• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Good thread from an immigration lawyer on the WH Proposal - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
#31
01-25-2018, 11:51 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
318 posts
LiveYourLife
LiveYourLife
View Public Profile
Send a private message to LiveYourLife
Find all posts by LiveYourLife
0 AP
If you guys have the option get your DACA renewals in ASAP roller coaster ride is open 24/7 for a very long. Seems to me that this bill was created so democrats can reject and Republicans will say they tried.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#32
01-25-2018, 11:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
For anyone saying the new framework is holding us ransom, the Durbin Graham Dream Act was doing the same because it also involved concessions. So enough with the contradictions. We know a clean dream act cannot pass. We either make concessions or we end up with nothing.

I respect either choice, but this is just life.
__________________
#Lawgic
Last edited by Smooth; 01-25-2018 at 11:58 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#33
01-25-2018, 11:58 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
For anyone saying the new framework is holding us ransom, the Durbin Graham Dream Act was doing the same because it also involved concessions. We know a clean dream act cannot pass. We either make concessions or we end up with nothing.

I respect either choice, but this is just life.
This!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#34
01-25-2018, 11:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,687 posts
JayR9
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
0 AP
reasonable concessions that both sides could live with. that's how negotiation works. Trump needs to meet in the middle of his demands.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#35
01-26-2018, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR9 View Post
reasonable concessions that both sides could live with. that's how negotiation works. Trump needs to meet in the middle of his demands.
We're not even at day one into negotiations, people need to take a breather.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#36
01-26-2018, 12:05 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
The other irony: if Democrats dislike Trump's idea so much, they should have held the fucking line on the shutdown and pushed their own ideas. They lost that right when they lost their balls. Sorry guys . . . it's either nothing or at least the terms of this framework.

Take your pick.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#37
01-26-2018, 12:07 AM
Member
Joined in Dec 2010
75 posts
Jax57
Jax57
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jax57
Find all posts by Jax57
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
The other irony: if Democrats dislike Trump's idea so much, they should have held the fucking line on the shutdown and pushed their own ideas. They lost that right when they lost their balls. Sorry guys . . . it's either nothing or at least the terms of this framework.

Take your pick.
Or how about passed legislation when they controlled both houses. They're fucking pussies, who just want the status quo.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#38
01-26-2018, 12:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax57 View Post
Or how about passed legislation when they controlled both houses. They're fucking pussies, who just want the status quo.
Yeah, Democrats lost all rights to be bitching and criticizing. They had their chance to advance their compromise agenda through the shutdown, but they gave it up.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#39
01-26-2018, 12:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
2,722 posts
Copper's Avatar
Copper
Copper
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Copper
Find all posts by Copper
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
The other irony: if Democrats dislike Trump's idea so much, they should have held the fucking line on the shutdown and pushed their own ideas. They lost that right when they lost their balls. Sorry guys . . . it's either nothing or at least the terms of this framework.

Take your pick.
Exactly! Now all of a sudden Democrats are trying to play "hardball" because they "care" so much for Dreamers. They gave up that right when they caved during the shutdown.

Either they come to an agreement or Democrats will feel the consequences come November.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#40
01-26-2018, 12:12 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,108 posts
dtrt09
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
0 AP
This proposal ensures that Dreamers over the age of 37 who were left out of Daca will be prevented from regularizing their status since they won't be able to be sponsored by their citizen children, and even if they are married to a citizen, if EWI, they will need to leave the country for up to 10 years.

Wtf is the obsession with cutting them out?
Wtf is the obsession, suddenly, with imprisoning visa overstays?
Wtf is the obsession with creating 2nd class residents without the rights of other permanent residents, but the same responsibilities?

This is garbage.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.