• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

February

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Previous mistake on a College App - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
#31
02-14-2018, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
196 posts
Sky is the limit
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
At the core, USCIS is capable of a lot more than simply digging deep into everyone's past for a present day benefit. The agency can also open investigations into an A-file that has been considered "closed"! An A-file is "closed" when an individual finally is approved for Naturalization/ US citizenship.

We as dreamers make the claim that we are not responsible for the unauthorized actions that brought us here, but that we are simply trying to establish a peaceful life without fear of removal or issues with the government. What I am trying to highlight is that issue would still be prevalent if a false claim to US citizenship was made. DHS immigration agencies can indeed re-open an A-file to see if the application was made truthfully. I just don't see what is the point of lying on an immigration application, establishing yourself over a period of time and continuing with life while STILL looking over your shoulder as a US citizen who made an initial fraudulent application. I would think we are trying to get away from that, but maybe I am wrong.

Still, I believe strongly that dreamers should have the correct information so they may better relate and understand their current situation. However the situation is handled is now up to the individual OP is referring.
I absolutely agree, there are many more serious issues and crimes than simply making such a claim. Still, there is no realistic chance the current administration and Congress will repeal a punitive law that has been in effect since 1996.

This is why I highlighted the seriousness of the claim. It is not only no waivers, but there is also a permanent bar associated.

My biggest concern..most have had to submit some sort of college information for DACA. Should a reform package that deals specifically with Dreamers and the Administration creating a new "immigrant vetting" department, one should be aware specifically with the issues and what may crop up as a result.

I agree with what you said, and I'm fully aware that us government can always open a case and investigate any claims made on an application. They can revoke citizenship, I even read that this administration was going back to the 1990s and trying to revoke citizenship for people that back in the day didn't do the electronic fingerprints, so something's didn't show up in the system when they were approved for citizenship.

Unfortunately we were not born here, so many of us only wrongdoing is related to that fact, and the things we did to get by. Not recommending anyone use "alternative facts" on there applications, but we can't live our whole lives in fear, thinking what if the worst happens. Everyone should be as informed as possible when tackling their immigration situation, but ultimately don't let fear be the driving force behind all your actions.
__________________
" May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears" -Nelson Mandela
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sky is the limit
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Sky is the limit
Find all posts by Sky is the limit
#32
02-14-2018, 04:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
826 posts
AleiaTheEnchanted's Avatar
AleiaTheEnchanted
0 AP
I found this in the website.

Quote:
Protecting the Privacy of Student Education Records
March 1997
(NCES 97-859) Ordering information

Student education records are official and confidential documents protected by one of the nation's strongest privacy protection laws, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). FERPA, also known as the Buckley Amendment, defines education records as all records that schools or education agencies maintain about students.

FERPA gives parents (as well as students in postsecondary schools) the right to review and confirm the accuracy of education records. This and other United States "privacy" laws ensure that information about citizens collected by schools and government agencies can be released only for specific and legally defined purposes. Since enacting FERPA in 1974, Con-gress has strengthened privacy safeguards of education records through this law, refining and clarifying family rights and agency responsibilities to protect those rights.

FERPA's legal statute citation can be found in the U.S. Code (20 USC 1232g), which incorporates all amendments to FERPA. FERPA regulations are found in the Federal Register (34 CFR Part 99). FERPA's 1994 amendments are found in Public Law (P.L.) 103-382.

FERPA Protects Privacy
FERPA applies to public schools and state or local education agencies that receive Federal education funds, and it protects both paper and computerized records. In addition to the Federal laws that restrict disclosure of information from student records, most states also have privacy protection laws that reinforce FERPA. State laws can supplement FERPA, but compliance with FERPA is necessary if schools are to continue to be eligible to receive Federal education funds.

FERPA requires schools and local education agencies to annually notify parents of their rights under FERPA. The notice must effectively inform parents with disabilities or who have a primary home language other than English. The annual notice pertaining to FERPA rights must explain that parents may inspect and review records and, if they believe the records to be inaccurate, they may seek to amend them. Parents also have the right to consent to disclosures of personally identifiable information in the record, except under authorized circumstances.

