• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Kids Sue Obama Over Parents' Deportations

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
06-17-2009, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Mar 2006
386 posts
deftbeta's Avatar
deftbeta
0 AP
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n5093820.shtml

AP) Roughly 150 children are suing President Barack Obama to halt the deportations of their parents until Congress overhauls U.S. immigration laws.

The children are U.S. citizens and say their constitutional rights are being violated because they, too, probably will have to leave the country if their parents are forced out.

The group is gathering Wednesday in Miami to talk about the case. They originally brought their lawsuit against the Bush administration. It was refiled in January in Miami.

The children's attorneys say the parents came to the United States before 1996 immigration changes made it more difficult for them to become legal residents. They had expected to be allowed to stay.
__________________
Everybody's Lost But they're pretending they're not

http://universityleadership.org/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
deftbeta
View Public Profile
Send a private message to deftbeta
Visit deftbeta's homepage!
Find all posts by deftbeta
#2
06-17-2009, 02:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
115 posts
Selfignorance
0 AP
Dang...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Selfignorance
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Selfignorance
Find all posts by Selfignorance
#3
06-17-2009, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2008
153 posts
tiger66
0 AP
1996? or did they mess up and mean 1986.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tiger66
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tiger66
Find all posts by tiger66
#4
06-17-2009, 05:17 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,456 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
I believe they do mean 1996 because was the year a lot of the more severe immigration laws were passed such as the ten year ban for overstaying a visa.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#5
06-17-2009, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2007
177 posts
elmichoacano's Avatar
elmichoacano
0 AP
yeah that was the year (1996) when BILL CLINTON signed the law that had 287(g) included..
__________________
-----------------------------------------HOUSE ----------------SENATE
August/Labor Day Recess ----------------3 Aug - 7 Sep ---------10 Aug - 7 Sep
TARGET ADJOURNMENT ------------------30 Oct ----------------TBD
"This land was Mexican once, was Indian always and is, And will be again" - Gloria Anzaldúa
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
elmichoacano
View Public Profile
Send a private message to elmichoacano
Find all posts by elmichoacano
#6
06-17-2009, 06:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2007
258 posts
nevfo
0 AP
How has the Bush and the Obama administration responded?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
nevfo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to nevfo
Find all posts by nevfo
#7
06-17-2009, 07:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2008
153 posts
tiger66
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by deftbeta View Post
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n5093820.shtml

AP) Roughly 150 children are suing President Barack Obama to halt the deportations of their parents until Congress overhauls U.S. immigration laws.

The children are U.S. citizens and say their constitutional rights are being violated because they, too, probably will have to leave the country if their parents are forced out.

The group is gathering Wednesday in Miami to talk about the case. They originally brought their lawsuit against the Bush administration. It was refiled in January in Miami.

The children's attorneys say the parents came to the United States before 1996 immigration changes made it more difficult for them to become legal residents. They had expected to be allowed to stay.

Pardon my ignorance, but can someone explain the last sentence? They had expected to be allowed to stay? So everyone that came pre-1996 can stay? ( I am sure this is not the fact, just curious about what they mean by that)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tiger66
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tiger66
Find all posts by tiger66
#8
06-17-2009, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
From The City of Angels, which is located in the Golden State of the Union
Joined in May 2007
705 posts
VaeVictis's Avatar
VaeVictis
0 AP
Holy Shite!! I hope this goes somewhere for the better.
__________________
"We have nothing to dream, but DREAM itself."
- reinterpreting FDR's first inaugural address
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VaeVictis
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VaeVictis
Find all posts by VaeVictis
#9
06-17-2009, 11:35 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jun 2009
8 posts
Transient
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiger66 View Post
Pardon my ignorance, but can someone explain the last sentence? They had expected to be allowed to stay? So everyone that came pre-1996 can stay? ( I am sure this is not the fact, just curious about what they mean by that)

Effective dates of 222(g)INA § 222(g) applies to anyone who entered the United States on a nonimmigrant visa and "stayed beyond the period authorized," no matter when the overstay occurred. Thus, someone whose I-94 expired before September 30, 1996, when the law went into effect, is still considered an overstay and thus is subject to the penalties of the law. Also, a ruling by an immigration judge or a USCIS (or a DHS) officer that the individual violated status, even if such a violation occurred prior to September 30, 1996, would result in application of the overstay penalties.
I forgot where I got that from... but it seems like they don't have case?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Transient
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Transient
Find all posts by Transient


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.