Senate parliamentarian pushes Democrats for more details on immigration plan

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...migration-plan

===============
The Senate referee who will decide if a $3.5 trillion spending plan can include long-stalled immigration reform is pushing Democrats for more details on their plan, as they weigh whether or not to give it the green light.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat and Judiciary Committee chairman, said Monday that Democratic staffers will present parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough with new information this week, after they initially briefed her Friday on their reasoning for including immigration reform in the spending bill.

"She still has to make the decision. She asked for additional information, which we're presenting this week," Durbin said, adding that it would be related to the "legal theories."

"We feel very strong about that position and we hope it is persuasive, but ultimately it is her decision," Durbin continued.

Senate Democrats want to include a plan that would give 8 million green cards to four groups: Dreamers, temporary protected status (TPS) holders, agricultural and essential workers. If an immigrant is granted legal permanent resident status that paves the way for them to eventually apply for citizenship, if they can meet other qualifications.

Because Democrats are using reconciliation to try to pass the $3.5 trillion spending plan without GOP votes, the bill has to comply with arcane rules that govern what can be included. The most well-known requirement is that the immigration plan has an impact on federal spending and revenues and that its impact isn’t “merely incidental” to its non-budgetary goals.

Durbin said that Democratic staffers felt "good about" their presentation.

"I hope they are right," he said.

The spending bill represents the best shot for Democrats to get immigration reform to Biden's desk after years of setbacks. Durbin has also been leading a bipartisan group to try to come up with a bill that could get 60 votes, the amount needed to defeat a filibuster, but those have yielded little success.

If MacDonough says that it doesn't comply with the budget rules, the immigration plan will either have to be stripped out or Democrats will need to muster 60 votes to keep it in.

Republican staffers also made their pitch to MacDonough on Friday about why the immigration plan shouldn't be included.

"My staff is very much involved in it. ...We're at the table," Sen. Chuck Grassley (Iowa), the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, said on Monday, adding that there were "ongoing discussions."

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has set a self-imposed deadline of Wednesday for Senate committees to be done drafting their parts of the bill.

But Durbin indicated that the Judiciary Committee could miss that deadline because they won't have a final draft of their piece of the spending package until they get a decision by the parliamentarian on the immigration plan.

"The language coming out of our Judiciary Committee is being vetted through the parliamentarian's office, so we are not prepared to do any final draft until we get that work done," he said.

Say no and get fired Liz

Lol please. That would take the Democrats to have some balls

Knowing Chucky he will let this one slip for sure 100%…He is known to do this time and again. Expect an announcement shortly saying, “We look forward to pursuing separate legislation to address our beloved Dreamers..” lmfao GC for Summer 2022 surely!

Nobody is going to fire her if she says no. Let's hope it's a:

i will be praying to Allah this week.

Not worried about parliamentarian so much. She can be overruled. The challenges will be Manchin and Sinema.

Dems suggested many times that her decision will be respected. I really don't see them overruling her in any scenario

I wonder if Kamala has a plan to something about it or is even aware that this is happening

#FireDatAss