• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Durbin : says Graham’s border-wall framework falls short - Page 8

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
#71
01-10-2019, 07:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
3,742 posts
MIdreamer's Avatar
MIdreamer
0 AP
Quote:
Recommended by
“We feel confident the Supreme Court will find DACA to have been unconstitutional. At that time, he believes there will be an opportunity for us not only address the issue affecting the Dreamers,but also a range of immigration issues,” Pence told reporters during a briefing at the Capitol.
I hate repeating the same thing, but the Supreme Court isn't ruling on if DACA is unconstitutional. They are ruling on if the President can end DACA without following the proper procedure!

The court killed DAPA because Obama didn't follow the same procedure, so it will be interesting to see what will happen.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MIdreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MIdreamer
Find all posts by MIdreamer
#72
01-10-2019, 07:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2017
1,158 posts
BeansDreamtoo21
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIdreamer View Post
I hate repeating the same thing, but the Supreme Court isn't ruling on if DACA is unconstitutional. They are ruling on if the President can end DACA without following the proper procedure!

The court killed DAPA because Obama didn't follow the same procedure, so it will be interesting to see what will happen.
Imo he is saying that daca is unconstitutional because thats what trump said all along. But i think their argument will be that trump has the power to recind daca.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
BeansDreamtoo21
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BeansDreamtoo21
Find all posts by BeansDreamtoo21
#73
01-10-2019, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
6,007 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeansDreamtoo21 View Post
Imo he is saying that daca is unconstitutional because thats what trump said all along. But i think their argument will be that trump has the power to recind daca.
He probably has the power but instead of posting the proposed rule in the federal register and sitting through the 60 day comment period in accordance with the APA he just decided to unilaterally declare "DACA's done". Stable genius, how long has it been? Definitely more than 1 year while the issue got tied up in court.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#74
01-14-2019, 09:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIdreamer View Post
I hate repeating the same thing, but the Supreme Court isn't ruling on if DACA is unconstitutional. They are ruling on if the President can end DACA without following the proper procedure!

The court killed DAPA because Obama didn't follow the same procedure, so it will be interesting to see what will happen.
And re-institute DAPA by setting precedent if he can end DACA.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#75
01-14-2019, 09:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
524 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demise View Post
He probably has the power but instead of posting the proposed rule in the federal register and sitting through the 60 day comment period in accordance with the APA he just decided to unilaterally declare "DACA's done". Stable genius, how long has it been? Definitely more than 1 year while the issue got tied up in court.
But that begs the question: Did he violate the APA on purpose?

I find it hard to believe that it was by accident given the history with DAPA, the tons of lawyers in the Justice Department, and the fact that USCIS has issued rules in the federal register during his 2 years.

That also begs the question: Did Obama purposely violate the APA with DAPA? Something as simple as proposing a rule through the 60 day comment period can't be missed, unless on purpose....
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.