• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

DHS memo about DACA - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#21
09-05-2017, 01:09 PM
Member
Joined in May 2009
78 posts
cali_guy_31
0 AP
Now thousands of people will apply for renewals, which will create a huge backlog and they are already behind (processing applications from April as we speak). It will take many months for some people to receive their renewals.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cali_guy_31
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cali_guy_31
Find all posts by cali_guy_31
#22
09-05-2017, 01:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2016
378 posts
4n0nym0us
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by SurfyB View Post
Also great fucking luck, with a hurricane 5 coming my way, I will probably get deployed to a ton of shelters and not sleep for like 3 days with this shit on my mind. FML.
Right there with you
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
4n0nym0us
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 4n0nym0us
Find all posts by 4n0nym0us
#23
09-05-2017, 01:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2016
1,206 posts
JavierHTx's Avatar
JavierHTx
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cali_guy_31 View Post
Now thousands of people will apply for renewals, which will create a huge backlog and they are already behind (processing applications from April as we speak). It will take many months for some people to receive their renewals.
Um? My friend applied early July, he already got his card in the mail about 3 weeks ago. I applied about 2 weeks later and I should be getting my card soon, I’m sure Hurricane Harvey delayed it.

Idk what April applications you’re talking about.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JavierHTx
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JavierHTx
Find all posts by JavierHTx
#24
09-05-2017, 01:59 PM
Member
Joined in May 2009
78 posts
cali_guy_31
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JavierHTx View Post
Um? My friend applied early July, he already got his card in the mail about 3 weeks ago. I applied about 2 weeks later and I should be getting my card soon, I’m sure Hurricane Harvey delayed it.

Idk what April applications you’re talking about.
That's the processing times announced by USCIS.

https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplayInit.do

Also there are members here who applied for renewals in March/April and still waiting on their renewal.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cali_guy_31
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cali_guy_31
Find all posts by cali_guy_31
#25
09-05-2017, 02:18 PM
Member
From Florida
Joined in May 2010
96 posts
liz92
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4n0nym0us View Post
Right there with you
Same. Cherry on top of a great week.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
liz92
View Public Profile
Send a private message to liz92
Find all posts by liz92
#26
09-05-2017, 02:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2014
1,056 posts
Nycgal111's Avatar
Nycgal111
0 AP
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/09/05/...-arrivals-daca

Frequently asked questions.

Very informative.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Nycgal111
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Nycgal111
Find all posts by Nycgal111
#27
09-05-2017, 02:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
325 posts
Laterlater
0 AP
Wow, this is simply breath-taking:

Although the original DACA policy was not challenged in the lawsuit, both the district and appellate court decisions relied on factual findings about the implementation of the 2012 DACA memorandum. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court that DACA decisions were not truly discretionary,[4] and that DAPA and expanded DACA would be substantially similar in execution. Both the district court and the Fifth Circuit concluded that implementation of the program did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act because the Department did not implement it through notice-and-comment rulemaking.

They simply accepted the factual assumption of the 5th district courts that since A) DAPA did not go though APA procedures, B) DACA being similar to DAPA, therefore C) DACA as well as DAPA do not comply with APA procedures.

And no:
The Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling by equally divided vote (4-4).[5] The evenly divided ruling resulted in the Fifth Circuit order being affirmed.

It neither affirmed or repudiated. It simply split, causing the lower courts ruling to be upheld.

But none of this matter anymore I suppose.
__________________
Originally Posted by desice
As complicated and short life is, it's a shame the things we all have to deal with as human beings. Life is hard enough as it is.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Laterlater
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Laterlater
Find all posts by Laterlater
#28
09-05-2017, 02:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
409 posts
nationalsfan
0 AP
Quote:
From January through August 2019, 321,920 individuals are set to have their DACA/EADs expire. Of these 321,920 individuals, eight have submitted requests for renewal of DACA to USCIS.
lol, wonder if any of the 8 mentioned here are in this forum?

so I guess this means they will actually get processed after all? Maybe I should have applied after all
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
nationalsfan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nationalsfan
Find all posts by nationalsfan
#29
09-05-2017, 02:48 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,460 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laterlater View Post
Wow, this is simply breath-taking:

Although the original DACA policy was not challenged in the lawsuit, both the district and appellate court decisions relied on factual findings about the implementation of the 2012 DACA memorandum. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court that DACA decisions were not truly discretionary,[4] and that DAPA and expanded DACA would be substantially similar in execution. Both the district court and the Fifth Circuit concluded that implementation of the program did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act because the Department did not implement it through notice-and-comment rulemaking.

They simply accepted the factual assumption of the 5th district courts that since A) DAPA did not go though APA procedures, B) DACA being similar to DAPA, therefore C) DACA as well as DAPA do not comply with APA procedures.

And no:
The Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling by equally divided vote (4-4).[5] The evenly divided ruling resulted in the Fifth Circuit order being affirmed.

It neither affirmed or repudiated. It simply split, causing the lower courts ruling to be upheld.

But none of this matter anymore I suppose.
Yep, they have to use false arguments because they don't have legitimate reasons for ending the program.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.