JUST IN: Texas AG Ken Paxton asks federal judge to declare DACA illegal and stop feds - Page 12

Likely or not, I'm just saying it's a possibility. Something people should be aware of but not necessarily depend on it happening. No one knows for sure but I think it's good that we're aware of it. A court even declared Obamacare unconstitutional... we're living in uncertain and strange times.

lmaooo

It's possible that Paxton is asking for a 2 year stay of the decision until the Appeals process. So it doesn't seem like he is asking for an immediate shut down. Thoughts?
cristianafarias
Follow Follow @cristianafarias
More Cristian Farias Retweeted Big Cases Bot
Here we go again:

Texas thinks #DACA is illegal and wants its favorite judge to so hold — if he does, hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries could lose protections.

The state proposes a 2-year deferral of a final order to allow for the case to be appealed in an orderly fashion.

When you read the case brief:

Thus, because the Executive unlawfully created DACA through its
2012 memorandum, that 2012 memorandum must be set aside. However, Plaintiff
States are not seeking the immediate termination of existing grants of deferred action
status pursuant to DACA. Plaintiff States would agree to a stay of the Court’s Order
to allow for an orderly winddown of DACA. That could be accomplished in either of
two ways. First, the Court could partially stay its Order to make the setting aside of
the 2012 memorandum immediately effective against only new grants of deferred
action and grants of renewed deferred action.

In other words, the Order would be
stayed in its effect of setting aside the 2012 memorandum as it relates to existing
grants of deferred action. That would allow existing grants of deferred action to expire
over their stated terms and winddown the program over the next two years. Second,
the Court could stay the effect of its Order in its entirety for two years. That would
allow for orderly appellate review of the Court’s Order and make it known that—
subject to appellate review—the unlawful program will terminate in two

Goddammit, and I was hoping to wait a few months before sending in my renewal for my March 2020 exp. I should probably do it within these next few weeks.

UWD already trying to profit from 21savage.

Well, I'll be dammed.

None of the lawyers have weighed in on this yet. So, as soon as I see anything on Twitter, I'll definitely post it.

EDIT: Cristian Farias tweeted about this.

Here we go again:

Texas thinks #DACA is illegal and wants its favorite judge to so hold — if he does, hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries could lose protections.

The state proposes a 2-year deferral of a final order to allow for the case to be appealed in an orderly fashion.

@CristianFarias

Conversation below tweet asking the questions we need to know:

Irtiza Sheikh
@i_Sheikh14
8h8 hours ago
More
Replying to @cristianafarias
What's the significant of the 2 year deferral? A stay of the decision?

Cristian Farias
‏Verified account
@cristianafarias
2h2 hours ago
More
Yes, basically to allow for the case to be appealed. DACA presumably would stay in place throughout.

They want to bump this to 2020 so bad lol

And what about it?