FERPA gives both parents, custodial and noncustodial, equal access to student information unless the school has evidence of a court order or state law revoking these rights. When students reach the age of 18, or when they become students at postsecondary education institutions, they become "eligible students" and rights under FERPA transfer to them. However, parents retain access to student records of children who are their dependents for tax purposes.
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/web/97859.asp

Quote:
Legally, federal law prevents schools from sharing student information, including their citizenship status, and ICE states that it does not interface with schools at all. In fact, several existing laws make it extremely unlikely that schools are purposefully collaborating with ICE in any way. FERPA, the most widely-cited student privacy law, protects against the sharing of student information except in a few narrow instances that likely would not apply to undocumented students who have not committed a crime. In addition, schools are required to provide education to all students regardless of immigration status, and are prohibited from insisting on certain forms of residency proof due to a 1980s Supreme Court case.
https://www.theatlantic.com/educatio...t-info/477600/
__________________
"God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble."(Psalm 46:1)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AleiaTheEnchanted
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AleiaTheEnchanted
Find all posts by AleiaTheEnchanted
#33
02-14-2018, 07:34 PM
Senior Member
From Garden Grove
Joined in Mar 2013
104 posts
dannyblur
0 AP
Extremely unlikely that ICE will petition the schools she's applied too and look for this type of information.
__________________
Lurking....
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dannyblur
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dannyblur
Find all posts by dannyblur
#34
02-15-2018, 11:12 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
826 posts
AleiaTheEnchanted's Avatar
AleiaTheEnchanted
0 AP
"The BIA reviewed the major federal cases that discussed whether a false claim of citizenship was made in a range of settings: applying for a passport, obtaining a federal student loan, being inspected at the border, seeking private sector employment and responding to questioning by police after an arrest. The BIA concluded that false claims of citizenship must meet two requirements.The first is a finding of subjective intent to achieve a purpose or obtain a benefit under the Act or any federal or state law. The second requirement is that the purpose or benefit must be defined objectively. In other words, the false claim of citizenship must actually relate to the benefit sought. For example, if the person lied about being a U.S. citizen in order to secure a small business loan, and the applicant’s citizenship is irrelevant, then that would not trigger the ground of inadmissibility."

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm reading this and it made me think. So for first requirement, she didn't know and assumed that she was UC so there was no "subjective intent". The second requirement is there was no "benefit" in it as you don't have to be a UC to get into college. An SSN may be needed but she got that due to the petition by her step-mom. Also, highschools tends to prepare this stuff for you. So, the person's claim to citizenship is irrelevant??
__________________
"God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble."(Psalm 46:1)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AleiaTheEnchanted
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AleiaTheEnchanted
Find all posts by AleiaTheEnchanted
#35
02-15-2018, 01:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,713 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleiaTheEnchanted View Post
"The BIA reviewed the major federal cases that discussed whether a false claim of citizenship was made in a range of settings: applying for a passport, obtaining a federal student loan, being inspected at the border, seeking private sector employment and responding to questioning by police after an arrest. The BIA concluded that false claims of citizenship must meet two requirements.The first is a finding of subjective intent to achieve a purpose or obtain a benefit under the Act or any federal or state law. The second requirement is that the purpose or benefit must be defined objectively. In other words, the false claim of citizenship must actually relate to the benefit sought. For example, if the person lied about being a U.S. citizen in order to secure a small business loan, and the applicant’s citizenship is irrelevant, then that would not trigger the ground of inadmissibility."

