• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham Unveil Bill - Page 8

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • next ›
#71
12-09-2016, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
Remember guys a border security bill can not pass while republicans do not have a filibuster proof majority. They need to work with democrats.
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#72
12-09-2016, 02:51 PM
BANNED
Joined in Nov 2016
54 posts
Chyno.02
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva02 View Post
Remember guys a border security bill can not pass while republicans do not have a filibuster proof majority. They need to work with democrats.
When will they have the majority?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Chyno.02
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Chyno.02
#73
12-09-2016, 02:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2009
391 posts
oneday6
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIdreamer View Post
At this point, I'll take anything that let me work and drive.
It's the simple things in life. lol
__________________
FL Applicant Application Sent- 11/2(Lewisville,TX), Delivered-11/5, G-1145 Notice-????, I-797 Notices-11/13(received)(Vermont), Bio Letter-Received 11/23(sent 11/19)=scheduled for 12/14, BIO Taken-12/13, EAD/DACA Approval-5/14(same day), EAD Arrival-5/18, Learners Lic. -5/23, SS Card -5/31 Official Lic.-6/14Job - 7/12PA School - Starts May 2014
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
oneday6
View Public Profile
Send a private message to oneday6
Find all posts by oneday6
#74
12-09-2016, 02:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Democrats will likely filibuster any effort that is not comprehensive which includes a path to citizenship. In addition, Republicans only need a spending bill to increase enforcement at this point, and are not open to what they see as "amnesty"...even deferred action.

I think what looks likely for immigration over the next couple years

1. Is that DACA will likely end by a new conservative DHS secretary. Deferred Action in prior administrations always came with a notice to appear(removal proceedings). Technically, this is where the dangers lie. The concern lies with interpretation of law by an Attorney General Sessions and how it is carried out by the new DHS Secretary.

2. Prosecutions and interpretations by immigration judges and the BIA are likely to become more punitive. Meaning more cases for immigration judges.

3. Work-site enforcement and home visits will increase.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#75
12-09-2016, 03:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
2,683 posts
jaylove16
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
Democrats will likely filibuster any effort that is not comprehensive which includes a path to citizenship. In addition, Republicans only need a spending bill to increase enforcement at this point, and are not open to what they see as "amnesty"...even deferred action.

I think what looks likely for immigration over the next couple years

1. Is that DACA will likely end by a new conservative DHS secretary. Deferred Action in prior administrations always came with a notice to appear(removal proceedings). Technically, this is where the dangers lie. The concern lies with interpretation of law by an Attorney General Sessions and how it is carried out by the new DHS Secretary.

2. Prosecutions and interpretations by immigration judges and the BIA are likely to become more punitive. Meaning more cases for immigration judges.

3. Work-site enforcement and home visits will increase.
I think you are taking a very negative view on what's going to happen in the next few years. How do you factor in Ryan's comments from yesterday? Or even Trumps comment in that times interview? Democrats realize now that they are in no position to filibuster anything that would help us. It's not like before when we dreamers were in the shadows and they could afford to play those games. Now we are out there in the light, the government has our addresses and information. Things are more serious now!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jaylove16
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jaylove16
Find all posts by jaylove16
#76
12-09-2016, 03:06 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Yes, I agree, this bill cannot and will not pass.

It is absolutely idiotic to market this as a way to "protect us" from Trump... Who came up with that reasoning???

Democrats? They lost, why are they trying to politize the situation even further..

I am so disappointed

I hope I am wrong...
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
Last edited by JohannBernoulli1667; 12-09-2016 at 03:10 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#77
12-09-2016, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
From Sacramento, CA
Joined in Sep 2010
972 posts
jrpallares
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaylove16 View Post
I think you are taking a very negative view on what's going to happen in the next few years. How do you factor in Ryan's comments from yesterday? Or even Trumps comment in that times interview? Democrats realize now that they are in no position to filibuster anything that would help us. It's not like before when we dreamers were in the shadows and they could afford to play those games. Now we are out there in the light, the government has our addresses and information. Things are more serious now!
I agree. It's one thing to learn from past efforts, but another to disregard the current situation. We now have concrete evidence that we are a benefit to American society and the economy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jrpallares
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jrpallares
Find all posts by jrpallares
#78
12-09-2016, 03:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,804 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
Democrats will likely filibuster any effort that is not comprehensive which includes a path to citizenship. In addition, Republicans only need a spending bill to increase enforcement at this point, and are not open to what they see as "amnesty"...even deferred action.

I think what looks likely for immigration over the next couple years

1. Is that DACA will likely end by a new conservative DHS secretary. Deferred Action in prior administrations always came with a notice to appear(removal proceedings). Technically, this is where the dangers lie. The concern lies with interpretation of law by an Attorney General Sessions and how it is carried out by the new DHS Secretary.

2. Prosecutions and interpretations by immigration judges and the BIA are likely to become more punitive. Meaning more cases for immigration judges.

3. Work-site enforcement and home visits will increase.
crossing fingers you are fucken WRONG!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#79
12-09-2016, 03:14 PM
Senior Member
From Sacramento, CA
Joined in Sep 2010
972 posts
jrpallares
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohannBernoulli1667 View Post
Yes, I agree, this bill cannot and will not pass.

It is absolutely idiotic to market this as a way to "protect us" from Trump... Who came up with that reasoning???

Democrats? They lost, why are they trying to politize the situation even further..

I am so disappointed

I hope I am wrong...
That is a good point. Poor choice of words... It should not be based on an us vs them mentality. Maybe it is a way to start the conversation?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jrpallares
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jrpallares
Find all posts by jrpallares
#80
12-09-2016, 03:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
4,644 posts
DogJuiceMan's Avatar
DogJuiceMan
0 AP
People in this thread throwing away bridge act, but recently they were like

;( no senor trump no es take mi DACA porfavor

Bridge Act is as close as we'll get to CIR for the time being, and takes us out of limbo land. I dont know about you guys but working and studing is a whole lot safer once its a LAW.

This whole notion of it'll kill CIR is bogus, its meant to be temporary while they get a fix for the rest of the 11 million. Why would anyone throw away solidfying their position in exchange for shooting for the moon is beyond me.

You cant take a next step if your footing is too wobbly to move forward.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
Democrats will likely filibuster any effort that is not comprehensive which includes a path to citizenship. In addition, Republicans only need a spending bill to increase enforcement at this point, and are not open to what they see as "amnesty"...even deferred action.

I think what looks likely for immigration over the next couple years

1. Is that DACA will likely end by a new conservative DHS secretary. Deferred Action in prior administrations always came with a notice to appear(removal proceedings). Technically, this is where the dangers lie. The concern lies with interpretation of law by an Attorney General Sessions and how it is carried out by the new DHS Secretary.

2. Prosecutions and interpretations by immigration judges and the BIA are likely to become more punitive. Meaning more cases for immigration judges.

3. Work-site enforcement and home visits will increase.
Preposterous. Completely and utterly wrong. You could not be more wrong if you tried.
__________________
I like this quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got_Daca View Post
locodaca.
Last edited by DogJuiceMan; 12-09-2016 at 03:25 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DogJuiceMan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DogJuiceMan
Find all posts by DogJuiceMan
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.