Poll: Huge Support for DREAM Act-Border Security Compromise, 80 Percent! - Page 3

lol, both parties are jokes.
it's been that way for atleast 40 years.

Except one party is signing. What's the other one doing? Literally attempting to make us slaves with no immigrational rights

The others are right; polls mean nothing.

Tbh with you, both parties are the same is only true on some cases, but let's be real Republicans can't govern, they're just obstructionists.. at least democrats can Govern, but they suck at obstructing/running for office.

Only case I could think of both parties being the same is my States senators, Little Marco and Bill Nelson are both as useless as red lights in GTA.

democrats can govern???
do you not remember how little obama actually got done??
with a majority D congress??
how badly clinton damaged the lives and prospects of the previous generation of us and our parents?
what examples do you have of dems being able to govern well??
jimmy carter was ok, but you'd have to go back to jfk to find a decent dem that wasn't a complete corrupt piece of shit.

I believe Obama would've done a lot more shit if it wasn't that he inherited GWB USA which was on the brink of a depression.

He got the relief package passed in 3-4 months, that's already way more than anything this administration has done. Yeah fuck Clinton for sucking the Cuban's dick so much we had to wait for Obama leaving to get all their free shit away. And here we are fighting just for a fucking work permit, but who gave us that work permit? GOP? Exactly.

lol.
that relief package was literally nothing.
so it's the fault of the previous prez?
but he didn't get anything worthwhile done in his 2nd term either, you do realize that right.
all the increased police state, worsening racial relations, worsening middle east, influx of migrants ruining europe, worse income inequality, etc have happened as a result of guess who.
the dems.
if obama had brought wall street to their knees back in 08, you me, and everyone in the U.S. would be infinitely better off. poverty as whole would've decreased tremendously, but no, he bent over backwards for them.
how any of you can blindly praise him while at the same time demonizing repubs for "wanting to break up families" is hilarious.

Exactly why this poll is even more meaningless.

You are so wrong, it's not even funny.
Like a post that I've seen stated " for a president they said got nothing done in 8years they sure are spending a lot of time trying to undue what he did. " Smh

So just to debunk some of your statements, ill mention these things:
Obama inherited a economy on the brink of recession so that stimulus relief package was everything, he helped SAVE the American auto industry.
As for the other things you stated about Obama worsening the racial tension, worsening the middle east with the influx of migrants, and worsening income and wealth inequality, you are so wrong.
First off Obama did not worsen race relations, having a black man as president brought out the hidden racist because they couldn't stand a black man being president.
Secondly Obama did not worsen the middle east, the Bush administration did that by starting a war in Iraq to destabilize the middle east, causing the influx of migrants all over Europe
And lastly Obama did not worsen income inequality, that's more congress voting not to increase minimum wage and other things they did to ensure wall street people maintain their status on top.

Obama wasn't president back in '08. Bush enacted the bank bailouts. (The bank bailouts were a small part of the overall bailout. The rest were administrative actions that did not require approval by Congress, but because they were very controversial, the bank bailouts got all the attention). Obama was merely a senator at the time. He did vote for the bank bailouts, but he was just one vote out of many. This is something that people get wrong all the time. There was actually a poll released years ago that showed that most Americans think Obama enacted the bank bailouts and not Bush, so I guess you're not the only one to make that mistake.

Most economists would disagree with your assertion that the US would be infinitely better off without the bailouts. The consensus was that it was necessary to avoid a depression. And the money gained from the bailouts was greater than the cost, so the taxpayers actually profited (and continue to profit) from the bailout.

Anyway, I think this thread has gone way off topic, so let's all just go back to talking about the poll.