Details For GOP DACA Billl - Page 12
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I really think Canada COULD be a great option for many of us skilled people!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rida980
Heard the job market is not good there due to a huge influx of skilled immigrants. Nevertheless a better option if not US. I honestly hope they figure this out in the next month or so since my entry to Canada is only valid for another 2 months.
|
But it certainly is a very good option for DREAMERS that are looking to start their careers
__________________
EAD Expiration: 12/14/14Renewal sent: 7/24/14 UPS 1 day Courier
Renewal delivered: 7/25/14
G-1145 Notification: 7/28/14 (Nebraska)
Biometrics 8/18/14
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by libertarian1776
lol thats the only thing u got after reading the other provisions?
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ur ok with these provisions?
The bill requires Dreamers to repay to the US government any refunds that they receive from tax credits. I have never seen any provision like this in any bill.
The bill protects the smallest possible group of Dreamers—only those who are currently in DACA at the time of enactment may even apply under the higher evidentiary standard. DACA was an act of prosecutorial discretion for a narrow subset of Dreamers who needed work authorization
The bill also requires all recipients to maintain an income 125% of poverty line. Any Dreamers just starting out in the job market or with incomes below that can’t apply. DACA recipients who care for children or elderly parents can’t apply. Disabled DACA recipients can’t apply.
This income requirement continues *forever* no matter what. It demonstrates that the House GOP considers DACA recipients nothing more than the workers, not Americans or people independent of the value of the labor—and only if they maintain a certain level of productivity.
This status would not come with the automatic right to travel outside the country either. Dreamers would have to pay even more fees to apply to DHS. And they couldn’t leave for more than 2 weeks at a time. No long vacations, study abroad, extended family emergencies.
If Dreamers become poor, take too long vacation, or leave school for 90 days for any reason, they would not only be deported—they would be criminals. First offense, up to 6 months in federal prison. A second offense, up to 2 years. THIS is the status the GOP is offering Dreamers
The bill requires Dreamers to repay to the US government any refunds that they receive from tax credits. I have never seen any provision like this in any bill.
The bill protects the smallest possible group of Dreamers—only those who are currently in DACA at the time of enactment may even apply under the higher evidentiary standard. DACA was an act of prosecutorial discretion for a narrow subset of Dreamers who needed work authorization
The bill also requires all recipients to maintain an income 125% of poverty line. Any Dreamers just starting out in the job market or with incomes below that can’t apply. DACA recipients who care for children or elderly parents can’t apply. Disabled DACA recipients can’t apply.
This income requirement continues *forever* no matter what. It demonstrates that the House GOP considers DACA recipients nothing more than the workers, not Americans or people independent of the value of the labor—and only if they maintain a certain level of productivity.
This status would not come with the automatic right to travel outside the country either. Dreamers would have to pay even more fees to apply to DHS. And they couldn’t leave for more than 2 weeks at a time. No long vacations, study abroad, extended family emergencies.
If Dreamers become poor, take too long vacation, or leave school for 90 days for any reason, they would not only be deported—they would be criminals. First offense, up to 6 months in federal prison. A second offense, up to 2 years. THIS is the status the GOP is offering Dreamers
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA
The other provisions help me.
|
__________________
initial DACA: 6/20122nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by libertarian1776
lol thats the only thing u got after reading the other provisions?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by libertarian1776
ur ok with these provisions?
The bill requires Dreamers to repay to the US government any refunds that they receive from tax credits. I have never seen any provision like this in any bill. The bill protects the smallest possible group of Dreamers—only those who are currently in DACA at the time of enactment may even apply under the higher evidentiary standard. DACA was an act of prosecutorial discretion for a narrow subset of Dreamers who needed work authorization The bill also requires all recipients to maintain an income 125% of poverty line. Any Dreamers just starting out in the job market or with incomes below that can’t apply. DACA recipients who care for children or elderly parents can’t apply. Disabled DACA recipients can’t apply. This income requirement continues *forever* no matter what. It demonstrates that the House GOP considers DACA recipients nothing more than the workers, not Americans or people independent of the value of the labor—and only if they maintain a certain level of productivity. This status would not come with the automatic right to travel outside the country either. Dreamers would have to pay even more fees to apply to DHS. And they couldn’t leave for more than 2 weeks at a time. No long vacations, study abroad, extended family emergencies. If Dreamers become poor, take too long vacation, or leave school for 90 days for any reason, they would not only be deported—they would be criminals. First offense, up to 6 months in federal prison. A second offense, up to 2 years. THIS is the status the GOP is offering Dreamers |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
no it doesnt but damn u must be so desperate at this point to take this. lol
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA
Yes, I am OK with it but it also says it helps the DACA of 2012.
|
__________________
initial DACA: 6/20122nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by libertarian1776
no it doesnt but damn u must be so desperate at this point to take this. lol
|
The bill protects the smallest possible group of Dreamers—only those who are currently in DACA at the time of enactment may even apply under the higher evidentiary standard. DACA was an act of prosecutorial discretion for a narrow subset of Dreamers who needed work authorization
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA
It says:
The bill protects the smallest possible group of Dreamers—only those who are currently in DACA at the time of enactment may even apply under the higher evidentiary standard. DACA was an act of prosecutorial discretion for a narrow subset of Dreamers who needed work authorization |
Whoa I didn't know you had DACA. When did you apply?
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I hope Trump wins second term.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
All I want is to travel freely where I like.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by natalia1
congrats to the 20 dreamers who will qualify for this
|
__________________
All I want is to travel freely where I like.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»