DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Federal appeals court hears arguments on future of DACA - Page 2

#11
07-06-2022, 07:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
182 posts
Undocumented Immigrant
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapiChulo View Post
beingoflight is basically if glass half empty is a person. jesus christ this mfer is so negative despite everything DACA gave him and what he achieved with it the last 10 yrs.
I think Beingoflight is Polska1/DanielPL
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#12
07-06-2022, 07:22 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2015
1,601 posts
beingoflight's Avatar
beingoflight
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
Y’all mofos are the ones who are negative…how long it been since Joey and Demys took office..not even a single word about Dreamers let alone GC..Trumpy at least said he would strike a deal lol..We don’t want DACA we want Dream Act (which UWD and Dems will never let you have..they need suckers like you to keep their business going)..
ive called for Biden not giving us sht for literal years, these people get so upset because its the truth, we DEFINITELY had better chances at a bill with Trump forcing these mfs to act on urgency. but hey orange man bad.
__________________
We Never Asked For This.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#13
07-06-2022, 07:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
Y’all mofos are the ones who are negative…how long it been since Joey and Demys took office..not even a single word about Dreamers let alone GC..Trumpy at least said he would strike a deal lol..We don’t want DACA we want Dream Act (which UWD and Dems will never let you have..they need suckers like you to keep their business going)..
we’ll be okay, bro.
Last edited by PapiChulo; 07-06-2022 at 08:21 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#14
07-06-2022, 08:08 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,459 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
@camiloreports
If the 5th Circuit finds that some parts of DACA are unlawful, it should only strike down those components, the Biden administration told the court today.

A DHS rule expected in the coming months will separate DACA’s deportation protections from the grant of work authorization.
I feel like this was a mistake of them to give them the option of separating deportation protection from work authorization.

Quote:
@ErikaAndiola
UPDATE: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard the oral argument. It was absolutely frustrating to hear Texas lawyers argue that DACA costs money to Texas without real evidence, but we knew this was coming.
Quote:
@ErikaAndiola
What’s next:
1️⃣DACA recipients can continue to renew!
2️⃣Today we only heard arguments, but decision won’t come until months from now.
3️⃣There is a very real possibility that the program can end with this ruling.
4️⃣There’s also possible they keep it and goes to the Supreme Court.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#15
07-06-2022, 09:12 PM
Member
Joined in Aug 2012
87 posts
daca12
0 AP
I'm more interested in if they will allow the renewals to continue while it's considered in SCOTUS. While it's still not looking good, SCOTUS has a precedent ruling for ACA because the states don't have the standing for the case. Texas and other states didn't show the factual standing that DACA hurts them. Also, it'll take more than a year for SCOTUS to make ruling. It'll be devastating to wait for the ruling without DACA.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#16
07-07-2022, 02:06 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
151 posts
tabi
0 AP
I dont understand the argument that texas is losing money supporting daca recepients considering daca recepients have to pay in and pay taxes just like a regular citizen but cant use those programs they pay into. How are they winning this? Seems like something that would be easy to argue.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#17
07-07-2022, 01:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,253 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
Has anyone considered that the court issue can be resolved if all Daca recipients leave the state of Texas? Simply move out of Texas and the legal cases go away.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#18
07-07-2022, 03:12 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2017
1,397 posts
PapiChulo's Avatar
PapiChulo
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hDreamer1988 View Post
Has anyone considered that the court issue can be resolved if all Daca recipients leave the state of Texas? Simply move out of Texas and the legal cases go away.
they all cant just leave like that though, bro. they have ties to that state.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#19
07-07-2022, 03:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,253 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
Quote:
they all cant just leave like that though, bro. they have ties to that state.
I guess it is just a choice, keep daca or "ties" to the state.. No ties if we get deported
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#20
07-07-2022, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,922 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by beingoflight View Post
ive called for Biden not giving us sht for literal years, these people get so upset because its the truth, we DEFINITELY had better chances at a bill with Trump forcing these mfs to act on urgency. but hey orange man bad.
1] Still supporting Trump.
2] Thinking Trump would ever push for something that would benefit us.
3] Thinking Congress would act.

__________________
Newsom 2028!
Yes on CA Prop 50 during the Nov, 2025 special election! Fuck TX's redistricting and gerrymandering.
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.