DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

BREAKING: Trump will support a path to citizenship for DACA recipients and Dreamers. - Page 15

Closed Thread
#141
01-25-2018, 06:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
618 posts
hopeful_in_nyc
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBlueGreen View Post
Hopefully they at least manage to include those 3 year renewable work permits for parents
Def a non-starter for the WH. This idea was killed when Gang of 6 presented it.
__________________
——————————————
expires: 10/19/18
renewal packet received: 1/17/18
renewal acceptance: 1/22/18
renewal approval: 5/21/18
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#142
01-25-2018, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Yeah guys this isn't s bill proposal but outline for negotiation for a propose bill. Come next week we will see some major changes
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#143
01-25-2018, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
0 AP
how can an aged out dreamer that didn’t qualify for daca 2012 qualify for this? they said it on the memo, DACAers and people who wouldve qualified for DACA 2012.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
Nope, wrong #s.

Daca did not have a 50 % participation rate. The rest of this 1.8 are aged out and too young,

3.6 includes tps, hb4, h1b kids, etc. not out of status Dreamers.

Dems need to negotiate coverage for actual Dreamers, all of them.
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#144
01-25-2018, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
298 posts
dude33
0 AP
This is crap , you all will agree to throwing your parents under the bus for yourselves? Diversity lottery I can understand but they can't have family sponsorship.
__________________
Date Application Sent - 8/21/2012/Delivered-8/23
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action- 08/28/2012
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/24/12 Walk in: 9-13-12
Date of EAD approved - 10/29/12 Date received -11/03/12 Applied for S.S 11/06/12 Date S.S received 11/10/12
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#145
01-25-2018, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,180 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer__13 View Post
His base actually didn’t go to crazy when news broke yesterday lol.
Fucking Ben Shapiro was defending him.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#146
01-25-2018, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
From Uranus
Joined in Mar 2009
1,213 posts
unthinkable's Avatar
unthinkable
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
Aged out Dreamers have long histories of employment, homes, families, and education. The most equities and the most impact in the economy and employers.

A good negotiation should include them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
Nope, wrong #s.

Daca did not have a 50 % participation rate. The rest of this 1.8 are aged out and too young,

3.6 includes tps, hb4, h1b kids, etc. not out of status Dreamers.

Dems need to negotiate coverage for actual Dreamers, all of them.

Dems can't negotiate for demshit... They've proven themselves to be practically worthless time after time. Trump has them by the balls. They should take the deal now before it gets MUCH WORSE.
__________________
Give me Dream or give me death

Earned my Natty following Uncle Sam's orders
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#147
01-25-2018, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
3,098 posts
fl_dreamer
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
This is for all who arrived as children, even those with TPS, hb4 beneficiaries, etc.

If they keep an arrived by date- ie, by 2012, thats fine, but an age cap is dumb.
Arrived by date for DACA is 2007. Watchu talkin abt!
__________________
Expires: 10/2021. Renewal for extension post 2021 sent.
Update your signature: Click on username, control panel, user settings,edit signature
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#148
01-25-2018, 06:46 PM
Member
Joined in Sep 2017
65 posts
Dreamer24601's Avatar
Dreamer24601
0 AP
It doesn't make sense for the Democrats to limit family sponsorship in exchange for Dreamer relief. Those future immigrants are more likely to be Democrats than Republicans, so any limit will face opposition from the Democrats. I think they should accept the wall and the Diversity Lottery, but insist that the limits on family sponsorship be applied only to Dreamers.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#149
01-25-2018, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
1,153 posts
catportal's Avatar
catportal
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
Nope, wrong #s.

Daca did not have a 50 % participation rate. The rest of this 1.8 are aged out and too young,

3.6 includes tps, hb4, h1b kids, etc. not out of status Dreamers.

Dems need to negotiate coverage for actual Dreamers, all of them.
Don't worry bro, Dems gonna tank this deal harder than Tiananmen Square.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#150
01-25-2018, 06:47 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,986 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
I thinks Dems are going to have a hard time with this, especially all that wall funding. We'll see how negotiations go...
__________________
Newsom 2028!
Yes on CA Prop 50 during the Nov, 2025 special election! Fuck TX's redistricting and gerrymandering.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.