• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Lindsey Graham comes out against DACA in infrastructure bill - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
07-30-2021, 07:10 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
they should put in a 1.5 yr to citizenship provision so we can vote in the midterms.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#22
07-30-2021, 07:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2014
511 posts
Vze77ach
0 AP
Where is Bipartisanship now ? All republicans are anti-immigrant! He can keep on kissing Trump’s ass ! All Politician can NOT be trusted ! They are disgusting and hypocritical! I don’t trust Democrat as well. They never deliver their promise !
Last edited by Vze77ach; 07-30-2021 at 07:25 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Vze77ach
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Vze77ach
Find all posts by Vze77ach
#23
07-31-2021, 03:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
651 posts
cmeow
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by daca12 View Post
Where is the statistics?
See the post below:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmeow View Post


Democrats actually lost support amongst hispanics in 2020. Republicans gained 8 points from Hispanic voters from 2016 to 2020. The Hispanic group was the biggest group in the "minority" category that went republican, beating any other "minority" category by more than 2x. The biggest gain for Democrats is +3% from white voters from 2016 to 2020.

If you pander to a group about solving an issue for that group and then lose 8% of those voters to the other party, then it's not surprising that the issue is on the low priority list, if on a list at all. If anything, it'd be on the list because "white" voters support DACA (based off of demographic voting data and only looking at the DACA issue). It isn't shocking news, I mean, just browse this forum. Imagine if Biden & Democrats spends all their political capita to get DACA people citizenship tomorrow. There will be DACA people that vote republican in the next election. It's the same reason why hispanic voters went more republican in 2020. DACA is not an important enough issue for hispanic voters.

I am not surprised DACA is taking a back seat for various reasons. If by Oct / Nov rolls around and nothing is happening, then chances of something happening gets lower as time passes. Democrats are in serious risk of losing the legislative branch in 2022. The way state legislators are doing redistricting & voting, republicans will have the house for quite some time if they win.
If DACA people are legalized and can vote, immigration will no longer be a high priority issue. More important things like healthcare, economy, specific freedoms, etc will come into play. Since the vast majority of DACA holders fall into the "latino" category and that category is shifting republican by twice as much as any minority group from 2016 to 2020, it is a safe assumption to make. There's also studies out there that as people age, they tend to vote more republican. So a DACA person that might vote democrat when they can legally do so, might not be true 2 or even 3 elections down the road.

The republican and democratic party also changes over time. What's true now is not what's true in the future. One party can become better or worse. DACA people would become a normal group of voters based off their needs and the republican party could now, or in the future, promise to fulfill those needs (If you recall, the republican party used to be pro-immigration). There should be no assumption that if DACA are legalized and allowed to vote, they will vote democrat, especially in the long term.
Last edited by cmeow; 07-31-2021 at 03:28 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cmeow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cmeow
Find all posts by cmeow
#24
07-31-2021, 05:27 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
279 posts
skysla
20 AP
Bipartisanship is dead in the Republican Party in this current environment. Lindsey Graham's comment means nothing.

If anything related to DACA or immigration is to be done, it has to be done by Democrats alone. Otherwise, any meaningful change cannot be made. Republicans are negotiation terrorists in immigration and almost any other topic right now. Look at them when it comes to mask wearing or the January 6 insurrection. They will deny anything that does not fit their narratives or interests even if something is a fact. So, in this environment, there is NO WAY that Republicans will try to do anything positive related to DACA or immigration broadly.

Now, the question is how much can be done through reconciliation. Some question legalization cannot be done through reconciliation. Hopefully, Democrats can be smart and do something smart.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
skysla
View Public Profile
Send a private message to skysla
Find all posts by skysla
#25
07-31-2021, 07:21 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysla View Post
Bipartisanship is dead in the Republican Party in this current environment. Lindsey Graham's comment means nothing.
in the "current environment"? bipartisanship died in the Obama years. Which is doubly surprising Biden ran on "bipartisanship", unless it was just a grift and he never meant it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#26
07-31-2021, 01:03 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2016
212 posts
Manhattan2017's Avatar
Manhattan2017
0 AP
Lindsay Graham (or ANY other member of GOP) trying to downvote DACA/immigration reform...?

Attached Images
File Type: jpg 63f.jpg (52.5 KB, 6 views)
__________________
It's hard to not think about it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Manhattan2017
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Manhattan2017
Find all posts by Manhattan2017
#27
07-31-2021, 01:10 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
279 posts
skysla
20 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer12345 View Post
in the "current environment"? bipartisanship died in the Obama years. Which is doubly surprising Biden ran on "bipartisanship", unless it was just a grift and he never meant it.
Yes. Believe it or not. The Obama years were a bit better. Back then, the Democrats were less savvy and had less urgency. Immigration, particularly DREAM Act, was not a big priority. So, it got pushed behind other priorities such as health care, which actually pushed the Democrats out of power in the House first. In 2013, the Senate passed an immigration reform bill with 68 votes. Can you imagine that? Even if the Senate had 60 Democrats today, I don't think we could reach 8 with the current Republican Party.

