote that once that proposal is introduced, "I will consider scheduling a hearing ... to examine that proposal."

He added: "I will, however, remain mindful of the urgent need for us to actually get to the work of debating and considering amendments without unnecessary delay because this is an issue to which our attention is long overdue."

He said Congress must act "quickly and decisively" or else lose the opportunity to pass a bill. He reiterated that he wants a vote in the Senate by this summer.


The comments appeared to challenge concerns voiced by both Rubio and Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., that the Senate might rush a bill to the floor.

Sessions said Tuesday he was "alarmed" by Leahy's response to Rubio.

"Chairman Leahy’s letters to both Senator Rubio and to Committee Republicans reveal a determination to rush a bill through before the public can get involved in the process," Sessions said.

Rubio, R-Fla., had said Sunday that the latest proposal should "only be a starting point" and other senators need to weigh in.

"Eight senators from seven states have worked on this bill to serve as a starting point for discussion about fixing our broken immigration system," he said. "But arriving at a final product will require it to be properly submitted for the American people's consideration, through the other 92 senators from 43 states that weren't part of this initial drafting process. In order to succeed, this process cannot be rushed or done in secret."

The package is said to include:

A program to bring tens of thousands of low-skilled workers into the country as part of a guest worker system.
A pathway to citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants. The proposal would include a 10-year wait for a green card, and a total 13-year wait to apply for citizenship.
Strengthened border security, likely tied to the pathway to citizenship.
Requiring employers to use E-Verify to check immigration status of workers.
Overhauling the legal immigration system, authorizing more visas for high-skilled workers.

Sessions said the immigration reform process, at the committee level alone, should take months, not weeks.

"It is one thing to make promises. It is quite another to write a bill that actually works," Sessions said in a written statement.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
04-03-2013, 02:47 AM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
F.. Sessions, excuse my French
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#3
04-03-2013, 02:48 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2013
67 posts
horseblack
0 AP
great new
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
horseblack
View Public Profile
Find all posts by horseblack
#4
04-03-2013, 07:32 AM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Leahy is as reliable as a horse!! Respect the man. Leahy must hold his ground and remain steadfast sp he can drive us to the Senate Floor and get action started!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#5
04-03-2013, 07:56 AM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
6,007 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Yeah as if Sessions actually wants a meaningful debate on immigration, if he wants to stall so badly you know he's scared shitless.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#6
04-03-2013, 10:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
1,367 posts
Task_1539's Avatar
Task_1539
0 AP
I keep thinking the reasons for Rubio's and Sessions outcries without there being comment from McCain and Grahm make me think there is something Rubi and Sessions are upset about and hope to amend by stalling.
__________________
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Task_1539
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Task_1539
Find all posts by Task_1539
#7
04-03-2013, 12:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
2,113 posts
VeryNicePerson1's Avatar
VeryNicePerson1
0 AP
Thats right Leahy!!! Like a BAWS!!!!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VeryNicePerson1
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VeryNicePerson1
Find all posts by VeryNicePerson1
#8
04-03-2013, 12:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
2,113 posts
VeryNicePerson1's Avatar
VeryNicePerson1
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Task_1539 View Post
I keep thinking the reasons for Rubio's and Sessions outcries without there being comment from McCain and Grahm make me think there is something Rubi and Sessions are upset about and hope to amend by stalling.
I have a feeling the likes of Rubio and Sessions knows CIR is going to pass whether its tomorrow, a week from now, a month from now etc. I think they're stalling for the sake of stalling...and possibly hoping CIR crumbles from loss of momentum and then they could say stuff like "It seems an agreement couldn't be made in Congress", or "Well, I guess it just wasn't the right time for CIR" etc.

The thing is what would happen if CIR fails is a big mystery. Even if CIR fails (which I strongly doubt), the Obama administration may put up their bill for a vote, or the administration may lay it on thick that CIR was sabotaged (specifically by the likes of Rubio and Sessions), or Obama will just introduce a wide sweeping program like DACA for everyone, which would quite possibly give Democrats a gigantic advantage for the 2014 elections.

Speaking of the 2014 mid-term elections, which would be very interesting if a CIR fails in 2013. I predict a chaotic election, possibly with Democrats gaining a significant profit of seats...maybe even the possibility of Boehner losing the Speaker seat.
Last edited by VeryNicePerson1; 04-03-2013 at 02:51 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VeryNicePerson1
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VeryNicePerson1
Find all posts by VeryNicePerson1
#9
04-03-2013, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Been saying this from DAY 1. CIR has only failed in the past because of PERSONAL grudges a FEW old Congressmen have had on immigrants, especially the non-Europeans. Regardless whether Sessions gets time to debate and offer amendments or not, he will never vote yes on the bill! Think logically! This is a last ditch effort to derail the talks.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.