Expanded Daca /Administrative Procedure Act (APA) - Page 2
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IamAman
So what was the April hearing? Are both decisions over the injunction or is there more to the July hearing?
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pink
Yeah, I know... but if this conservative court rules in favor of Hanen and the case has to make its way to the supreme court, this is where the uncertainty lies. We will just have to cross that bridge if we get to it I guess. By the way the link you posted is from an article written in 2012. It is not related to DACA extension in any way.
|
DACA is an existing program. There are NOT three deferred action programs: There's new guidelines to replace 2012 DACA ("Expanded DACA"), and there's DAPA. Two deferred action programs. All press articles focus on DAPA, the 5th ct response focuses on DAPA, the whole issue is with DAPA, not the removing of the age cap and forwarding of the date of presence required for DACA.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
Of course I know it was about 2012 - you wrote about the administrative procedure act, and the article is about notice and comment on the federal register for DACA in 2012.
DACA is an existing program. There are NOT three deferred action programs: There's new guidelines to replace 2012 DACA ("Expanded DACA"), and there's DAPA. Two deferred action programs. All press articles focus on DAPA, the 5th ct response focuses on DAPA, the whole issue is with DAPA, not the removing of the age cap and forwarding of the date of presence required for DACA. |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
Of course I know it was about 2012 - you wrote about the administrative procedure act, and the article is about notice and comment on the federal register for DACA in 2012.
DACA is an existing program. There are NOT three deferred action programs: There's new guidelines to replace 2012 DACA ("Expanded DACA"), and there's DAPA. Two deferred action programs. All press articles focus on DAPA, the 5th ct response focuses on DAPA, the whole issue is with DAPA, not the removing of the age cap and forwarding of the date of presence required for DACA. |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
Of course I know it was about 2012 - you wrote about the administrative procedure act, and the article is about notice and comment on the federal register for DACA in 2012.
DACA is an existing program. There are NOT three deferred action programs: There's new guidelines to replace 2012 DACA ("Expanded DACA"), and there's DAPA. Two deferred action programs. All press articles focus on DAPA, the 5th ct response focuses on DAPA, the whole issue is with DAPA, not the removing of the age cap and forwarding of the date of presence required for DACA. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA
So chances are DACA Expansion could start and NOT Dapa?
|
One in February for the extended age cap for older dreamers which was HALTED. DAPA was suppose to start in May and it is also HALTED. The fate of both is the same as far as the Injunction is concerned. Now the only thing that I'm hoping is that in the July hearings there might be an argument to allow The Age cap for dreamers to be implemented ASAP, while they just deal with DAPA as a separate issue.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pink
No, The fate of both is in the courts. Dtr09 keeps saying that there is no issue with the daca age cap extension and DAPA is the only thing in question. There were two different extended DACA policy changes that was suppose to take effect.
One in February for the extended age cap for older dreamers which was HALTED. DAPA was suppose to start in May and it is also HALTED. The fate of both is the same as far as the Injunction is concerned. Now the only thing that I'm hoping is that in the July hearings there might be an argument to allow The Age cap for dreamers to be implemented ASAP, while they just deal with DAPA as a separate issue. |
When and if the new DACA 2014 guidelines are allowed to be implemented, they will completely replace DACA 2012. Same program, age cap and date of presence updated.
DAPA is a whole different ball game.
Legally and factually, there are only two deferred action plans, not three as many in the press and most in the public understand it to be.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dtrt09
Last post in this matter:
When and if the new DACA 2014 guidelines are allowed to be implemented, they will completely replace DACA 2012. Same program, age cap and date of presence updated. DAPA is a whole different ball game. Legally and factually, there are only two deferred action plans, not three as many in the press and most in the public understand it to be. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lovemode
I just hope they're gonna separated these two and let the eDACA be implemented. sigh.
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I hope Trump wins second term.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pink
No, The fate of both is in the courts. Dtr09 keeps saying that there is no issue with the daca age cap extension and DAPA is the only thing in question. There were two different extended DACA policy changes that was suppose to take effect.
One in February for the extended age cap for older dreamers which was HALTED. DAPA was suppose to start in May and it is also HALTED. The fate of both is the same as far as the Injunction is concerned. Now the only thing that I'm hoping is that in the July hearings there might be an argument to allow The Age cap for dreamers to be implemented ASAP, while they just deal with DAPA as a separate issue. |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»