• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Obama's trump card on immigration

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
07-31-2013, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...n-deportation-
Quote:
President Obama is tantalizingly close to passing comprehensive immigration reform, a legacy achievement. The Senate has provided a bipartisan bill, and the House is working on reform. The key issues are border security and a legal pathway to citizenship for the estimated 11 million who are here illegally.

The political reasons for the House to negotiate a deal are many. A recent Gallup poll showed that 87% of Americans support comprehensive reform that includes a pathway to citizenship. Moreover, growing numbers of Latino voters in key states turned out in historic numbers for Obama in last year's election, which strongly suggests that, in the long run, Republicans need to address this constituency or continue to lose votes.

However, Speaker John A. Boehner, the Republican's point man in the House, doesn't have the luxury of operating in the long term. The conservative bloc of House Republicans is digging in against reform that includes a pathway to citizenship, and with what promises to be a bloody spending fight with Democrats looming, the speaker needs to strengthen his position with his conference.

It's no wonder the speaker has instructed his committee chairmen to send up smaller, incremental bills for consideration, with a final decision on the path forward to come this fall.

Regardless of what Boehner and the committee chairmen come up with, most of the millions of unauthorized immigrants here now will almost surely stay because it is expensive and time-consuming to deport them. The immigration enforcement system is currently funded to deport roughly 400,000 immigrants a year, funding that's unlikely to increase in difficult budgetary times, and it can take years to get many cases in front of immigration judges.

In part for those reasons, the Department of Homeland Security does not treat all deportations equally. In recent years, the agency has expanded its use of prosecutorial discretion in immigration enforcement, focusing on recent border crossings and public safety threats. Today, deportations of immigrants with strong connections to the U.S. are unlikely.

Indeed, prosecutorial discretion is a guiding principle of this administration's immigration enforcement policy. With it, the administration has moved immigration enforcement from an ad hoc system in which individuals are removed indiscriminately to one that prioritizes criminals, recent border crossers and fugitives. In 2012, 96% of all removals were based on these priorities. Opponents of the policy call it amnesty, but with limited resources, it's obvious why an agency charged with protecting the homeland is focusing its deportation efforts on national security and public safety.

For Obama, expanding prosecutorial discretion in deportations has been good policy and politics. It might just be the trump card he needs to bring House Republicans to the negotiating table.

Last summer, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, which established the first program in which a subset of those here illegally could come forward and register with the government. If you were brought here as a child, are currently in school or the military and have no criminal record, you can get protection from deportation and you can petition for work authorization.

This program, aimed at so-called Dreamers, triggered a wave of enthusiasm in the Latino community, and many political analysts believe it helped the president weather 50% disapproval ratings last summer and win a historic 75% of the Latino vote in November. Nearly 520,000 people have received relief under this program since it was announced.

Now the president should turn again to this playbook and expand the program to other sympathetic categories of immigrants, such as those with a longtime presence in the United States or those with U.S.-citizen family members. The legal parameters and operational protocols have been established, and because this program, like the original Deferred Action program, would be funded from immigrants' fees, it would not require a congressional appropriation. An expanded Deferred Action program could be up and running within weeks.

Of course, those committed to defeating reform would trot out the tired criticism that the president doesn't enforce the laws on the books. They conveniently forget that both parties share the blame for the current system, and they ignore the record-low estimates of border crossing attempts and the record-high number of deportations. (A recent Pew Hispanic Center analysis found net migration from Mexico has fallen to zero in recent years.) Nothing the administration does would change their minds.

It is a near-certainty that expansion of prosecutorial discretion will occur if the House defeats all reform efforts or the House and Senate can't reach an agreement. Perhaps the president can force negotiations by reminding critics that, in the absence of real reform, a president — any party's president — still has to govern. For Boehner and the House GOP, the alternative to negotiating would be expanding "amnesty" without any of the security and business enhancements that the Republicans want and the nation desperately needs.

If the president acts boldly, he might be able to wrest a bill from Congress that could establish his legacy and, more important, secure the real immigration policy changes this country needs.
The President certainly has the ability but it would only be a question of will.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
07-31-2013, 08:22 PM
Senior Member
From Virginia
Joined in Aug 2012
2,329 posts
Malign0n's Avatar
Malign0n
0 AP
Its an extreme resort to expand prosecutorial discretion to all 11 million undocumented immigrants. But if like the article proposes, "expand Deferred Action to a specific subset such as long term residents and relatives of US citizens", then I believe it would be more workable for the President to implement without severe backlash.

He should do it, if Congress should fail.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Malign0n
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Malign0n
Find all posts by Malign0n
#3
07-31-2013, 08:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
If the House chooses to do absolutely nothing and kills this bill, a bill that so many people had worked so hard on and had the support of the Senate and the President with no chance of it passing for another 4 years, Obama would have nothing to lose by doing this. Why not. I want me some DACA too.
__________________
Late 40's Dreamer (Holy Fucking shit I'm almost 50 and still dealing with this), aged out of original DACA and didn't have a chance to apply for extended DACA after Republicans killed it on the vine.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#4
07-31-2013, 09:58 PM
Member
Joined in Jun 2013
69 posts
johnnytest08
0 AP
He should do that if congress fails to do anything. Heck, he should just grant amnesty.
__________________
Give Trump his Wall, Give me my Greencard
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
johnnytest08
View Public Profile
Send a private message to johnnytest08
Find all posts by johnnytest08
#5
07-31-2013, 09:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
276 posts
swiftp's Avatar
swiftp
0 AP
Interesting read but could you mark articles like these with an [Opinion] tag? I was getting excited until I realized it was an editorial
__________________
App Sent: 06/12/2013 to Phoenix lockbox, routed to Nebraska.
G-1145 Notification: 6/24/2013
Biometrics Letter Received: 07/07/2013
Biometrics Walk-In: 07/09/2013
Approval!: 08/27/2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swiftp
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swiftp
Find all posts by swiftp
#6
07-31-2013, 10:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by swiftp View Post
Interesting read but could you mark articles like these with an [Opinion] tag? I was getting excited until I realized it was an editorial
Sure,I'll try in the future if I can.

I was thinking perhaps the President might extend it to groups who are immediate relatives of US citizens who maybe undocumented,older Dreamers and possibly those that are currently Stateless might not elicit any sort of backlash.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#7
08-01-2013, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
From Las Vegas
Joined in Dec 2012
283 posts
Atelier's Avatar
Atelier
0 AP
Great idea, maybe he can raise DACA age cap too and incentiveize the asian vote to be democratic by rewarding them somehow.
__________________
Hopeful (Or) Hopeless
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Atelier
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Atelier
Find all posts by Atelier
#8
08-01-2013, 01:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2013
100 posts
El Caminante
0 AP
A very interesting take on what could happen if House remains stoic about CIR. This could be a make or break legislation that could solidify our presidents legacy and secure his place in American history (even more). However, executive action could have many repercussions and its ripple effects drastically alter democratic party in the years to come if GOP decides to sell such move as "amnesty" to their districts with low migrant population.

Daca passage on this article highlights the real potential of this program and how it can develop into something much more substantial than what it currently is. There is much hope here, we are ever so close to witness something larger than life.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
El Caminante
View Public Profile
Send a private message to El Caminante
Find all posts by El Caminante


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.