DREAM Act Supporters Endorse Romney

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/naked...-in-miami.html

This pisses me off. Why damn it?! Why!

Can someone please tweet the news anchor Diaz-Balart brother on Telemundo and ask him what the hell is up with this? I would do it, but my internet connection is super slow, and it would take me like 30 minutes just to sign up and comment.

This article is pure bullshit (excuse me for my language). I don't know who's running the movement for the Dreamers in Miami, but us in New York do not support Romney. That's a dam lie! Everyone knows that Romney is strongly and strictly AGAINST the (federal) Dream Act and Immigration Reform. Its time for these people to check their facts. That's the craziest title for an article. Why would the Dreamers work so hard to recall Russell Pearce and support Mitt Romney when they both DO NOT SUPPORT THE DREAM ACT AND IMMIGRATION REFORM? In the words of Ed Schultz from MSNBC, "That's pure psycho talk".

Everyone,

Here is the twitter page of Jose Diaz-Balart. Maybe, we can get him to find answers as to why his brothers endorsed Romney.

http://twitter.com/jdbalart

Please bombard his page with tweets.

Wait.....what?!

For a while it seemed like the Trail of dreams were running the Dream Act movement in south florida. they have fallen off the radar. though this group right here has taken over http://twitter.com/SWER_FL/

Actually the Dreamers have nothing to do with recalling Russell Pearce. It was started by AZ (US) citizens living in Pearce's district, and you couldn't even cast a vote against him or sign the petition unless you're a registered voter in that particular district only...not even the whole AZ.... so the illegals completely have no say in the matter. Although the immigrants...dreamers included....highly supported the movement.

Romney is AGAINST DREAM ACT.
This i so stupid

It is such a misleading title. The article states that three cuban politicians from Florida who have supported the DREAM Act, endorse Mitt Romney, but that is it. It does not mean that they support Romney on his stance on immigration, in fact, it even says that the three disagree on Romney's stance on immigration. So why focus on the point that they disagree as if it was a pivotal point of agreement other than to cause confusion.

Yes, but why endorse a presidential candidate who would evidently veto the DREAM Act or CIR if elected president?

The article just shows that these Republicans don't authentically sympathize with what we go through.

As soon as I read Cuban I stopped reading since they're Republicans anyways.