Supreme Court rejects Texas and Louisiana challenge to Biden deportation priorities - Page 2
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next ›
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Swim19
Vox wrote an article analyzing the ruling and from reading that found this:
Finally, Kavanaugh’s opinion also says that “a challenge to an Executive Branch policy that involves both the Executive Branch’s arrest or prosecution priorities and the Executive Branch’s provision of legal benefits or legal status could lead to a different standing analysis.” That language reads like it was tailor-made to allow legal challenges to DACA, a program that allows hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants to live and work in the United States, to move forward. https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/sco...rett-kavanaugh |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988
I think he is separating the concepts of arrest and prosecution priorities with legal benefits... This will allow the states to challenge daca because we get "legal benefits" such as an EAD... To me, it sounds like he already made his decision in regard to daca by saying that the executive brank can choose not to deport us but we cannot get any legal benefits (no EAD).
|
Duh.
__________________
Expired: 07/21/2022Renewal submitted: 07/08/2023
Approved: 11/27/2023
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/121st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Swim19
Found this on r/DACA. Some lawyers think this is all a positive development for the DACA lawsuit:
1) http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2023/06/w...on-polici.html 2) https://reason.com/volokh/2023/06/26...ca-litigation/ 3) audio link - immigration hour : |
__________________
Mid-40's dreamer (yeah, time flies), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine. Have family petition that is now officially current but with past skeletons, is risky to move forward with AOS. Life is on hold for now until laws and/or government becomes more friendly. Life kind of sucks at the moment but like Al Bundy and the mighty cockroach, I survive.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IamAman
This is all very positive. I hope Biden shows initiative and as soon as the lawsuit is dropped due to lack of standing that DACA is updated to include both aged out Dreamers and aged in Dreamers. This is the only way we have to find some sort of status.
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Swim19
Found this on r/DACA. Some lawyers think this is all a positive development for the DACA lawsuit:
1) http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2023/06/w...on-polici.html 2) https://reason.com/volokh/2023/06/26...ca-litigation/ 3) audio link - immigration hour : |
__________________
APPLICATION RECEIVED: 9-19-2012I-797C RECEIVED: 9-26-2012
BIOMETRICS LETTER RECEIVED: 9-27-2012 for 10-16-2012
Walk-In Done: 10-2-2012
EAD/DACA Approve: 12-7-2012
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988
It was very informative and he makes valid points... Daca can be saved for now, not sure what will happen when a Republican takes the WH.
Unfortunately, daca started when I was in my early 20s so I won't be able to adjust to some of the means he talked about such as employment. |
and yes i believe DACA is safe for the foreseeable future but we are at the mercy of every administration change.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next ›
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»