• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Terminator's statement for veto, if anyone cares to read it:

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
10-13-2007, 10:02 PM
Guest
n/a posts
Jourbalist
AP
http://gov.ca.gov/pdf/press/2007bill...%20Message.pdf

To the Members of the California State Senate:

I am returning Senate Bill 1 without my signature.

At a time when segments of California public higher education, the University of California and the California State University, are raising fees on all students attending college in order to maintain the quality of education provided, it would not be prudent to place additional strain on the General Fund to accord the new benefit of providing state subsidized financial aid to students without lawful immigration status. Under existing law, undocumented students, who meet the required criteria, already qualify for the lower in-state tuition rate while attending California public colleges and universities.

Therefore, I cannot sign this bill.

Sincerely,

Arnold Schwarzenegger
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm not mad at him for vetoing it. The in-state is good enough, right CA?? Let's be grateful for what we already have and focus our sights on the federal Dream Act.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Jourbalist
#2
10-13-2007, 10:06 PM
Senior Member
From neighbor of someone from alipac, CA
Joined in Sep 2007
1,664 posts
greentea
10 AP
I agree with him.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
greentea
View Public Profile
Send a private message to greentea
Find all posts by greentea
#3
10-13-2007, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2006
644 posts
glacier1985
0 AP
they should only provide financial aid to those who stays in CA and pay taxes for several years. It certainly doesn't make sense for people who just crossed the border and boom, they should financial aid and stuff like that, it is not acceptable in any nation.
__________________
did you call today?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
glacier1985
View Public Profile
Send a private message to glacier1985
Find all posts by glacier1985
#4
10-13-2007, 10:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
350 posts
MrsMom
0 AP
That is true glacier, and that is not what this bill would have done anyway. It is not what in-state tuition does either. Which is the main argument against it. And one of the main arguments against DREAM , even though instate isn't even in the legislation. Yet every column, every video clip where "they" have they opportunity = they insert the lie that "any undocumented can just cross the border , or just go to any state they want... while citizen kids can not have that break" In actuality , for instate tuition the student has to show they are a resident of that state , it just isn't bringing into question whether their long term residency has been "legal". okay ?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MrsMom
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MrsMom
Find all posts by MrsMom
#5
10-13-2007, 11:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
613 posts
8-bitPanda
0 AP
Ahnold: Teh Califonia Dream Act has been temehnated!

I couldn't help myself.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
8-bitPanda
View Public Profile
Find all posts by 8-bitPanda
#6
10-14-2007, 02:03 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Oct 2007
1 posts
Theleprechaunslady
0 AP
I have to agree with him, we do not want to look too greedy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Theleprechaunslady
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Theleprechaunslady
Find all posts by Theleprechaunslady
#7
10-14-2007, 04:44 AM
Member
Joined in Jun 2007
96 posts
richard777
0 AP
The idea of the bill is good. We should definetely thank the sponsors and supporters of this bill. The problem is what do they do after college graduation if they don't have the right to work? The federal Dream Act will solve this problem effectively.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
richard777
View Public Profile
Send a private message to richard777
Find all posts by richard777
#8
10-14-2007, 04:47 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
265 posts
Roman's Avatar
Roman
0 AP
^

true!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Roman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Roman
Find all posts by Roman
#9
10-14-2007, 02:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
206 posts
gijoe911
0 AP
i think it's okay since i am already paying in state tuition because of the ab540, though i wouldnt mind getting finanical aid..

what's more important is the federal dream act!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gijoe911
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gijoe911
Find all posts by gijoe911
#10
10-14-2007, 03:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
267 posts
GrumpyDreamer
0 AP
yeah but there was a lot of support for this. The regents of the cal states and university of california's wanted it and so did their respective student associations.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
GrumpyDreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to GrumpyDreamer
Find all posts by GrumpyDreamer
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.