• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

Β«  

February

  Β»
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Day One Recap: Bipartisan Progress On Immigration Reform Bill

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
05-09-2013, 06:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/d...n-reform-bill?
Quote:
Border Security Addressed in Amendments Considered Thursday

On Thursday, the Committee considered amendments to the Pre-Title and Title I of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act. Among the amendments accepted included those offered by Republican Senators to strengthen border security, including an amendment by Senator Grassley to require the government to apply its comprehensive border strategy to the entire Southern border, not just high-risk areas. The Committee accepted amendments by Senators Flake and Grassley to increase oversight of DHS enforcement strategies, and amendments by Senators Sessions and Cornyn to protect border communities.

The Committee adopted amendments to improve treatment of children and families in detention, and protect families affected by violence at the border.

The Committee rejected amendments to triple the number of officers on the Southern Border to 60,000, and to spend billions of additional dollars building a “double fence” on top of the billions of dollars already authorized in this bill.

Amendments Adopted Thursday

Leahy1 – To prohibit the border crossing fees at land ports of entry (bipartisan) – Adopted by Voice Vote
Grassley2 – To require that certain reports be submitted to the Committee on the Judiciary – Adopted by Voice Vote
Grassley5 – To require annual audits of the Comprehensive Immigrations Reform Trust Fund – Adopted by Voice Vote
Sessions36 – To expand the functions of the DHS Immigration Ombudsman to include providing assistance to individuals and families who have been the victims of crimes committed by aliens or violence near the United States border – Adopted by Voice Vote
Cornyn6 – To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to include human trafficking as part 1 violent crime for purposes of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program – Adopted by Voice Vote
Flake1 – To include private land representatives on the Department of Homeland Security Border Oversight Task Force – Adopted by Voice Vote
Flake2 – To require the Government Accountability Office to prepare an annual assessment of the status and progress of the Southern Border Security Strategy – Adopted by Voice Vote
Feinstein6 – To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish standards to ensure humane conditions for children in the custody of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (bipartisan) – Adopted by Voice Vote
Feinstein7 – To require that allocations to law enforcement agencies for Operation Stonegarden be allocated through a competitive grant process – Adopted by Voice Vote
Feinstein8 – To require U.S. Customs and Border Protection to acquire and deploy watercraft to provide support for border-related maritime anti-crime activities – Adopted by Voice Vote
Hirono24 – To propose an alternative to section 1114, relating to the immigration ombudsman – Adopted by Voice Vote
Grassley4 – To prohibit the granting of registered provisional immigrant status until the Secretary has maintained effective control of the borders for 6 months and to apply border security strategies to all border sectors – Vote: 6-12, Not Agreed To
Schumer2 – To improve the bill – Vote: 14-4, Agreed To
Lee4 – To require fast-track congressional approval when the Secretary of Homeland Security notifies Congress of the implementation of the border security strategies and certifies that the strategies are substantially operational – Vote: 6-12, Not Agreed To
Grassley1 – To apply border security strategies to all border sectors – Adopted by Voice Vote
Grassley24 – To ensure accountability and oversight for taxpayer dollars awarded as Federal grants – Adopted by Voice Vote
Feinstein9 – To clarify the immigration-related criminal prosecution costs for which States, tribal, and local governments may be reimbursed by the Federal Government – Adopted by Voice Vote
Sessions37 – To strike the section that requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to issue policies governing the use of force by Department of Homeland Security personnel – Vote: 7-11, Not Agreed To
Coons2 – To limit dangerous deportation practices – Withdrawn
Blumenthal10 – To prohibit reimbursement of governments for prosecution or pre-trial detention of an individual if the Attorney General concludes there is reason to believe that the individual’s underlying apprehension arose from unlawful conduct by a law enforcement official – Adopted by Voice Vote
Cruz1 – To replace title I of the bill with specific border security requirements that shall be met before the Secretary of Homeland Security may process applications for registered immigrant status of blue card status and to avoid Department of Homeland Security budget reductions – Vote: 5-13, Not Agreed To
Hirono23 – To protect family values in programs to apprehend aliens at an intentional border of the United States – Vote: 10-8, Agreed To
Sessions38 – To strike the section that specifies the training requirements for border security and immigration officers and border community liaison officers – Withdrawn
Feinstein11 – To modify the extent of the Southwest border region for purposes of border security – Withdrawn
Feinstein1 – To reauthorize and expand the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program – Vote: 10-8, Agreed To
Feinstein10 – To establish a grant program to improve the transportation infrastructure at existing and new international border crossings – Adopted
Leahy4 – To promote effective deterrents against unlawful border crossings and ensure that border fencing is limited to the Southern border – Adopted by Voice Vote
Sessions9 – To require the completion of the 700 miles of reinforced, double-layered fencing described in section 102(b)(1)(A) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 as a trigger – Vote: 6-12, Not Agreed To
Cornyn1 – To ensure border security for the American people by achieving and maintaining operational control and full situational awareness of the Southern border – Vote: 6-12, Not Agreed To
Feinstein2 – To provide additional permanent district court judgeships in southwest border States – Adopted by Voice Vote
Sessions11 – To ensure that “effective control” specifically includes prevention of unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband, and triggers the initiation of processing for registered provisional immigrant status, and to eliminate the use of the terms “effectiveness rate” and “high risk sectors” from the bill – Vote: 6-12, Not Agreed To
Cornyn2 – To authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to hire an additional 5,000 full-time U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and to authorize the Administrator of the General Services Administration to enter into cost-sharing agreements for the construction of facilities at a port of entry – Withdrawn

