Altering DREAM to face new Reality - Page 5
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jay Stone
yup, so it doesn't matter how long it's been as long as it's atleast 5 years and you're under 30, and from what I've seen so far we all fit that here in DAP.
|
If it passes before December 2009 (then it'd be 5 years) then I wouldn't qualify????...I'd die.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
APPLICATION RECEIVED: 9-19-2012I-797C RECEIVED: 9-26-2012
BIOMETRICS LETTER RECEIVED: 9-27-2012 for 10-16-2012
Walk-In Done: 10-2-2012
EAD/DACA Approve: 12-7-2012
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by maurolv
No!...Crap!...I've only been here for 4 years!!!!!!!!!
If it passes before December 2009 (then it'd be 5 years) then I wouldn't qualify????...I'd die. |
__________________
It has been said something as small as the flutter of abutterfly's wing can ultimately cause a typhoon halfway
around the world.
- Chaos Theory
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by icewood313
I Know i am gonna sound selfish but maybe limiting who can qualify based on the demand for certain jobs such as there's a extreme shortage of nurses and minority teachers especially in Math department. on top of that Information Technology jobs are in high demand as evident by Microsoft moving some of its
offices to canada where immigration laws are more relaxed. it just an idea i have and i think it would make it a bit more attractive to the republicans |
This has to be one of the WORST ideas I've ever heard, during my entire time on DAP and COSA, combined.
I know it's just a suggestion but jesus..... what's next, only 5'10" or taller may qualify?
EDIT:
I take that back, this tops it all:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ECW
What if they took out a path to citizenship and we could only get a green card, would that be fine with you guys?
|
B..
...............................
As I've mentioned before, the core idea behind the original post is something for us to discuss, but this thread is FUBAR-ed from all them "Can I qualify????" and ridiculous, absurd ideas on how to package Dream to be more attractive to the opponents. Jesus christ some people....
__________________
Bio Date - 02/22/18 (walked in 2/15)
Expiration - September '18
Approved - 04/09/18
Naturalized via MAVNI | April 2018
Last edited by K-Man; 11-07-2008 at 03:06 AM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quaker
What is this "new" reality?
Since when did Dream provide financial aid? So the other side comes up with a lie that they repeat it over and over and over and instead of countering their lies with the truth we should all just give in? To me altering Dream is nothing short of trying to take the easy way out. Trying to appease the other side is not going to work. Why are we even focusing on anyone like Sessions or their ilk? Dream DID NOT fail because it is a bad bill, Dream failed because we failed to educate enough people about what it really is. Lets do our job and stop trying to take the easy way out as there is no such thing when it comes to this. |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by icewood313
I Know i am gonna sound selfish but maybe limiting who can qualify based on the demand for certain jobs such as there's a extreme shortage of nurses and minority teachers especially in Math department. on top of that Information Technology jobs are in high demand as evident by Microsoft moving some of its
offices to canada where immigration laws are more relaxed. it just an idea i have and i think it would make it a bit more attractive to the republicans |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»