• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Supreme Court scheduled to hear DACA arguments in November. - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
09-10-2019, 04:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2008
729 posts
legendver2
legendver2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to legendver2
Find all posts by legendver2
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red neck View Post
Actually they are arguing that the way Trump ended DACA was legal or not legal. If he followed the APA.(Which he did not.)

If Trump wanted he could redo the order to end DACA the proper way and actually end it but he wants the courts to do his dirty work
So won't this be a different case altogether from the current Texas one, which is arguing on the legality of the program itself? I don't see why Hanen is leaving it in SCOTUS hands by kicking the bucket down the road if the 2 cases are arguing different things. And isn't the Hanen case kicked only to October? Would he kick it further down for SCOTUS to make their decision on whether the way it was ended was legal? Let's just say Hanen decides to not kick it down and takes up the second case in October, wouldn't that make the SCOTUS decision pointless if Hanen rules that DACA itself is not legal? This is one big clusterfuck in my eyes lmao.
__________________
Exp 9/20/2018
3rd Renewal sent 1/29/2018 Arrived 1/30/2018
Accepted 2/2/2018 Bio Appt. Notice 2/5/2018
Bio scheduled for 2/23/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#22
09-10-2019, 07:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
4,637 posts
DogJuiceMan's Avatar
DogJuiceMan
DogJuiceMan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DogJuiceMan
Find all posts by DogJuiceMan
0 AP
Government is actually a big clusterfuck. The founding fathers went pretty far, but they could not foresee the advanced scoundrel we have today. The better and more advanced you make a government, the more advanced and skillfull the scoundrels will get.

Moscow Mitch is a big example of scoundrels. All they do is block legislation. They should be tarred and feathered by the people for the gross incompetence and mismanagement of the posts they've been elected to. If someone in the future makes a new government, make sure to have a policy where if the population is dissatisfied with congress, then the congress is emptied out of all members and new elections are held.
__________________
Concept of 彁
Slump of slumps. Clusterfuck of clusterfucks.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#23
09-11-2019, 01:46 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2012
814 posts
DamLeon123
DamLeon123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DamLeon123
Find all posts by DamLeon123
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by beingoflight View Post
DACA is NOT constitutional like it or not.

President CANNOT do those kind of things, CONGRESS takes care of that.

Barack Hussein Obama even said so HIMSELF.
The way you say it makes it look like obama said daca was unsconstitutional. Which is absolutely false he. Look into what he said entirely on the Univision interview. You need to educate yourself. And once again for the millionth time if theres still any confusion or misinformation daca was not a dam executive order.
__________________
Hello ya'll
Last edited by DamLeon123; 09-11-2019 at 01:51 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#24
09-11-2019, 03:37 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2015
1,590 posts
beingoflight's Avatar
beingoflight
beingoflight
View Public Profile
Send a private message to beingoflight
Find all posts by beingoflight
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamLeon123 View Post
The way you say it makes it look like obama said daca was unsconstitutional. Which is absolutely false he. Look into what he said entirely on the Univision interview. You need to educate yourself. And once again for the millionth time if theres still any confusion or misinformation daca was not a dam executive order.
Did you just quoted Univision? Please dont do that EVER again, thanks to their bullshit we are still in fkin limbo. Jorge Ramos is the definition of poor journalism.

The president CANNOT do that kind of immigration move. CONGRESS does that with LEGISLATION.

Go look at the press release when DACA was released, it was. a " TEMPORARY fix" until stricken down so congress could do their JOB to pass LEGISLATION in the meantime

Christ almighty the brainwash is getting worse.
__________________
We Never Asked For This.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#25
09-11-2019, 03:47 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2015
1,590 posts
beingoflight's Avatar
beingoflight
beingoflight
View Public Profile
Send a private message to beingoflight
Find all posts by beingoflight
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapiChulo View Post
kinda hypocritical.

then why do you continue to benefit from a program that you believe shouldn’t exist? you should discard your DACA status then.

nobody can say if its constitutional or not, only SCOTUS can do that.
Lmao.

Which is why the supreme court will strike it down.

What an idiotic way of thinking.

DACA will be eliminated and we have to prepare for the worst just in case congress fails AGAIN with a bill, odds dont look good for us if the idiots at univision and United W Dream keep asking for stupid sht.

Thinking that the program should exist won't change the reality of it. That it is unconstitutional.

Activist courts brought the "illegally" rescinded argument just to buy us more time. We got to be realistic. This affects all of us and we got to put our feet on the ground.
__________________
We Never Asked For This.
Last edited by beingoflight; 09-11-2019 at 03:54 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#26
09-11-2019, 09:44 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by beingoflight View Post
Did you just quoted Univision? Please dont do that EVER again, thanks to their bullshit we are still in fkin limbo. Jorge Ramos is the definition of poor journalism.

The president CANNOT do that kind of immigration move. CONGRESS does that with LEGISLATION.

Go look at the press release when DACA was released, it was. a " TEMPORARY fix" until stricken down so congress could do their JOB to pass LEGISLATION in the meantime

Christ almighty the brainwash is getting worse.

Got any actual proof that daca is unconstitutional? Last I checked it wasn’t even an EO but a memo by USCIS so how could it be unconstitutional?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#27
09-11-2019, 10:10 AM
Senior Member
From South Florida
Joined in May 2008
2,283 posts
ECW
ECW
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ECW
Find all posts by ECW
260 AP
I would hate to do this, but if DACA ends with nothing legislatively in place I will be force to cash out $20,000 in cash advance I have on my capital one credit card.
__________________
APPLICATION RECEIVED: 9-19-2012
I-797C RECEIVED: 9-26-2012
BIOMETRICS LETTER RECEIVED: 9-27-2012 for 10-16-2012
Walk-In Done: 10-2-2012
EAD/DACA Approve: 12-7-2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#28
09-11-2019, 10:29 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2016
1,204 posts
JavierHTx's Avatar
JavierHTx
JavierHTx
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JavierHTx
Find all posts by JavierHTx
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ECW View Post
I would hate to do this, but if DACA ends with nothing legislatively in place I will be force to cash out $20,000 in cash advance I have on my capital one credit card.
And do what?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#29
09-11-2019, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2007
1,617 posts
frbc13's Avatar
frbc13
frbc13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to frbc13
Find all posts by frbc13
0 AP
Supreme Court June 2020: "Yes DACA beneficiaries deserve to die and we hope they burn in hell"
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#30
09-11-2019, 01:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2016
1,204 posts
JavierHTx's Avatar
JavierHTx
JavierHTx
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JavierHTx
Find all posts by JavierHTx
0 AP
And I oop
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.