• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Pelosi Rules Out Grand Bargain on Immigration: A Wall in Exchange for Legal Status - Page 5

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#41
05-02-2017, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by tf2legend View Post
How so?
Republicans have had decades to show good will and pass any sort of immigration reform and have done nothing but shoot things down. Expanded DACA, DAPA, letting CIR die on the vine...they are the ones who need to show good will first before they can be trusted. Don't believe fake news.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#42
05-02-2017, 07:03 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
195 posts
AztecAztec
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by NK74 View Post
Fifth, it was said that Republicans proposed legalization without citizenship in 2013-2014, but Dems wouldn't take it. That's nonsense. Find the piece of legislation that was introduced along those lines and I ll give you $100. That's because it's an alternative history. It didn't happen.
Great post, I agree with pretty much everything you said.

I think you were referring to me when you mentioned legalization without citizenship. I said the Republicans were proposing legislation, not that they had introduced legislation. Even if they had, hundreds of bills a year are introduced that die in committee and I probably could find one that stated it if I looked hard enough.

Maybe I should have said, "House Leadership" was proposing that. Cantor and Boehner were bringing up Legalization without citizenship as a way to get something done while claiming they had not been supporting amnesty and pissing off the 'crazy caucus'.

Boehner was going to ignore the Hastert rule on immigration like he did on VAWA to get something done on CIR, and the conservatives pressured him on that.

In the end, the 'crazy caucus' got rid of Boehner and Cantor anyway.

Legalization without citizenship was a non-starter because the Gang of Eight bill had passed with a fillibuster-proof majority in the Senate. S.744 gave a path to citizenship for everybody, so going to just legalization when they thought citizenship for everybody was a done deal, would have been a step back.

I am not looking at either party as good or bad, just a politicians. For me, "Politics is the art of the possible", which means, "It's not about what's right or what's best. It's about what you can actually get done".

I think about what can be done on CIR, not which party is doing it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
AztecAztec
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AztecAztec
Find all posts by AztecAztec
#43
05-02-2017, 07:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
I don't get mad about improbable hypotheticals.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#44
05-03-2017, 01:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer12345 View Post
I don't get mad about improbable hypotheticals.
Exactly. People on here are already turning their backs on Democrats because of a hypothetical thing that Republicans might do and forget the horrors the Republicans have actually done and are doing to immigrants right now.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#45
05-03-2017, 08:01 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAman View Post
Exactly. People on here are already turning their backs on Democrats because of a hypothetical thing that Republicans might do and forget the horrors the Republicans have actually done and are doing to immigrants right now.
Well all that makes sense but DACA being alive is not really hypothetical. It's a fact. And not only is it alive, but Trumps hardcore conservative fans are actually starting to support Dreamers/DACA recipients. As far as I'm concerned that is enough to get me on board tbh with you. It's definitely sad there isn't a solution YET for the rest of the undoc population but I sincerely see that coming soon!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.