• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

Β«  

April

  Β»
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

BREAKING: Trump will support a path to citizenship for DACA recipients and Dreamers. - Page 14

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
Closed Thread
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 24
  • 34
  • next ›
  • last »
#131
01-25-2018, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Sep 2006
884 posts
thedream
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by MessiD10s View Post
If this passes would my brother who married a US citizen still be allowed to sponsor my parents?
No. Nobody would be able to sponsor their parents.
__________________
Application Sent: 8/15/12 | Delivered: 8/22/12
I-797C received: 8/24/12 | Sent to Nebraska
Bio appointment: 9/21/12 -failed walk-ins before | Bio done: 9/21/12
Transferred: 10/1/12 to missouri |Transferred back to nebraska: 12/19/12
Status: APPROVED (1/24/13) | EAD-1/30/13
Post your reply or quote more messages.
thedream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to thedream
Find all posts by thedream
#132
01-25-2018, 06:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
The immigrant groups complaining will just be ignored. Come Feb. 8th, they will take this over nothing. This is a reasonable deal actually. Dems lost the position and power to be picky about "limits." It's this or a little better version or nothing.
__________________
#Lawgic
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#133
01-25-2018, 06:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
618 posts
hopeful_in_nyc
0 AP
Again it’s a framework- trump himself said he’s ready to negotiate with dems. We’ll see..
__________________
——————————————
expires: 10/19/18
renewal packet received: 1/17/18
renewal acceptance: 1/22/18
renewal approval: 5/21/18
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hopeful_in_nyc
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hopeful_in_nyc
Find all posts by hopeful_in_nyc
#134
01-25-2018, 06:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil View Post
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...re/1042134001/

Sounds to me like they either don't know the correct number or their is an age limit in place.
This is for all who arrived as children, even those with TPS, hb4 beneficiaries, etc.

If they keep an arrived by date- ie, by 2012, thats fine, but an age cap is dumb.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#135
01-25-2018, 06:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
618 posts
hopeful_in_nyc
0 AP
I feel like the no parent sponsorship will be a tug of war.
__________________
——————————————
expires: 10/19/18
renewal packet received: 1/17/18
renewal acceptance: 1/22/18
renewal approval: 5/21/18
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hopeful_in_nyc
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hopeful_in_nyc
Find all posts by hopeful_in_nyc
#136
01-25-2018, 06:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
742 posts
NotADreamerPerSe
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
The immigrant groups complaining will just be ignored. Come Feb. 8th, they will take this over nothing. This is a reasonable deal actually. Dems lost the position and power to be picky about "limits." It's this or a little better version or nothing.
It honestly isn't that bad, but the family sponsorship worries me. Why would LPRs and citizens go for this?
Post your reply or quote more messages.
NotADreamerPerSe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NotADreamerPerSe
Find all posts by NotADreamerPerSe
#137
01-25-2018, 06:41 PM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Sep 2006
884 posts
thedream
0 AP
If this is truly the starting point for negotiations and the white house is willing to give some concessions, then there is a deal to be had that I would be happy with.
__________________
Application Sent: 8/15/12 | Delivered: 8/22/12
I-797C received: 8/24/12 | Sent to Nebraska
Bio appointment: 9/21/12 -failed walk-ins before | Bio done: 9/21/12
Transferred: 10/1/12 to missouri |Transferred back to nebraska: 12/19/12
Status: APPROVED (1/24/13) | EAD-1/30/13
Post your reply or quote more messages.
thedream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to thedream
Find all posts by thedream
#138
01-25-2018, 06:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
243 posts
RedBlueGreen
0 AP
Hopefully they at least manage to include those 3 year renewable work permits for parents
Post your reply or quote more messages.
RedBlueGreen
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RedBlueGreen
Find all posts by RedBlueGreen
#139
01-25-2018, 06:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
618 posts
hopeful_in_nyc
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotADreamerPerSe View Post
It honestly isn't that bad, but the family sponsorship worries me. Why would LPRs and citizens go for this?
Agreed I think this will be a breaking point... it’s basically taking away the rights of a USC. I can see it as not allowing dreamers who qualify to sponsor parents.
__________________
——————————————
expires: 10/19/18
renewal packet received: 1/17/18
renewal acceptance: 1/22/18
renewal approval: 5/21/18
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hopeful_in_nyc
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hopeful_in_nyc
Find all posts by hopeful_in_nyc
#140
01-25-2018, 06:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian1776 View Post
yes but it does not cover aged out Dreamers of 2012.

Trump will support a path to citizenship for DACA recipients and Dreamers who were eligible for DACA but didn’t apply, which is about 1.8 million Dreamers

up to 1.8 million not 3.0 million who wouldve been covered by the Dream Act itself.
Nope, wrong #s.

Daca did not have a 50 % participation rate. The rest of this 1.8 are aged out and too young,

3.6 includes tps, hb4, h1b kids, etc. not out of status Dreamers.

Dems need to negotiate coverage for actual Dreamers, all of them.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 24
  • 34
  • next ›
  • last »
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.