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm reading this and it made me think. So for first requirement, she didn't know and assumed that she was UC so there was no "subjective intent". The second requirement is there was no "benefit" in it as you don't have to be a UC to get into college. An SSN may be needed but she got that due to the petition by her step-mom. Also, highschools tends to prepare this stuff for you. So, the person's claim to citizenship is irrelevant??
Lol so after you started this whole thing. I have been spending 2 whole days reading up on this. I believe she is fine. If she is scared she should hire a attorney.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
#36
02-15-2018, 02:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
826 posts
AleiaTheEnchanted's Avatar
AleiaTheEnchanted
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR9 View Post
Lol so after you started this whole thing. I have been spending 2 whole days reading up on this. I believe she is fine. If she is scared she should hire a attorney.
Lmaooo! Well idk if I was right about that though. And just like you I've been reading a lot about this too. It's just that for one thing this might become an obstacle to future Dreamers who might have done the same thing for a pathway to citizenship. Because like I said, that question of "Have you ever claimed to be a US Citizen?" will definitely come up in some written form. Just spreading awareness and also an idea of what headache it'll be.
I too believe that she is fine. She doesn't meet the 2 requirements for a claim to be false, therefore, that question doesn't apply to her.
__________________
"God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble."(Psalm 46:1)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AleiaTheEnchanted
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AleiaTheEnchanted
Find all posts by AleiaTheEnchanted
#37
02-16-2018, 01:38 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,713 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleiaTheEnchanted View Post
Lmaooo! Well idk if I was right about that though. And just like you I've been reading a lot about this too. It's just that for one thing this might become an obstacle to future Dreamers who might have done the same thing for a pathway to citizenship. Because like I said, that question of "Have you ever claimed to be a US Citizen?" will definitely come up in some written form. Just spreading awareness and also an idea of what headache it'll be.
I too believe that she is fine. She doesn't meet the 2 requirements for a claim to be false, therefore, that question doesn't apply to her.
Yes, I think this is a common thing among the undocumented immigrant population esp when it comes to things like mortgage loans, car loans, bank account, and etc...It's crazy how they made this so harsh. The answer has to be a "No." Otherwise you're fucked lol.

Yeah she has good grounds to stand on. I hope it all works out for her.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
#38
02-16-2018, 09:57 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
826 posts
AleiaTheEnchanted's Avatar
AleiaTheEnchanted
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR9 View Post
Yes, I think this is a common thing among the undocumented immigrant population esp when it comes to things like mortgage loans, car loans, bank account, and etc...It's crazy how they made this so harsh. The answer has to be a "No." Otherwise you're fucked lol.

Yeah she has good grounds to stand on. I hope it all works out for her.
I agree lol. FYI, this question is also in N-400. This form is for Naturalization which is when you want to become a US citizen. So yes it'll be a huge obstacle for some Dreamers. I really hope they change it the law or at least the wording haha
__________________
"God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble."(Psalm 46:1)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AleiaTheEnchanted
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AleiaTheEnchanted
Find all posts by AleiaTheEnchanted
#39
02-16-2018, 11:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,713 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleiaTheEnchanted View Post
I agree lol. FYI, this question is also in N-400. This form is for Naturalization which is when you want to become a US citizen. So yes it'll be a huge obstacle for some Dreamers. I really hope they change it the law or at least the wording haha
Yeah I actually looked at N-400 first. I think many of us can live without being citizens. It's unfortunate that this question is also on permanent resident application. It's so out of place too. Most of the questions deal with violent crimes, gangs, and etc... but the deadliest is that innocent question lol.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
#40
02-16-2018, 11:32 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
826 posts
AleiaTheEnchanted's Avatar
AleiaTheEnchanted
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR9 View Post
Yeah I actually looked at N-400 first. I think many of us can live without being citizens. It's unfortunate that this question is also on permanent resident application. It's so out of place too. Most of the questions deal with violent crimes, gangs, and etc... but the deadliest is that innocent question lol.
Lol I know right! Deadliest to the point that can cause you a lifetime ban. It's unfair and unjust. I don't even know they will put a question like that there. I understand if it's in the Naturalization part but the LPR?? Wow.
__________________
"God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble."(Psalm 46:1)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AleiaTheEnchanted
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AleiaTheEnchanted
Find all posts by AleiaTheEnchanted
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.