Markup to Continue on Tuesday, May 14, at 10:00 a.m.


The Committee has concluded consideration of the Pre-Title and Title I. Chairman Patrick Leahy announced today that the Committee will continue its consideration of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act on Tuesday, May 14, at 10:00 a.m.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
05-09-2013, 08:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
298 posts
dude33
0 AP
So they around to 30 or so amendments today .. so does that mean maybe 9 to 10 more meeting to get to the 300?
__________________
Date Application Sent - 8/21/2012/Delivered-8/23
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action- 08/28/2012
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/24/12 Walk in: 9-13-12
Date of EAD approved - 10/29/12 Date received -11/03/12 Applied for S.S 11/06/12 Date S.S received 11/10/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dude33
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dude33
Find all posts by dude33
#3
05-09-2013, 10:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2009
103 posts
j83
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude33 View Post
So they around to 30 or so amendments today .. so does that mean maybe 9 to 10 more meeting to get to the 300?

Yes. Committee voting by end of the month. Full senate deliberations and amendments by June-July. Voting by end of July. Then it either becomes adopted in the House of Representatives or, if the house comes up with its own version, it will be entered into a senate/house conference committee for merging. The single legislation of the committee will then be sent back to the house and the senate for final passage.

Obama signs it into law.

And only then can this forum once and for all celebrate.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
j83
View Public Profile
Send a private message to j83
Find all posts by j83
#4
05-09-2013, 10:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
^This,It increasingly looks like the House group might not have an agreement so it places the onus on the Senate to form a bill which also increases the likelihood of the House adopting whatever may come out of the Senate.If the Senate language has enough security related amendments within the triggers,while Democrats play defense on the legalization provisions this might create the necessary coalition on the Senate floor,just like the same we saw on the Judiciary today.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#5
05-10-2013, 01:04 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Sounds good to me.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#6
05-10-2013, 08:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
789 posts
Moizy's Avatar
Moizy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by j83 View Post
Yes. Committee voting by end of the month. Full senate deliberations and amendments by June-July. Voting by end of July. Then it either becomes adopted in the House of Representatives or, if the house comes up with its own version, it will be entered into a senate/house conference committee for merging. The single legislation of the committee will then be sent back to the house and the senate for final passage.

Obama signs it into law.

And only then can this forum once and for all celebrate.
Just reading that made my day. Thank you so much.
__________________
Application Filed - 8/16 Chicago Lockbox [Nebraska Service Center]
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 8/27
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/24
Date of Approval of Applications - 12/14
Date of EAD - 12/20
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Moizy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Moizy
Find all posts by Moizy
#7
05-10-2013, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
298 posts
dude33
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moizy View Post
Just reading that made my day. Thank you so much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by j83 View Post
Yes. Committee voting by end of the month. Full senate deliberations and amendments by June-July. Voting by end of July. Then it either becomes adopted in the House of Representatives or, if the house comes up with its own version, it will be entered into a senate/house conference committee for merging. The single legislation of the committee will then be sent back to the house and the senate for final passage.

Obama signs it into law.

And only then can this forum once and for all celebrate.
Great .. i think this is really looking good.. they rejected only a few the republicans amendments and a few was withdrawn .. but it does look like a give and take . I think this is going to work out i just feel it
__________________
Date Application Sent - 8/21/2012/Delivered-8/23
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action- 08/28/2012
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/24/12 Walk in: 9-13-12
Date of EAD approved - 10/29/12 Date received -11/03/12 Applied for S.S 11/06/12 Date S.S received 11/10/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dude33
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dude33
Find all posts by dude33


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.