• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

[IMMIGRATION] Immigration: accentuating the positives

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
#1
03-23-2006, 08:40 PM
Administrator
Joined in Mar 2006
1,749 posts
Nick's Avatar
Nick
Nick
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Nick
Find all posts by Nick
90 AP
Title: Immigration: accentuating the positives
Author: David Harsanyi
Publisher: Denver Post
Date Published: March 23, 2006

Full Text:

Quote:
Immigration: accentuating the positives
by David Harsanyi


In the very near future, I'll be opening an e-mail that asks me a rather straightforward question:

"What part of ILLEGAL immigration do you not understand, $*%#@&*?"

To research my answer, I attended the Independence Institute's "Invitation or Invasion: A Discussion on the Conservative Response to Illegal Immigration" at the Colorado Historical Society.

Here, Jon Caldara had invited, among others, respected free-market conservatives Stephen Moore of the The Wall Street Journal and Daniel Griswold of the Cato Institute, both supporters of liberalizing immigration laws.

On the other side of the issue were Congressman Tom Tancredo and the Claremont Institute's John Andrews.
Panelists could agree on two basic ideas concerning immigration.

One: Borders need to be controlled.

Two: Mass immigration and a growing welfare state are not compatible. We need people to come here; we don't need more people sponging off Uncle Sam.

And that was about it.

On a personal level, I gained a new insight into the definition of ILLEGAL. Namely, too many so-called conservatives want all immigration to fall under this category. And as a son of immigrants, I found it disheartening that so many attendees would clap vigorously at the idea of sealing off American society, criminalizing hard work and ignoring our long, great tradition of immigration.

Wasn't it Ronald Reagan who spoke of immigrants who "possessed a determination that with hard work and freedom, they would live a better life and their children even more so"?

Wasn't it Reagan who gave amnesty to 2.8 million undocumented workers?

Alex Cranberg, chairman of Aspect Energy, perhaps gave the most intriguing speech of the day, pointing out that Germans, Italians, Irish, Jews and everyone in between have heard the same condemnation about their place in society.

Too many. Too soon. Too lazy.

Too different.

Tancredo also claimed he was opposed to ILLEGAL immigration and not immigration. Until, that is, a couple of minutes later when he called for a moratorium on all immigration.

Too many. Too soon.

The congressman, who can attract an impressive crowd even during a Monday snowstorm, is a folk hero to many. And whatever his critics may say, Tancredo's populist rhetoric is free of rancor.

The problem, however, is that Tancredo attracts too many nativists and extremists.

Two of the speakers - neither, incidentally, conservative by any definition (Caldara, what were you thinking?) - illustrate this point.

The first, Frosty Wooldridge, who at one point referred to himself as the Tom Paine of the 21st century, is a Colorado activist who, unlike Paine, argues fervently against freedom.

Wooldridge is, bluntly put, a modern- day Chicken Little who buys into the widely discredited idea of a population bomb.

Yet, incredibly enough, the most contemptible talk came from the mouth of a recent immigrant.

Yeh Ling-Ling is executive director of a group called Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America.

Earlier in the day, Ling-Ling challenged a panelist by pointing approvingly to communist China's policy on population control. Which, of course, means infanticide and forced abortions - if anyone is confused.

This is conservative?

Though it was difficult to understand many parts of Ling-Ling's speech, it was more than apparent that she believed Yeh Ling-Ling should be the last person allowed into the U.S. with an accent.

Now, it's not exactly Tancredo's fault that many of the folks arguing his side of the issue are, um, a tad bit wacky.

Shouldn't this type of ideology be anathema to Colorado conservatives?

And shouldn't anti-ILLEGAL immigration advocates be the first ones to distance themselves from people who peddle ideas of intolerance?


For credibility's sake, at least?


David Harsanyi's column appears Monday and Thursday. He can be reached at 303-820-1255 or dharsanyi@denverpost.com.
Submitted by juang. Thanks.

[This message was automatically generated.]
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#2
03-23-2006, 08:47 PM
Administrator
Joined in Mar 2006
1,749 posts
Nick's Avatar
Nick
Nick
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Nick
Find all posts by Nick
90 AP
I love the style of this author. I think he successfully ridicules the absurdity of Tancredo's position, not to mention his supporters.

PS. What was our general concensus here? Tancredo is an a$$? I think it still stands.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#3
03-24-2006, 12:49 AM
Editor
From Twilight Town
Joined in Mar 2006
1,472 posts
Abaddon
Abaddon
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Abaddon
Find all posts by Abaddon
606 AP
Tancredo is a demagogue.
__________________
Fallor, ergo sum. I err, therefore I AM.--St. Augustine

The miracle of your mind isn't that you can see the world as it is--it's that you can see the world as it isn't.--Kathryn Schultz
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#4
03-24-2006, 12:55 AM
Administrator
Joined in Mar 2006
1,749 posts
Nick's Avatar
Nick
Nick
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Nick
Find all posts by Nick
90 AP
I actually had to look it up. Hehe. He deffinitely is. I guess its a more educated statement than "Tancredo is an a$$". I like your version better.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.