Picture, media forum

I was wondering if only members with 30+ posts should be able to view it??? Since they went on that trip to d.c and put pics up we don't want anybody just coming in to view them. Just my two cents. By the way i don't think it hurts anyone if you make it 30+ post required.

^It would be discrimination against those of us who are poor and can't afford better postcounts.

I agree, lately there's been a more liberal and safer feeling to DAP, but I think we should still excercise some caution to such an open forum. If we had limitations to seeing media/picture by making it like the sponsorship division forum, open only to trusted members, it'd lighten up the atmosphere and strengthen the bond within DAP.

Exactly

But think of the CHILDREN!

what??? i mean if you really cared about this site and had good intentions 30 posts is nothing.

Hehe, I'm kidding. I just like playing Devil's Advocate.

I'm absolutely for the idea. I think we should have a whole forum sub section like that, but I've said that many times before.

Won't someone PLEASE think of the CHILDREN?!!!

LMAO

Eh, am I the only one who thinks exactly the opposite?

The point of posting those pictures is not to make them available for our private viewing. Their purpose is to put a face (better yet, a thousand) on the DREAM Act.

Those who are posting their pictures accept the "dangers" of doing so. After all, these are just pictures, no names, no addresses.

In fact, I've been working on the new version of the site and a (public) gallery of such pictures is one of the must have features that I want to build in. More so, these pictures will be displayed randomly on the front page.

...Thoughts?

yes I agree with you Nick, you should fix the chat.