So, yes. Bipartisanship was doubtful even in the Obama years, but it was not like this. There is really no hope now.

As for the "bipartisanship" Biden campaigned for, it is good politics. It is good politics in terms of appeasing independent voters. Is it effective in terms of policy enacting? Maybe not... It frustrates the left of the Democratic Party.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
skysla
View Public Profile
Send a private message to skysla
Find all posts by skysla
#28
07-31-2021, 01:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysla View Post
Yes. Believe it or not. The Obama years were a bit better. Back then, the Democrats were less savvy and had less urgency. Immigration, particularly DREAM Act, was not a big priority. So, it got pushed behind other priorities such as health care, which actually pushed the Democrats out of power in the House first. In 2013, the Senate passed an immigration reform bill with 68 votes. Can you imagine that? Even if the Senate had 60 Democrats today, I don't think we could reach 8 with the current Republican Party.

So, yes. Bipartisanship was doubtful even in the Obama years, but it was not like this. There is really no hope now.

As for the "bipartisanship" Biden campaigned for, it is good politics. It is good politics in terms of appeasing independent voters. Is it effective in terms of policy enacting? Maybe not... It frustrates the left of the Democratic Party.
All I'm saying is Bipartisanship died long ago (Obama years via Mitch).

Playing bipartisanship is asinine as a political strategy. If you're "independent" right now, you shouldn't reproduce as you're too dumb. It's best to not waste time playing patty cake and risk losing the mid terms, just ram shit through and let results bring the "independents" over. Achieving fuck all not only loses you the independents but your constituents on "the left" who only voted for you to throw democracy a life line.

Fine, you wanted to appease the pussies not paying attention the last 4 yrs in 2020, you got their vote, time to flip flop, he's entertained "bipartisanship" long enough.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#29
07-31-2021, 02:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
279 posts
skysla
20 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer12345 View Post
All I'm saying is Bipartisanship died long ago (Obama years via Mitch).

Playing bipartisanship is asinine as a political strategy. If you're "independent" right now, you shouldn't reproduce as you're too dumb. It's best to not waste time playing patty cake and risk losing the mid terms, just ram shit through and let results bring the "independents" over. Achieving fuck all not only loses you the independents but your constituents on "the left" who only voted for you to throw democracy a life line.

Fine, you wanted to appease the pussies not paying attention the last 4 yrs in 2020, you got their vote, time to flip flop, he's entertained "bipartisanship" long enough.
As you said, I wish Biden and the Democrats played hardball and did as much as they could.
To be fair, they did improve over the years (compared to the past). Biden may say "bipartisanship", but he and the Democrats have gone alone many times just the past 6 months alone.

Also, the world does not work like that. So many people don't watch news and don't care about politics. So, a lot of people are "independent" although they may lean toward one or the other party. And, the current Democratic Party does not work like that, either. It has far broader demographics than the Republican Party. Why do you think Biden, not the other candidates, won the Democratic Party's nomination? The other candidates were not that great... But... He had name recognition but also appealed to more moderate and older people.

Anyway, if they really attempt to include DREAM Act in reconciliation and succeed, we all be happy... although I am not sure the parliamentarian will be okay with the legalization aspect..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
skysla
View Public Profile
Send a private message to skysla
Find all posts by skysla
#30
07-31-2021, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysla View Post
As you said, I wish Biden and the Democrats played hardball and did as much as they could.
To be fair, they did improve over the years (compared to the past). Biden may say "bipartisanship", but he and the Democrats have gone alone many times just the past 6 months alone.

Also, the world does not work like that. So many people don't watch news and don't care about politics. So, a lot of people are "independent" although they may lean toward one or the other party. And, the current Democratic Party does not work like that, either. It has far broader demographics than the Republican Party. Why do you think Biden, not the other candidates, won the Democratic Party's nomination? The other candidates were not that great... But... He had name recognition but also appealed to more moderate and older people.

Anyway, if they really attempt to include DREAM Act in reconciliation and succeed, we all be happy... although I am not sure the parliamentarian will be okay with the legalization aspect..
Biden got the Obama nod and had other candidates converge on him hoping and/or bribed for cabinet positions while Warren stayed in the race to snub Sanders. Like it or not, no, the most popular candidate did not win the nomination. It was a masterful play to take the nomination from the most popular nominee however. You can see it unfold after super tuesday:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...mary-forecast/

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/14/83013...-endorse-biden

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...biden-n1147471

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...sanders-report

The parliamentarian has no power and should be ignored/dismissed. If her decision is upheld, it'll be on the executive's wishes, much like they did w/15/hr
Last edited by dreamer12345; 07-31-2021 at 03:40 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.