• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Decision earlier than June?

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
04-16-2016, 04:05 PM
Member
Joined in Mar 2015
67 posts
collins22
0 AP
A break with custom on opinion release
The Supreme Court, altering its usual agenda, will issue one or more opinions in argued cases on Monday of next week, as well as on the more normal days of Tuesday and Wednesday, according to the Court’s telephonic “hotline” announcing its schedule. Ordinarily, when the Court is hearing argument on Mondays, it releases only orders in new cases, and withholds opinions until later in those weeks.

The new plan immediately stirred speculation that the Court has found some specific urgency in a pending case that requires immediate action. Monday will see a large crowd in the courtroom because the case up for argument that day is the major challenge to President Obama’s 2014 revision of immigration policy, in the case of United States v. Texas.

Here is what is now scheduled for Monday: new orders will be released at 9:30 a.m., one or more opinions in argued cases will be released at 10 a.m., the Court for this day will not conduct any admissions to its bar after the release of the opinions, but instead will go directly into the ninety-minute argument on the immigration controversy. It will release the written transcript of that argument within an hour or so after the hearing has ended.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/04/a-...e/#more-241492
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
collins22
View Public Profile
Send a private message to collins22
Find all posts by collins22
#2
04-16-2016, 04:07 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
WOW. That is nice.

Not televised right?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#3
04-16-2016, 07:57 PM
Senior Member
From Virginia
Joined in Aug 2012
2,329 posts
Malign0n's Avatar
Malign0n
0 AP
This is really big. It could mean the court has found that the state's had no legal standing in the case and the justices struck down the injunction.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Malign0n
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Malign0n
Find all posts by Malign0n
#4
04-16-2016, 10:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
wait Monday this monday the 18th?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#5
04-17-2016, 10:49 AM
Senior Member
From AZ
Joined in Jul 2009
455 posts
SuperGSPorty
60 AP
Here's another article:

http://www.latimes.com/nation/immigr...417-story.html
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
SuperGSPorty
View Public Profile
Send a private message to SuperGSPorty
Find all posts by SuperGSPorty
#6
04-17-2016, 05:04 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malign0n View Post
This is really big. It could mean the court has found that the state's had no legal standing in the case and the justices struck down the injunction.
Right!

Already?

How come the 2012 was not challenged then? What is the difference with this one?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#7
04-17-2016, 06:58 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2010
41 posts
sabre4
0 AP
I really wish SCOTUS hadn't allowed the House of Representatives to participate in the oral argument.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
sabre4
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sabre4
Find all posts by sabre4
#8
04-18-2016, 01:29 AM
Junior Member
From Chicago
Joined in Sep 2008
8 posts
pRhyME's Avatar
pRhyME
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA View Post
Right!

Already?

How come the 2012 was not challenged then? What is the difference with this one?
Which one?
__________________
"The Arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice." -MLK
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
pRhyME
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pRhyME
Visit pRhyME's homepage!
Find all posts by pRhyME
#9
04-18-2016, 03:02 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
1,365 posts
zone2oo0's Avatar
zone2oo0
0 AP
wut......
__________________
USCIS SEAL OF APPROVAL.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
zone2oo0
View Public Profile
Send a private message to zone2oo0
Find all posts by zone2oo0
#10
04-18-2016, 03:34 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
551 posts
pink
0 AP
Oh Lordy, Please let it be some good news. We have suffered enough : )
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
pink
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pink
Find all posts by pink


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.